Discursive strategies of instrumentalizing history in mainstream Turkish political discourse
The case of the negative other presentation of the CHP
Can Küçükali |
Lancaster University | firstname.lastname@example.org
This article explores how specific narratives of the past can be functionalized/instrumentalized as discursive strategies in order to gain political power. To investigate this issue, four relevant governmental and non-governmental texts about the main opposition party in Turkey are analysed. The Republican People’s Party (CHP), which played a historic role by becoming a state party between 1923 and 1946, and which later adopted a social democratic position in the political system, has frequently been criticized by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) for its historical identity. The article illuminates how discursive strategies of argumentation, nomination and predication are used to portray the CHP as an enduring bureaucratic-militarist state party and the ways in which these strategies are functionalized by AKP politicians as well as by public intellectuals in favour of the government.
2001“The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–119.
2010“Transformation of Turkish Islamism and the Rise of the Justice and Development Party.”Turkish Studies 11 (1): 59–84.
2009“The German Left, the Berlin Wall and the Second Great Crash.”Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 17 (1): 41–54.
2011O ayet sinir bozucu. Accessed March 3, 2012. [URL]
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993“Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Studies in Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk.
Special İssue ofDiscourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.
2002 “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Redaktion der Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik. (ZfAL) 361: 5–31.
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2011“Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, ed. by Walter Steinmetz, 351–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, Ruth, and Gertraud A. Borea
(eds) 2009Justice and Memory: Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An İnternational Comparison. Wien: Passagen Verlag.
Wodak, Ruth, and Rudolf De Cillia
2007“Commemorating the Past: The Discursive Construction of Official Narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’.”Discourse & Communication 1 (3): 315–341.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
(eds) 2001Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2003Turkey: A Modern History.London: I.B. Tauris.
Cited by 4 other publications
2016. De-Europeanisation through Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of AKP’s Election Speeches. South European Society and Politics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.