Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Political Discourse
Edited by Pascal Fischer and Christoph Schubert
[Journal of Language and Politics 13:2] 2014
► pp. 255–288

Conversational framing in televised political discourse

A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy

| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam | Moscow State Linguistic University |
| Università di Roma – La Sapienza |

The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that ‘populist’ politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of ‘fictive interaction’ with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as ‘populist’ – Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi – with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic ‘performance’.

Keywords: conversationalisation, debate, fictive interaction, framing, gesture, interview, populist, television
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Conversational framing
  • 3.Hypotheses and their relation to populism
  • 4.Data
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Use of personal pronouns
    • 5.2Use of colloquial vocabulary and pronunciation
    • 5.3Length of intonation units in words
    • 5.4Syntactic structures
    • 5.5Co-verbal behaviour
  • 6.Conclusions and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.04cie
References
Atkinson, Max
1984 Our Master’s Voice: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auter, Philip J., and Donale M. Davis
1991 “When Characters Speak Directly to Viewers: Breaking the Fourth Wall in Television.” Journalism Quarterly 68 (1/2): 165–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W
1999 “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 221: 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Linda Coates, and Lori Roe
1992 “Interactive Gestures.” Discourse Processes 151: 469–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Gestures Specialized for Dialogue.” Personality and Psychology Bulletin 21 (4): 394–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, A
2004 Il Linguaggio e la Retorica della Nuova Politica Italiana: Silvio Berlusconi e Forza Italia. Genova: Erga.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin
2005 “Mental Simulation in Literal and Figurative Language Understanding.” In The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought, ed. by Seana Coulson, and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 255–278. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “A Typology of English Texts.” Linguistics 271: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2006 “Who are we and who are you? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text & Talk 26 (1): 3–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campus, Donatella
2006 L’antipolitica al Governo: De Gaulle, Reagan, Berlusconi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret
1981 Populism. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
1999 “Trust the People! Populism and the two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 471: 2–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cartocci, Roberto
1996 “L’Italia Unita dal Populismo.” Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia 37 (2): 287–295.Google Scholar
Ceaser, James W., Andrew Busch, and John J. Pitney
2009 Epic Journey: The 2008 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan
2007 “Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, Domains.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 170–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Spoken Language Framing in Political Discourse.” Paper Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions , Lisbon, April 2009.
Clark, Herbert
1973 “Space, Time, Semantics, and the Child.” In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, ed. by Timothy E. Moore, 27–63. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croci, Osvaldo
2001 “Language and Politics in Italy: From Moro to Berlusconi.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 6 (3): 348–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1993 “The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies.” Cognitive Linguistics 41: 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Intonation and Grammatical Structure.” Linguistics 331: 839–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
2003 “Discourse and Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 21, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 47–87. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John, Susanna Cumming, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, and Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data, ed. by Jane Anne Edwards, and Martin D. Lampert, 45–87. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1973 “Il linguaggio politico.” In I linguaggi settoriali in Italia, ed. by Gian Luigi Beccaria, 91–105. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace Friesen
1969 “The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behaviour: Categories, Origins, Usage and Coding.” Semiotica 11: 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen
1997 “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse: A Comparative View.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 111: 89–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fedel, Giorgio
2003 “Parla mia: La retorica di Silvio Berlusconi.” Il Mulino 52 (3): 463–473.Google Scholar
Fennema, Meindert
2005 “Populist Parties of the Right.” In Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism in the Western World, ed. by Jens Rydgren, 1–24. Hauppauge, NY: Nova.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000 “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text 20 (4): 415–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1975 “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” Berkeley Linguistics Society 11: 123–131.Google Scholar
1982 “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by the Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Flores d’Arcais, Paolo
1996 Il Populismo Italiano da Craxi a Berlusconi: Dieci Anni di Regime nelle Analisi di MicroMega. Roma: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Germani, Gino
1978 Authoritarianism, Fascism and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Giansante, Gianluca
2010a “Morfologia di una campagna: La strategia elettorale di Berlusconi in TV.” In Le Parole della Politica, ed. by Michele Prospero, and Christian Ruggiero, 67–110. Napoli: ScriptaWeb.Google Scholar
2010b “La costruzione strategica dell’eroe e dell’antagonista nel discorso politico di Berlusconi.” Comunicazione Politica 11 (3): 389–401.Google Scholar
Glenberg, Arthur M., and Michael P. Kaschak
2002 “Grounding Language in Action.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 91: 558–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
1974 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J., and Joseph Courtés
1979 Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la theorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter M
1979 “The Presidency and Impression Management.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 21: 283–305.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1989 Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilley, Joe
2008 Sarah Palin: A New Kind of Leader. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Incisa di Camerana, Ludovico
2004 “Populismo.” In: Dizionario di scienza politica, ed. by Norberto Bobbio, Nicola Matteucci, and Gianfranco Pasquino, 735–739. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1972 “Some Relationships between Body Motion and Speech.” In Studies in Dyadic Communication, ed. by Aron Wolfe Siegman, and Benjamin Pope, 177–210. New York: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behaviour in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, Chris L
1986 “Gaze and Eye Contact: A Research Review.” Psychological Bulletin 1001: 78–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to your Brain and its Politics. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2005 The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loehr, Daniel P
2004 Gesture and Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Mannone, Andrea, and Giuseppe A. Veltri
2010 “A ‘Sick Man’ in Europe.” In Italy Today: The Sick Man of Europe, ed. by Andrea Mannone, and Giuseppe A. Veltri, 1–15. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsden, Lee, and Heather Savigny
2009 Media, Religion and Conflict. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried Schulz
1999 “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication 161: 247–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel
2001 Populismo e Democrazia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
1998 “Iconicity and Gesture.” In Oralité et gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, ed. by Serge Santi, Isabelle Guaïtella, Christian Cavé, and Gabrielle Konopczynski, 321–328. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J
1982 Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther
2002 Imaginary Trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive Interaction in Criminal Courts. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2006 “Questions in Legal Monologues: Fictive Interaction as Argumentative Strategy in a Murder Trial.” Text & Talk 26 (3): 383–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Fictive Interaction Blends in Everyday Life and Courtroom Settings.” In Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction, ed. by Todd Oakley, and Anders Hougaard, 79–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prospero, Michele
2003 Lo Stato in Appalto: Berlusconi e la Privatizzazione del Politico. Manni: San Cesario di Lecce.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Leonardo Fogassi, and Vittoria Gallese
1996 “Mirrors in the Mind.” Scientific American November: 54–61.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Corrado Sinigaglia
2006 Mirrors in the Brain: How our Minds Share Actions and Emotions (translated by Frances Anderson). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1975 “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1041: 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Mario
1988 “Intonation in Italian.” In Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, ed. by Daniel Hirst, and Albert Di Cristo, 219–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jeffereson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheidlower, Jesse
2008 “What Kind of Accent does Sarah Palin Have? Wasillan, actually.” Slate [URL] (Retrieved July 6, 2011).Google Scholar
Schön, Donald, and Martin Rein
1995 Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André
2002 L’illusion Populiste. Paris: Berg International.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(ed.) 1982 Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarchi, Marco
2003 L’Italia Populista: Dal Qualunquismo ai Girotondi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Taviss Thomson, I
2010 Culture Wars and Enduring American Dilemmas. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R
1995 [1989] Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ter Wal, Jessika
2002 “Anti-Foreigner Campaigns in the Austrian Freedom Party and Italian Northern League: The Discursive Construction of Identity.” In The Haider Phenomenon in Austria, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Anton Pelinka, 157–178. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.Google Scholar
Westen, Drew
2007 The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical Investigations (translated by G.E.M. Anscombe). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2003 “Populist Discourses: The Rhetoric of Exclusion in Written Genres.” Document Design 4 (2): 132–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwets, Martine
2009 The Point at Issue: Personal Pronouns. MA thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Bulgakova, Yulia, Veronika Shabanova & Anastasiya Eliseeva
2018. The Language of Leadership: Analyzing Public Speeches of Presidents (Literature Review). In Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education [Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, ], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Debras, Camille
2021. How to prepare the video component of the Diachronic Corpus of Political Speeches for multimodal analysis. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher & Bodo Winter
2022. Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage. Discourse & Society 33:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Isaeva, Snezhana Nikolaevna
2020. Communicative Evasion Strategy in Television Discourse: Issues of Analysis. Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :7 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Ming
2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler
2016. Fictive interaction and the conversation frame. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
van Leeuwen, Maarten
2019. Chapter 12. Measuring people-centrism in populist political discourse. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 83], ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi [Figurative Thought and Language, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.