Cognitive categorization is an indispensable instrument for organizing human experience. Owing to the obvious appeal of clear-cut categories in ideological discourse, polarization frequently serves as a strategy of political persuasion. The success of such rhetoric corroborates the allure of dichotomies, although they blatantly contradict the fuzzy nature of cognitive categories. Since prototypicality yields a great cognitive effect but demands only little processing effort, prototypes are particularly convenient in political speeches, where speakers must often get their message across to a wide and heterogeneous audience in a limited time span. Along these lines, the analysis of 32 presidential speeches from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush brings to light how the prototypical enemy or national hero is established. This paper aims to show that political rhetoric does not merely reflect existing categorizations but also has the power to shape and perpetuate them in the minds of the target audience.
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson (eds). 1990. Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward W. Said. 1999. Acts of Aggression: Policing “Rogue” States. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Cockcroft, Robert, and Susan Cockcroft. 2005. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collins, John, and Ross Glover. 2002. “Introduction.” In Collateral Language: A User’s Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins, and Ross Glover, 1–13. New York: New York University Press.
Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. Alan. 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed., ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62–86. London: Sage.
Dörner, Andreas. 1993. “Zur rhetorischen Konstruktion politisch-kultureller Identitäten: Selbst- und Fremdbilder in zwei Reden Ronald Reagans.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 285–305. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fergusson, Rosalind (ed.). 1992. Penguin Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms. London: Penguin.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2007. “Where does Prototypicality Come from?” In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken, 168–185. London: Equinox.
Goetsch, Paul. 1993. “Kriegsbotschaften amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 73–96. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “Persuasion by Inference: Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 121–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George. 1991. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.”Viet Nam Generation Journal & Newsletter 3 (3) 〈[URL]〉 (Last Accessed February 20, 2011).
Lazar, Annita, and Michelle M. Lazar. 2008. “Discourse of Global Governance: American Hegemony in the Post-Cold War Era.”Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 228–246.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.”Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112.
Llorente, Marina A. 2002. “Civilization versus Barbarism.” In Collateral Language: A User’s Guide to America’s New War, ed. by John Collins, and Ross Glover, 39–51. New York: New York University Press.
Mulholland, Joan. 1994. Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London: Routledge.
Murphy, John M. 2003. “‘Our Mission and Our Moment’: George W. Bush and September 11th.”Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6 (4): 607–632.
Reardon, Kathleen Kelley. 1991. Persuasion in Practice. Newbury Park: Sage.
Reisigl, Martin. 2008. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 243–269. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rosch, Eleanor. 2000. “Categorization.” In Handbook of Pragmatics: 1998. Installment, ed. by Jef Verschuerenet al., 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Smith, Craig Allen, and Kathy B. Smith (eds). 1994. The White House Speaks: Presidential Leadership as Persuasion. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication & Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stüwe, Klaus, and Birgit Stüwe (eds). 2005. American Political Speeches. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic Categorization. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulis, Jeffrey K. 1987. The Rhetorical Presidency. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.”Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Volmert, Johannes. 1993. “Die Kriegsbotschaft als Justification Speech: Argumentation und Benennungsstrategien in Bushs Fernsehrede vom 16.1.1991.” In Die Rhetorik amerikanischer Präsidenten seit F.D. Roosevelt, ed. by Paul Goetsch, and Gerd Hurm, 329–352. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Waldman, Michael (ed.). 2003. My Fellow Americans: The Most Important Speeches of America’s Presidents: From George Washington to George W. Bush. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc. [incl. Audio-CDs].
Wawra, Daniela. 2008. “‘America at its Best’: The Discursive Construction of American Identity in the Inaugural Addresses of US-Presidents since 1789.” In Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings, ed. by Klaus Stierstorfer, 455–466. Trier: WVT.
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “The Contribution of Critical Linguistics to the Analysis of Discriminatory Prejudices and Stereotypes in the Language of Politics.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 291–315. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Gayoso, Albina
2023. Introduction. In Understanding Political Public Relations Techniques, ► pp. 1 ff.
Demir, Mehmet Özer, Biagio Simonetti, Murat Alper Başaran & Sezgin Irmak
2021. Voter Classification Based on Susceptibility to Persuasive Strategies: A Machine Learning Approach. Social Indicators Research 155:1 ► pp. 355 ff.
Yang, Wenhui
2020. News Discourse and Cognitive Studies. In A Cross-Cultural Study of Commercial Media Discourses, ► pp. 9 ff.
Abdelzaher, Esra’ M. & Bacem A. Essam
2019. Weaponizing words. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 893 ff.
Schubert, Christoph
2019. ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 438 ff.
Schubert, Christoph
2021. Multimodal cohesion in persuasive discourse: A case study of televised campaign advertisements in the 2020 US presidential election. Discourse, Context & Media 43 ► pp. 100537 ff.
2017. ‘BENEFICIARY’ AS A MEANS FOR A DICHOTOMOUS REPRESENTATION IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.