Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 13:3 (2014) ► pp.512–537

Variation and continuity in intertextual rhetoric

From the “War on Terror” to the “Struggle against Violent Extremism”

| Carnegie Mellon University |
This article employs critical intertextual analysis (CIA) to examine how American presidents from opposing political parties respectively inaugurated and extended the war in Afghanistan. After explaining the CIA framework, I investigate two post-9/11 “call-to-arms” speeches delivered by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. I find that Obama responds to changing circumstances (e.g. public dissatisfaction) by varying stylistic elements of Bush’s rhetoric. Nevertheless, he rearticulates the overarching features of Bush’s “war on terror” discourse. Thus, Obama ultimately achieves policy continuity, but only by employing micro-rhetorical strategies that create the appearance of change. I conclude that, if Obama had been more enterprising, he might have enacted real change – and broken completely with Bush’s rhetoric and policy of global war.
Keywords: Afghanistan, Bush, critical intertextual analysis, Iraq, Obama, recontextualization, thematic formation, war on terror
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Intertextuality, recontextualization, and transformation
  • 3.Analytic method: Critical intertextual analysis
  • 4.Contextualizing Obama’s “rhetorical shift”
    • 4.1U.S. Intervention and global dominance
    • 4.2President Bush’s address – September 20, 2001
    • 4.3President Obama’s speech – December 1st, 2009
  • 5.Analysis: Variation and continuity between Bush and Obama
    • 5.1Authorization for war: Enacting presidential ethos
    • 5.2“Us” and “Them”: Moralized lexis
    • 5.3The coming military campaign: Re-Envisioning global war
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.3.07odd
References (33)
References
Agiesta, Jennifer, and Jon Cohen. 2009, 20 August. “Public Opinion in U.S. Turns Against Afghan War.” The Washington Post. Retrieved July 5, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew. 2010. Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: ­Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Brennan, John O. 2009, 6 August. “A New Approach to Safeguarding Americans.” whitehouse.gov. Retrieved August 22, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2001, 21 September. “Transcript of President Bush’s Address.” CNN.com Retrieved July 5, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2008. Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ditz, Jason. 2012, May 20. “Three Weeks Later, Obama’s 2024 Pact Already Forgotten in Media.” antiwar.com. Retrieved December 3, 2012 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia. 2009. “‘9/11 Changed Everything’: An Intertextual Analysis of the Bush ­Doctrine.” Discourse & Society 20 (2): 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K., and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional ­Grammar. London: Hodder Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Adam. 2008. “The Politics of Recontextualization: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq.” Discourse & Society 19 (4): 483–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the ­Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. New York: Oxford UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Nadia Khatib, and Theresa Capelos. 2002. “The Polls-Trends: Reactions to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.” Public Opinion Quarterly 661: 418–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivie, Robert L. 1980. “Images of Savagery in American Justifications for War.” Communication Monographs 47 (4): 279–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivie, Robert L., and Oscar Giner. 2009. “American Exceptionalism in a Democratic Idiom: Transacting the Mythos of Change in the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” Communication Studies 60 (4): 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, David. 2009, 3 December. “Obama Reaches 40.8M on Afghanistan – Including Many Fox Viewers.” USA Today. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2011. “Culture, Identity and Hegemony: Continuity and (the Lack of) Change in US Counterterrorism Policy from Bush to Obama.” International Politics 48 (2/3): 390–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1992. “Intertextuality and Educational Research.” Linguistics and Education 4 (3/4): 257–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.” Text 18 (2): 143–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.R., and David Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.R., and Peter R.R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in ­English, 2nd. ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Greg. 2012, February 7. “CIA Digs In as Americans Withdraw from Iraq, Afghanistan.” The Washington Post.Google Scholar
Montopoli, Brian. 2009, 9 December. “Poll: Americans Back Troop Surge, Oppose Withdrawal Date.” cbsnews.com. Retrieved July 8, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009, 1 December. “Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on the Way Forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” Retrieved May 5, 2010 from, [URL].
Oddo, John. 2011. “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four U.S. Presidential addresses.” Discourse & Society 22 (3): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shane, Scott, Mark Mazzetti, and Robert F. Worth. 2010, 14 August. “Secret Assault on Terrorism Widens on Two Continents.” The New York Times. Retrieved August 20, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Stahl, Roger. 2009. “Why We ‘Support the Troops’: Rhetorical Evolutions.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 12 (4): 533–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 1991. Social Semiotics as Praxis. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Trew, Tony. 1979. “Theory and Ideology at Work.” In Language and Control, ed. by Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 94–116. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, Lawrence. 2009, 4 December. “Obama’s Choice ‘Pure Politics.’” Interview by Paul Jay. The Real News Network. Retrieved January 23, 2012 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Zinn, Howard. 2008. “The Obama Difference.” The Progressive. Retrieved August 22, 2010 from, [URL].Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Phillips, Lawrie & Maha Ghalwash
2021. Brothers in arms: Visual commonalities between US and IS recruitment strategies. Media, War & Conflict 14:4 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Ponce, Marcelo Fabián
2018. Verdad y política de Hannah Arendt en la era de la posverdad (Hannah Arendt's Truth and Politics in the Post-Truth Era). SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Trenta, Luca
2018. The Obama administration’s conceptual change: Imminence and the legitimation of targeted killings. European Journal of International Security 3:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Hatton, Arthur T. & Michael E. Nielsen
2016. ‘War on Terror’ in our backyard: effects of framing and violent ISIS propaganda on anti-Muslim prejudice. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 8:3 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.