The “Illegal alien” as a category of analysis
A methodological intervention
“Illegal alien,” as a category of analysis, should be understood primarily as a discursive formation, yet the emergence and spread of the category in public debate cannot be explained by its discursive qualities. Failing to see this has analytical consequences: it results in a constant sidetracking of the question of why illegality itself came to be a central issue, and in a reification of the category. This paper is intended as a methodological intervention aimed at solving these issues. The first part illustrates the absence of a strict legalistic basis for the category, and reviews key works that fail to incorporate this into their conceptual design. The second part, contrasts two periods of time in U.S. political debate – the mid-2000s when the category was dominant, and the 1930s when the category, albeit pushed by elites, failed to become central- suggesting the need for a discursive analysis that goes beyond discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Defining the category of analysis
- 3.Discourse analysis beyond discourse
- 4.Illegality consolidated
- 5.Before the consolidation of “Illegality”
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (43)
References
American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born. 1936. A Dangerous Woman: Stella Petrosky Held for Deportation. New York: American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born.
Ackerman, Edwin. 2014. “‘What Part of Illegal Don’t You Understand?:’ Bureaucracy and Civil Society in the Shaping of the Immigration Debate in the U.S.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (2).
Aizenman, N.C., and Spencer S. Hsu. 2007. “Activist’s Arrest Highlights Key Immigrant Issue: She is Deported; Son is Left Behind.” The Washington Post August 21, 2007, A05.
Andreas, Peter. 2000. Border Games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Archdeacon, Thomas. 1983. Becoming American: An Ethnic History. U.S.: Free Press.
Brown-Waite, Virginia. 2006. “No Amnesty for Illegal Aliens.” Congressional Record 152 (109). September 7, 2006. Accessed through: ([URL])
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calavita, Kitty. 1996. “The New Politics of Immigration: ‘Balanced-Budget Conservatism’ and the Symbolism of Proposition 187.” Social Problems 43 (3): August 1996, 284–305.
Columbia Law Review. 1925. “Outstanding Features of the Immigration Act of 1924.” Columbia Law Review 25 (1): January 1925, 90–95.
De Genova, Nicholas. 2002. “Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 2002 (31):419–447.
De Genova, Nicholas. 2005. Working the Boundaries: Race, Space, and ‘Illegality’ in Mexican Chicago. U.S.: Duke University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Inda, Jonathan Xavier. 2006. Targeting Immigrants: Government, Technology, and Ethics. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1927. Annual Report.
Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1973. Annual Report.
Interagency Task Force on Immigration Policy. 1979. Staff Report, March 1979, Departments of Justice, Labor and State.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.
Laitin, David. 1986. Hegemony and Culture: Politics and Religious Change among the Yoruba. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. U.S.: Basic Books.
Los Angeles Times. 1904. “The Undesirable Alien.” Los Angeles Times January3, 1904, E8.
Massey, Douglass, Jorge Durand, and Noland Malone. 2002. Beyond Smoke and Mirrors: Mexican Immigration in an Era of Economic Integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mehan, Hugh. 1997. “The Discourse of the Immigration Debate: A Case Study in the Politics of Representation.” Discourse and Society 8 (2): 249–270.
Nevins, Joseph. 2002. Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise Of The “Illegal Alien” And The Making Of The U.S.- Mexico Boundary. New York and London: Routledge.
Ngai, Mai. 2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Neuman, Gerald. 1993. “The Lost Century of American Immigration Law (1776–1875).” Columbia Law Review 93 (8):1833–1901.
Neuman, Gerald. 1995. “Aliens as Outlaws: Government Services, Proposition 187, and the Structure of Equal Protection Doctrine.” UCLA Law Review 42 (6):1425–1452.
Newton, Lina. 2008. Illegal, Alien, or Immigrant: The Politics of Immigration Reform. New York: NYU Press.
Perry Clark, Jane. 1969 [1931]. Deportation of Aliens from the United States to Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rak, Mary Kidde. 1938. Border Patrol. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press.
Reed, David. 1924. “Our New Nordic Immigration Policy.” Literary Digest. May 10, 1924, 12–13.
Sahlins, Marshall. 1978. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sanders, Debra. 2007. “Arellano’s Overdue Departure,” San Francisco Chronicle, August 21, 2007. Accessed through [URL].
De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1986. Course in General Linguistics. U.S.: Open Court Sensenbrenner, James. 2006. “US Citizenship Not For Sale.” Accessed through: ([URL])
Sewell, William H. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Torpey, John. 2000. The Invention of The Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevor, John. 1924. “An Analysis of the American Immigration Act of 1924.” International Conciliation. September, No. 202. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
US Congressional Hearing. 2006. “Should We Embrace the Senate’s Grant of Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Aliens and Repeat the Mistakes of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986?” Hearing before the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, July 18th, 2006.
U.S. Department of State “The Immigration Act of 1924 (the Johnson-Reed Act)” accessed through: ([URL]).
U.S. Senate Committee on Immigration. 1934. “Deportation of Criminals” February 24, 29, and March 3, 1934.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Brown, Hana E & Michelle S Dromgold-Sermen
2022.
Borders, Politics, and Bounded Sympathy: How U.S. Television News Constructs Refugees, 1980–2016.
Social Problems
Fowler, Randall
2018.
“Caliphate” against the Crown: Martyrdom, Heresy, and the Rhetoric of Enemyship in the Kingdom of Jordan.
Rhetoric and Public Affairs 21:1
► pp. 117 ff.
Olvera, Jacqueline
2016.
The State, Unauthorized Mexican Migration, and Vulnerability in the Workplace.
Sociology Compass 10:2
► pp. 132 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.