Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 14:2 (2015) ► pp.258–284

Deliberations in the Turkish parliament

The external perceptions of European foreign policy

 | Sabancı University |
 | Süleyman Şah University |
Parliamentarians find themselves engaged in political struggle through the medium of language and constrained by their own rhetoric. These parliamentary debates reveal political perceptions. The external perceptions about the European Union emerge as a relatively understudied topic in political science. This brings forth the following question; how is the European Union and its foreign policy perceived externally? This paper focuses on one particular country, Turkey and the political deliberations within the Turkish Parliament, in order to assess the external perceptions of the EU. The paper analyzes the political debate in Turkey through an investigation of the proceedings of the Turkish Parliament, the legislature in Turkish politics, from 1998 to 2012. The proceedings in the Turkish Parliament enable us to analyze the different political camps’ positions by looking into their deliberations on the European foreign policy thoroughly. This analysis enables us to uncover the Turkish view on the European foreign policy.
Keywords: political discourse, deliberations, Common Foreign and Security Policy, European Foreign Policy, Enlargement and Turkey
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The External Perceptions Of The European Union As A Global Player
    • 2.2Turkey, the European Union, and the political cleavages in the Turkish Parliament
    • 2.2Parliamentary deliberations
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.04muf
References (51)
References
Aggestam, Lisbeth. 2004. “Role Identity and the Europeanisation of Foreign Policy: A Political-Cultural Approach.” InRethinking European Union Foreign Policy, ed. by Ben Tonra, and Thomas J. Christensen, 81–98. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Special Issue-Ethical Power Europe.” International Affairs 84 (1): 1–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batstone, Robert F. 1995. “Grammar in Discourse: Attitude and Deniability.” In Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics, ed. by Guy Cook, and Barbara Seidlhofer, 197–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul. 2004. Cross Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bendiek, Annegret. 2012. “European Realism in the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy.” In EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, ed. by Paul James Cardwell, 35–57. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher J. 2011. European Union Foreign Policy: From Effectiveness to Functionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2007. “Venus Approaching Mars? The EU as an Emerging Civilian World Power.” Paper prepared for the Bi-Annual Conference of the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) . Montreal, Canada, 17-19 May.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dûchene, François. 1973. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community, ed. by Jack M. Kohnstamm, and William Hager, 1–21. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough. Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. 2001. “Constructing an Ethical Foreign Policy: Analysis and Practice from Below.” In Ethics and Foreign Policy ed. by Karen E. Smith, and Margot Light, 129–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Tuomas. 2011. “Normative Power Once Again: A Conceptual Analysis of an Ideal Type.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (6): 1183–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1959. “Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Content Analysis.” InTrends in Content Analysis, ed. by Ithiel de Sola Pool, 7–32. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hyde-Price, Adrian. 2006. “Normative Power Europe: A Realist Critique.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Analytical Perspectives on Parliamentary and Extra-Parliamentary discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (4): 879–884. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kesgin, Barıs, and Juliet Kaarbo. 2010. “When and How Parliaments Influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision.” International Studies Perspectives 11 (1): 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keukeleire, Stephan. 2010. “European Security and Defence Policy: From Taboo to a Spearhead of EU Foreign Policy?” In The Foreign Policy of the European Union: Assessing Europe's Role in the World, ed. by Federiga Bindi, 51–73. Washington: The Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Keukeleire, Stephan, and Jennifer MacNaughtan. 2008. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Simon, and Jon Burchell. 2005. “The European Union and the World Summit on Sustainable Development: Normative Power Europe in Action?” Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (1): 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucarelli, Sonia, and Lorenzo Fioramonti (eds). 2010. External Perceptions of the EU as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manners, Ian. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 20 (2): 235–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Global Europa: Mythology of the European Union in World Politics.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (1): 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren, and Meltem Müftüler-Baç. 2003. “Turkish Parliamentarians’ Perspectives on Turkey’s Relations with the EU.” Turkish Studies 4 (1): 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. 2000. “Turkey’s Role in the European Union’s Security and Foreign Policies.” Security Dialogue 31 (4): 489-502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The EU’s Internal Dynamics.” International Studies Perspectives 9 (2): 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Turkish Foreign Policy Change, its Domestic Determinants and the Role of the European Union.” South East European Politics and Society 16 (2): 279–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Öniş, Ziya. 2000. “Luxembourg, Helsinki and Beyond: Turkey-EU Relations.” Government and Opposition 35 (4): 463–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Powlick, Philip J. 1995. “The Sources of Public Opinion for American Foreign Policy Officials.” International Studies Quarterly 391: 427–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raunio, Tapio, and Matti Wiberg. 2001. “Parliamentalizing Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Finland in the European Union.” Cooperation and Conflict 36 (1): 61–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan, and Erik R. Tillman. 2002. “Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 810–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sjursen, Helene. 2011a. “The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Quest for Democracy.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (8): 1069–1077. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Not So intergovernmental after all? On Democracy and Integration in the European Foreign and Security Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (8): 1078–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Karen E. 2000. “The End of Civilian Power EU: A Welcome Demise or Cause for Concern?” International Spectator 23 (2): 11–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tocci, Nathalie. 2007. “Profiling Normative Foreign Policy: The European Union and its Global Partners.” CEPS Working Document No. 279.Google Scholar
Toje, Asle. 2007. “The Consensus-expectations gap: Explaining Europe’s Ineffective Foreign Policy.” Security Dialogue 39 (1): 121–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The European Union as a Small power.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (1): 43–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tonra, Ben. 2011. “Democratic Foundations of EU Foreign Policy: Narratives and Myths of EU Exceptionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (8): 1190–1207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Discourse, Power and Access.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 84–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 93–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. Van Dijk. 2000. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava-Verlag.Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 1995. “Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (3): 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990 Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whitman, Richard G. 1998. From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zachary, Selden. 2010 “Power is Always in Fashion: State-Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (2): 397–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Doğan, Erhan & H. Deniz Genç
2022. An Asset or Liability: Turkey’s Potential in Availing EU Global Actorness. In EU Global Actorness in a World of Contested Leadership, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
GENÇKAL EROLER, Elif & Rahime SÜLEYMANOĞLU KÜRÜM
2021. Türkiye’de Medyadaki “Medenileşme” Algısında Avrupa Temsili: Suriyeli Göçmen Krizi Dönemi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi :69 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.