The party’s over?
Singapore politics and the ‘new normal’
This paper highlights the dynamic nature of the relationship between government and society, drawing on as a case study the changing relationship between the Singapore government and the citizenry. I discuss the conditions under which the People’s Action Party is under pressure to change its style of government,. Following on from this discussion, I make two key points. One, concepts such as habitus and act (
Isin 2008) have been employed to elucidate the nature of citizenship. But they are also relevant to our understanding of government.
Two, the distinction between act and habitus, at least as articulated by
Isin (2008), confuses two ontologically distinct entitiies: a disposition to act, and the action itself. I suggest that this confusion arises in part from Isin’s failure to examine carefully the communicative modes of engagement between the government and the citizenry.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The People’s Action Party and the Politics of Citizenship
- 3.Engaging the Citizenry Over the Years
- 3.1From nation-state to global city
- 3.2Crisis and response
- 3.3Nationalism
- 4.Into the ‘New-Normal’: The 2011 General Elections and After
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (26)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press: Oxford. 

Bohman, James. 1999. “Practical Reason and Cultural Constraint: Agency in Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice.” In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, ed. by Richard Shusterman, 129–52. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

Brooks, Ann, and Lionel Wee. 2014. Consumption, Cities and States: Comparing Singapore with Asian and Western Cities. London: Anthem Press.
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 

Brubaker, Rogers. 1999. “Social Theory as Habitus.” In Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, ed. by Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone, 212–234. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Butler, Judith. 1999. “Performativity’s Social Magic.” In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, ed. by Richard Shusterman, 113–128. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chua, Beng Huat. 1995. Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge. 

Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Gopalakrishnan, R. and Lim, K. 2011. Singapore PM makes rare apology as election campaign heats up. 4 May 2011. [URL] accessed 24 October 2012.
Hill, Michael, and Kwen Fee Lian. 1995. The Politics of Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore. London: Routledge. 

Isin, Engin F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, ed. by Engin F. Isin, and Greg M. Nielsen. London: Zed Books. 

Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Lim, Yi Han, and Lynette Lai. 2013. “Heng: Vibrant Economy Key to New Jobs.” The Straits Times 8 October 2013.
Mauzy, D.K. and Milne, R.S. 2002. Singapore Politics under the People’s Action Party. London: Routledge. 

Mydans, Seth. 2011. Vote forces Singapore’s leader to reconsider style [online]. The New York Times Asia Pacific, 8 May 2011. Available: [URL] [accessed 22 September 2013].
Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 

Reinach, Adolf. 1983. “The Apriori Foundations of Civil Law”. Aletheia 31: 1–142. 

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Smith, Barry. 1990. “Towards a History of Speech Act Theory.” In Speech Acts, Meaning, and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, ed. by Armin Burkhardt (ed.), 29–61. W. de Gruyter: Berlin. 

Stroud, Christopher, and Lionel Wee. 2012. Style, Identity and Literacy: English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 

Teo, Eddie. 2011. “What is the New normal for the Public Service?” Speech by Eddie Teo, Chairman of the Public Service Commission, 5 November 2011; [URL] accessed2 October 2013.
Thompson, John B. 1991. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Language and Symbolic Power, ed. by Pierre Bourdieu, 1–34. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Matijasevich, David
2020.
Populist hangover: Lessons from Southeast Asia.
Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 5:3
► pp. 193 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.