Balkan War of Apologies
After the war in ex-Yugoslavia subsided in the mid-90s, another war – this time a virtual one – broke out: the war of Balkan apologies. It refers to a decade-long series of apologies for participation in the conflict and the crimes committed during the war, as well as demanding the other parties to counter-apologise. The paper analyses all 19 apologies delivered by the top-ranking statesmen for their country’s/nation’s role in the conflict, which were delivered between 2000 and 2010. Their content is critically examined and wider social and political context is taken into account. The analysis points to the strengths and weaknesses of the apologies issued and dwells on their functions and the factors that have shaped them. The conclusion is that although the apologies are lacking in a number of ways, both contents-wise and regarding the manner they were delivered in, they might have been beneficial and could have had a role in reconciliating the ghosts of the past, present and future.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Historical Background
- 3.Theoretical Background
- 3.1Political apologies
- 3.2Critical historical approach to discourse
- 4.Data and Method
- 5.Analysis and Results
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Augoustinos, Martha, Brianne Hastie, and Monique Wright
2011 “
Apologising for Historical Injustice: Emotion, Truth and Identity in Political Discourse”.
Discourse & Society 22 (5): 507-531.
Austin, John
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barkan, Elazar
2000 The Guilt of Bations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Blatz, Craig, Karina Schumann, and Michael Ross
2009 “
Government Apologies for Historical Injustices”.
Political Psychology 30 (2): 219-242.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celermajer, Danielle
2006 “
From the Levinasian Apology to the Political Apology; Reflections on Ethical Politics”. Paper presented to the
Australasian Association of Political Science Conference
, September 2006, 1-21. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
Fairclough, Norman
2005 “
Critical Discourse Analysis”.
Marges Linguistiques 91: 76-94.
Francisco, Rocio Mancebo
2004 “
Illocution and Cognition: The Case of Apologies”.
Cuadernos de investigación filológica 29-301: 249-268.
Harris, Sandra
2006 “
The Pragmatics of Political Apologies”.
Discourse & Society 171: 715-737.
Marrus, Michael
2006 Official Apologies and the Quest for Historical Justice. University of Toronto: Toronto.
Mills, Sara
2004 Discourse. London/New York: Routeledge.
Minow, Martha
2002 Breaking the Cycles of Hatred. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nobles, Melissa
2008 The Politics of Official Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olshtain, Elite
1989 “
Apologies across Languages”. In
Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by
Shoshana Blum-Kulka,
Juliane House, and
Gabriele Kasper, 155-173. Ablex: Norwood.
Smith, Nick
2008 I Was Wrong: The Meaning of Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tavuchis, Nicholas
1991 Mea Culpa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thompson, Janna
2005 “
Apology, Justice and Respect: A Critical Defence of Political Apology”. In
The Age of Apology: Facing up to the Past, ed. by
Gibney Mark, 31-44. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Threadgold, Terry
2003 “
Cultural Studies, Critical Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis: Histories, Remembering and Futures”.
Linguistik Online 141: 5-37.
van Dijk, Teun
2001 “
Critical Discourse Analysis”. In
Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Deborah Schiffrin,
Deborah Tannen, and
Heidi E. Hamilton, 352-371. Oxford: Blackwell.
Weyeneth, Robert
2001 “
The Power of Apology and the Process of Historical Reconciliation”.
The Public Historian 23 (3): 9-38.
Wodak, Ruth
1989 “
Introduction”. In
Language, Power and Ideology, ed. By
Ruth Wodak, XIII-XX. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth
2002 “
Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis”.
Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 361: 5-31.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Berrocal, Martina & Aleksandra Salamurović
Chu, Rong-Xuan & Chih-Tung Huang
2021.
The day after the apology: A critical discourse analysis of President Tsai’s national apology to Taiwan’s indigenous peoples.
Discourse Studies 23:1
► pp. 84 ff.
Dževerdanović Pejović, Milena
2022.
A discourse analysis approach to the concept of the blue economy in Montenegro.
Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 22:4
► pp. 503 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.