Article published In:
Multimodality, Politics and Ideology
Edited by David Machin and Theo van Leeuwen
[Journal of Language and Politics 15:3] 2016
► pp. 304321
References (30)
References
Bennett, Joe. 2013. Chav-spotting in Britain: the representation of social class as private choice. Social Semiotics 23 (1), 146–162.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinctions. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Göran. 2015. Ridicule as a strategy for the recontextualization of the working class: A multimodal analysis of class-making on Swedish reality television. Critical Discourse Studies 12(1), 20–38.
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. New Labour. New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gorbman, Claudia. 1987. Unheard melodies: Narrative Film Music. London: BFI.Google Scholar
Kress, Günther, & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and the Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lawler, Stephanie. 2005. Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities. Sociological Review 531: 429–446.
Levitas, Ruth. 1998. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon. 2010. Dynamics of social class contempt in contemporary British television comedy. Social Semiotics 20 (2), 121–138.
Lyle, Samantha A. 2008. (Mis)recognition and the middle-class/bourgeois gaze: A case study of Wife Swap. Critical Discourse Studies 5 (4): 319–330.
Machin, David. 2010. Analysing popular music: Image, Sound, text. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 10 (4), 347–355.
Machin, David, and Mayr, Andrea. 2012. How to do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Machin, David. & Mayr, Andrea. 2013. Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: an analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images. Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4), 356–372.
Machin, David, & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Global Media Discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, Winfried. 2003. Disgust: Theory, and history of strong sensation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Miller, William. 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Bill. 2001. Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Östberg, Kjell, & Andersson, Jenny. 2013. Sveriges Historia 1965–2012 [The History of Sweden 1965–2012]. Stockholm Norstedts förlag.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2005. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skeggs, Beverly. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation. Sociology 391, 965–982.
Skeggs, Beverly, & Wood, Helen. 2011. Introduction: Real class. In Reality television and class, ed. by Helen Wood, and Beverly Skeggs, 1–29. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tyler, Imogen. 2008. “Chav mum chav scum”: Class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies 81, 17–34.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. & Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Williams, Raymond. 1961. The Long Revolution. London: Chatto & Windus. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wingstedt, Johnny, Brändström, Sture, and Berg, Jan. 2010. Narrative Music, Visuals and Meaning in Film, Visual Communication 9 (2), 192–210.
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Daly, John Scott
2024. The selective foregrounding of social structures in factual welfare television: a multimodal analysis. Social Semiotics 34:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Wei
2024. Managing compassion: The affective dynamics of rural representation in the Chinese reality TV show X-Change. Television & New Media 25:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Yi
2024. Blame and Responsibility Assignments in Fast Fashion-Triggered Environmental Injustice: A Case Study of Eco-Documentaries. Environmental Communication 18:6  pp. 780 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Wei & Margreth Lünenborg
2023. Weaving the network of collectivism –Kuqingas affective glue in China: Analyzing the reality showX-Change. European Journal of Cultural Studies 26:6  pp. 916 ff. DOI logo
Eriksson, Göran
2022. Promoting extreme fitness regimes through the communicative affordances of reality makeover television: a multimodal critical discourse analysis. Critical Studies in Media Communication 39:5  pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Varga, Balázs
2021. Everybody Is a Fool: Rural Life, Social Order and Carnivalesque Marginalisation in a Hungarian Television Series. In Mediated Shame of Class and Poverty Across Europe,  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Łuczaj, Kamil
2021. Doznawanie klasy w perspektywie mikrosocjologicznej. Przypadek pracowników naukowych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 17:2  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Er, Ibrahim
2020. The voiceless in The Voice: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Text & Talk 40:6  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Aitaki, Georgia
2019. Laughing with / at the national self: Greek television satire and the politics of self-disparagement. Social Semiotics 29:1  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Jontes, Dejan & Andreja Trdina
2018. Ridiculing the working-class body in post-socialist sitcom. Comedy Studies 9:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Lindell, Johan & Jan Fredrik Hovden
2018. Distinctions in the media welfare state: audience fragmentation in post-egalitarian Sweden. Media, Culture & Society 40:5  pp. 639 ff. DOI logo
Eriksson, Göran, Leonor Camauër & Yuliya Lakew
2017. Ordinary People on Television. Nordicom Review 38:2  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.