Cover not available
Article published In:
Multimodality, Politics and Ideology
Edited by David Machin and Theo van Leeuwen
[Journal of Language and Politics 15:3] 2016
► pp. 337–351

Mike the Knight in the neo-liberal era

A multimodal approach to children’s multi-media entertainment

 | Konstfack University College of Arts, Crafts and Design, Sweden
 | Mälardalen University, Sweden
 | Stockholm University, Sweden
Goal-oriented learning seems to be a ubiquitous demand for almost all kind of play activities today. This demand, the article argues, is related to a specific neo-liberal discourse about the “superchild”. The article shows how this discourse is articulated multimodally in a number of media texts aimed at young children based around a trans-medial brand; Mike the Knight.
Keywords: Children, discourse, multimodality, popular culture, apps
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A framework for analysis
  • 3.Discourses about children and childhood
  • 4.Analysis of media texts related to Mike the Knight
    • 4.1Meet Mike - app for tablets and smartphones
    • 4.2Potion Practice and other online games
    • 4.3The Chivalrous Reward Chart
  • 5.Conclusion: a trans-medial kit for construing ‘superchildren’
  • References
Published online: 4 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.3.07lin
References (21)
References
Aarseth, Espen. 2006. “The Culture and Business of Cross-Media Productions”, Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture, 4 (3), 203–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apperley, Thomas H. 2006. “Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video games genres”, Simulation & Gaming, 37 (1), 6–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danielsson, Kristina. & Selander, Staffan. 2014. Se Texten! Multimodala Texter i Ämnesdidaktiskt Arbete [See The Text! Multimodal texts in Subject Didactic Work]. Malmö: Gleerups.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1969/1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert. & Kress, Gunther. 1988. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Holmer Nadesan, Majia. 2002. “Engineering the Entrepreneurial Infant: Brain Science, Infant Development Toys, and Governmentality”, Cultural Studies, 16(3), 401–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hultqvist, Kenneth. 1998. “A History of the Present on Children’s Welfare in Sweden: From Fröbel to Present-Day Decentralization Projects”. In Foucault’s Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education, ed. by Popkewitz, Thomas S. and Brennan, Marie, 91–116. New York and London: Teachers College.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Kaščák, Ondrej. & Pupala, Branislav. 2013. “Buttoning up the Gold Collar - The Child in Neoliberal Visions of Early Education and Care”, Human Affairs, 231, 319–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther. & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 1996/2006. Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lansworthy, Billy. 2013. ‘Be a Knight, Do It Right’ campaign backs new Mike the Knight series. Online resource available at [URL]. Accessed 2015-08-07.
Lemke, Jay. 2004. “Critical Analysis across Media: Games, Franchises and the New Cultural Order”. Conference paper presented at the First International Conference on CDA, Valencia, Spain. Online resource: [URL]. Accessed 2014-04-14.
Lindstrand, Fredrik. Insulander, Eva. & Selander, Staffan. 2016 (Accepted). “Multimodal Representations of Gender in Children's Trans-medial Popular Culture”, Mediekultur. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Seumas. 2014. "Social Institutions", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <[URL]>.
Selander, Staffan. 2008. “Designs for Learning - A Theoretical Perspective”, Designs for Learning, 1(1), 10–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Conceptualization of Multimodal and Distributed Designs for Learning”. In The Futures of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Designs for Emerging Pedagogies, ed. by Gros, Begoña. Kinshuk and Maina, Marcelo, 97–113. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London: Springer.Google Scholar
Selander, Staffan. & Kress, Gunther. 2010. Design för Lärande. Ett Multimodalt Perspektiv [Designs for Learning. A Multimodal Perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Street, Brian. 2004. “Academic literacies and the ‘new orders’: implications for research and practice in student writing in higher education”, Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(1), 9–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waldron, Esther. 2013. Mike the Knight reveals Chivalrous Code to download. Online resource available at [URL]. Accessed 2015-08-07.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Engel, Juliane & Benjamin Jörissen
2022. Schule und Medialität. In Handbuch Schulforschung, ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Engel, Juliane & Benjamin Jörissen
2022. Schule und Medialität. In Handbuch Schulforschung, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Selander, Staffan
2022. The Role of Bodily Experience for Learning Designs. In The Palgrave Handbook of Embodiment and Learning, ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Danielsson, Kristina & Staffan Selander
2021. Introduction. In Multimodal Texts in Disciplinary Education, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.