While stock photographs have come to saturate media and have been mocked for their clichéd nature, for example where women are pictured laughing alone with salad, a powerful corporation like Getty Images that disseminates commercial imagery globally has sought to challenge these stereotypes by making more politicized images. This article examines one such case, that is, Getty’s Genderblend visual trend, which claims to portray gender identities and relations in ways that are both more inclusive and diverse, harnessing feminist theory as part of its promotion. Taking a multimodal discourse and visual design approach, the article looks at how corporate imagery can be styled as political and, in turn, how a politics of difference itself is shaped in the interests of the ideologies of consumer capitalism.
2014 “Special issue: Difference and globalization.” Visual Communication 13(3): 275–285.
Aiello, Giorgia
2013 “Generiche differenze: La comunicazione visiva della soggettività lesbica nell’archivio fotografico Getty Images.” Studi Culturali anno X n. 3: 523–548.
Aiello, Giorgia
2012 “The ‘other’ Europeans: The semiotic imperative of style in Euro Visions by Magnum Photos.” Visual Communication 11(1): 49–77.
Barmada, Nadia
November 19, 2014Creative in Focus | Discover the key 2015 visual trends. Retrieved from: [URL]
Djonov, Emilia, and van Leeuwen, Theo
2011 “The semiotics of texture: From tactile to visual.” Visual Communication 10(4): 541–564.
Fairclough, Norman
2003Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Frosh, Paul
2003The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. Oxford: Berg.
Frosh, Paul
2013 “Beyond the image bank: Digital commercial photography.” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, second edition, ed. by Martin Lister, 131–148. London and New York: Routledge.
June 27, 2014Getty Images a cliché-killer at Cannes. Forbes.com. Retrieved from: [URL]
Seymour, Tom
May 7, 2015Getty and Instagram partner on photography grants worth $10,000. British Journal of Photography. Retrieved from: [URL]
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Wodak, Ruth
1999 “Legitimising immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse Studies,1(1): 83–118.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Aiello, Giorgia, Crispin Thurlow & Lara Portmann
2023. Desocializing Social Media: The Visual and Media Ideologies of Stock Photography. Social Media + Society 9:1 ► pp. 205630512311563 ff.
Aiello, Giorgia & Theo Van Leeuwen
2023. Michel Pastoureau and the history of visual communication. Visual Communication 22:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Albawardi, Areej & Rodney H Jones
2023. Saudi women driving: images, stereotyping and digital media. Visual Communication 22:1 ► pp. 96 ff.
Bogers, Loes, Sabine Niederer, Federica Bardelli & Carlo De Gaetano
2020. Confronting bias in the online representation of pregnancy. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 26:5-6 ► pp. 1037 ff.
Bowie, Anneli
2023. Visualising the Generic Techno-Imaginary: Exploring the Visual Rhetoric of the South African Fourth Industrial Revolution Agenda as Articulated through Commercial Stock Images. de arte 58:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Carrera, Fernanda
2021. Algoritmização de estereótipos raciais em bancos de imagens: a persistência dos padrões coloniais Jezebel, Mammy e Sapphire para mulheres negras. Palabra Clave 24:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
Curran, Ann
2022. Ordinary and Extraordinary Images: Making Visible the Operations of Stock Photography in Posters Against the Repeal of the 8th Amendment. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 6:1 ► pp. 07 ff.
Kvåle, Gunhild
2023. Critical literacy and digital stock images. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 18:3 ► pp. 173 ff.
Mapes, Gwynne
2020. Marketing elite authenticity: Tradition and terroir in artisanal food discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 34 ► pp. 100328 ff.
McIntyre, Karen, Kyser Lough & Keyris Manzanares
2018. Solutions in the Shadows: The Effects of Photo and Text Congruency in Solutions Journalism News Stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95:4 ► pp. 971 ff.
Mortensen, Tara Marie, Brian P. McDermott & Khadija Ejaz
2023. Measuring Photo Credibility in Journalistic Contexts: Scale Development and Application to Staff and Stock Photography. Journalism Practice 17:6 ► pp. 1158 ff.
Ren, Qumo
2022. Predicting News Engagement on Douyin: The Case of COVID-19 Coverage. In Coping with COVID-19, the Mobile Way, ► pp. 89 ff.
Romele, Alberto
2022. Images of Artificial Intelligence: a Blind Spot in AI Ethics. Philosophy & Technology 35:1
Romele, Alberto & Marta Severo
2023. Microstock images of artificial intelligence: How AI creates its own conditions of possibility. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 29:5 ► pp. 1226 ff.
Runge, Evelyn
2020. THE TRAVELS OF PHOTOGRAPHS WITHIN THE GLOBAL IMAGE MARKET. HOW MONOPOLISATION, INTERCONNECTEDNESS, AND DIFFERENTIATION SHAPE THE ECONOMICS OF PHOTOGRAPHY. photographies 13:3 ► pp. 365 ff.
Sternadori, Miglena & Alan Abitbol
2022. How Male Consumers Respond to “Enlightened Manvertising” Campaigns. Journal of Advertising Research 62:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Sánchez-Querubín, Natalia & Richard Rogers
2018. Connected Routes: Migration Studies with Digital Devices and Platforms. Social Media + Society 4:1 ► pp. 205630511876442 ff.
Thomas, Martin
2021. Multimodality and media archaeology: Complementary optics for looking at digital stuff?. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:2 ► pp. 482 ff.
Thurlow, Crispin
2017. “Forget about the words”? Tracking the language, media and semiotic ideologies of digital discourse: The case of sexting. Discourse, Context & Media 20 ► pp. 10 ff.
Yang, Kaiyu, Klint Qinami, Li Fei-Fei, Jia Deng & Olga Russakovsky
2020. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ► pp. 547 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.