Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:4 (2016) ► pp.468–491

Making English local

Chronotopes in language policy discourse

 | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
This study examines the role of chronotopes in a municipal campaign to make English the official language. Drawing on theories of scale, localism, and chronotopes in discourse, this article traces how 30 town residents situated the English language in local and US history through talk and gesture. By evoking two contrasting chronotopes as they created and interpreted the language policy, people positioned monolingualism as a local tradition and multilingualism as a new, outside threat. Yet these chronotopes of local time and distant time were also recursive and fluid in two key ways. First, the US could be aligned with or against the local, which allowed English-only advocates to simultaneously criticize the nation and appeal to an idealized US past. Second, some critics of the policy reconfigured the chronotopes in order to posit multilingualism as the more authentic local tradition. These moves allowed the people involved to support, redefine and resist the English-only movement.
Keywords: Bakhtin, chronotope, English, English-only movement, discourse, gesture, language ideology, local, language policy, nationalism, scale
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Shifting scales in language policy
  • 3.Overview of the study
    • 3.1Site
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Local language policymaking in action
    • 4.1English as a local tradition
    • 4.2The city in and against the United States
    • 4.3Reconfiguring chronotopes as a mode of resistance
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.4.05flo
References (73)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007a. Language and Social Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Recombinant Selves in Mass Mediated Spacetime.”Language & Communication 27 (3): 320–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Community Survey. 2012. Lino Lakes: Language Spoken at Home. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Applebome, Peter. 2010. “Small New York Town Makes English the Law.” New York Times, May 12.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Peter. 2012. “Language Policy at the Municipal Level.” In Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy, ed. by Bernard Spolsky, 226–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis. 1990. The English-only Question: An official language for Americans? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh (ed). 2005. Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan J. 2004. “Bush’s and Gore’s Language and Gestures in the 2000 US Presidential Debates: A Test Case for Two Models of Metaphors.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (3): 409–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James. 1989. Bilingual Education: History, Politics, Theory, and Practice. Trenton, NJ: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
. 1992. Hold your Tongue: Bilingualism and the Politics of English Only. New York: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Davidson, Deanna. 2007. “East Spaces in West Times: Deictic Reference and Political Self-positioning in a Post-socialist East German Chronotope.” Language & Communication 27 (3): 212–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons. 2010. “Imagined Lives and Modernist Chronotopes in Mexican Nonmigrant Discourse.” American Ethnologist 37 (2): 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Making Immigrants Illegal in Small-Town USA.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21 (1): 35–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Masso, Andrés, Angela Castrechini, and Sergi Valera. 2014. “Displacing Xeno-racism: The Discursive Legitimation of Native Supremacy through Everyday Accounts of ‘Urban Insecurity.’” Discourse & Society 25 (3): 341–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Niki. 2009. “Albertville Adopts English as Official Language.” AL.com (Alabama), June 2.Google Scholar
Duchêne, Alexandre, and Monica Heller (eds.). 2012. Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2011. Paths to Post-Nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horner, Bruce, Min-Zhan Lu, Jacqueline Jones Royster, and John Trimbur. 2011. “Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach.” College English 73 (3): 303–321.Google Scholar
Hult, Francis M. 2010. “Analysis of Language Policy Discourses across the Scales of Space and Time.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021: 7–24.Google Scholar
Jack, Jordynn. 2006. “Chronotopes: Forms of Time in Rhetorical Argument.” College English 69 (1): 52–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David Cassels. 2009. “Ethnography of Language Policy.” Language Policy 8 (2): 139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric J. and David Cassels Johnson. 2015. “Language Policy and Bilingual Education in Arizona and Washington State.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18 (1): 92–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Knezevich, Alison. 2012. “Maryland Counties Seek to Make English Official Language. Baltimore Sun, March 11.Google Scholar
Kotlowitz, Alex. 2007. “Our Town.” New York Times, August 5.Google Scholar
Kremer, Rich. 2014. “Polk County Makes English its Official Language.” Wisconsin Public Radio, January 30.Google Scholar
Lawton, Rachele. 2008. “Language Policy and Ideology in the United States: A Critical Analysis of ‘English Only’ Discourse.” Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, Vol. 21, ed. by Majid Khosravinik and Alexandra Polyzou, 78–103. University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Leeman, Jennifer. 2004. “Racializing Language: A History of Linguistic Ideologies in the US Census.” Journal of Language and Politics 3 (3): 507–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael, and Michael Silverstein. 2012. Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lillis, Theresa, and Mary Jane Curry. 2010. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, Joseph. 2007. “Protecting English in an Anglophone Age.” In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, ed. by Jim Cummins and Chris Davison, 169–183. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marschall, Melissa J., Elizabeth Rigby, and Jasmine Jenkins. 2011. “Do State Policies Constrain Local Actors? The Impact of English Only Laws on Language Instruction in Public Schools.” Publius: The Journal Of Federalism 41 (4): 586–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Stephen. 2001. Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Politics of Language. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
McCarty, Teresa L. (ed). 2011. Ethnography and Language Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Menken, Kate. 2008. English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Money Magazine. 2011. “Best Places to Live.” CNNMoney, December 5.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2010. Language as a Local Practice. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel. 2011. “Language Policy, Tacit Knowledge, and Institutional Learning: The Case of the Swiss Public Service Broadcaster SRG SSR.” Current Issues in Language Planning 12 (3): 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersoo, Pille. 2007. “What Does ‘We’ Mean?: National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language & Politics 6 (3): 419–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari. 2013. “Spatial interaction in Sámiland: Regulative and Transitory Chronotopes in the Dynamic Multilingual Landscape of an Indigenous Sámi Village.” International Journal of Bilingualism 18 (5): 478–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 2012. “‘If English was Good Enough for Jesus…’: Monolinguismo y Mala Fe.” Critical Multilingualism Studies 1 (1): 12–30.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Jody Shipka. 2003. “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.” In Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, ed. by Charles Bazerman and David R. Russell, 180–238. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
ProEnglish. 2007. “Texas Town’s English Ordinance has Teeth.” The ProEnglish Advocate 13 (1): 7–8.Google Scholar
. 2008. “ProEnglish helps Nashville English Initiative Qualify for Ballot.” The ProEnglish Advocate 14 (3): 2.Google Scholar
. 2010. “ProEnglish Fights for Lino Lakes’ Official English Victory.” The ProEnglish Advocate 16 (3): 1.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, Vaidehi, and Brian Morgan. 2007. “TESOL and Policy Enactments: Perspectives from Practice.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (3): 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosario, Ruben. 2011. “Flak aside, English-only Bill is Still Pure Pandering.” St. Paul Pioneer Press (St. Paul, Minnesota), January 22.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 2003. “The Whens and Wheres’-as well as Hows’-of Ethnolinguistic Recognition.” Public Culture 15 (3): 531–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Language Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staub, Andrew. 2010. “Forty Fort Council Rejects English-only Ordinance.” Citizens Voice (Luzerne County, Pennsylvania), September 8.Google Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. 2009. “‘Press 1 for English’: Textual and Ideological Networks in a Newspaper Debate on US Language Policy.” Discourse and Society 20 (2): 265–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. “Enacting and Transforming Local Language Policies.” College Composition and Communication 62 (4): 634–661.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2010. “English Only Spoken Here.” July 16.Google Scholar
Trimbur, John. 2006. “Linguistic Memory and the Politics of U.S. English.” College English 68 (6): 575–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
U. S. Census Bureau. 2010. Lino Lakes QuickFacts. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wiley, Terrence G. 1998. “The Imposition of World War I Era English-only Policies and the Fate of German in North America.” In Language and Politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and Realities, ed. by Thomas Ricento and Barbara Burnaby, 211–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Wilgoren, Jodi. 2002. “Divided by a Call for a Common Language.” New York Times, July 19.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 2008. “Language and Identity Choice in Catalonia: The Interplay of Contrasting Ideologies of Linguistic Authority.” In Lengua, Nacion, e Identidad: La Regulación del Plurilingüismo en España y América Latina, ed. by Kirsten Süselbeck, Ulrike Mühlschlegel, and Peter Masson, pp. 303–323. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert/Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
2013. “Is the Personal Political? Chronotopes and Changing Stances toward Catalan Language and Identity.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (2): 210–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Stanton, and Catherine Rhodes. 2012. “The Production of Relevant Scales: Social Identification of Migrants during Rapid Demographic Change in One American Town.” Applied Linguistics Review 3 (1): 75–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Zeke. 2011. “English-only town law is rescinded in Jackson, N.Y. Revote follows letter from AG.” Bennington Banner (Bennington, Vermont), June 3.Google Scholar
Young, Blaine. 2012. “Interview with Suzanne Bibby.” The Blaine Young Show (Frederick, Maryland), February 22. [URL].
Yuen, Laura. 2012. “English-only Measure still Divides Lino Lakes.” Minnesota Public Radio, March 12.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Djuraeva, Madina
2022. Multilingualism, nation branding, and the ownership of English in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. World Englishes 41:1 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Flowers, Katherine S.
2019. Writing Studies’ Concessions to the English-Only Movement: Revisiting CCCC’s National Language Policy and Its Reception. College Composition & Communication 71:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Flowers, Katherine S.
2021. Upscaling and downscaling: Negotiating scale in the English‐only movement. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Simon, Kaia L.
2019. Translating a Path to College: Literate Resonances of Migrant Child Language Brokering. College Composition & Communication 71:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.