Article published In:
Occupy Hong Kong: Historicizing Protest
Edited by John Flowerdew and Rodney H. Jones
[Journal of Language and Politics 15:5] 2016
► pp. 519526
Alexander, Jeffrey, Bernhard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast
(eds) 2006Social Performance : Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. West Nyack, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, Alexandra Segerberg, and Shawn Walker
2014 “Organization in the Crowd: Peer Production in Large-scale Networked Protests.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (2): 232–260. DOI logo
Bhatia, Aditi
2015Discursive Illusions in Public Discourse: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costanza-Chock, Sasha
2012 “Mic Check! Media Cultures and the Occupy Movement.” Social Movement Studies 11 (3-4): 375–385. DOI logo
DeLuca, Kevin M., Sean Lawson, and Ye Sun
2012 “Occupy Wall Street on the Public Screens of Social Media: The Many Framings of the Birth of a Protest Movement.” Communication, Culture & Critique 5 (4): 483–509. DOI logo
Flowerdew, John
2012Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Christian
2014Occupy Media!: The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism. Hampshire, UK: John Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1994 “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David
2008 “The Right to the City.” New Left Review 531. [URL].
Herbst, Susan
1993Numbered Voices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey S.
2012 “Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space, and Emerging Logics of Aggregation.” American Ethnologist 39 (2): 259–279. DOI logo
Lefebvre, Henri
1991The Production of Space, trans. by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, Justin
2001Constructing Public Opinion. NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael S.
1990Revolution: A Sociological Interpretation. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa
(ed.) 2014Journal of Language and Politics 13 (4).Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, Nicholas
2011The Right to Look. Critical Inquiry 37 (3): 473–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter
2009Theories of Political Protest and Social Movements: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Critique, and Synthesis (1st edn). London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron
2008 “Discourse Itineraries: Nine Processes of Resemiotiation.” In Advances in Discourse Studies, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney Jones, 233–244. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Chen, Fu & Guofeng Wang
Feng, William Dezheng
2017. Ideological dissonances among Chinese-language newspapers in Hong Kong: A corpus-based analysis of reports on the Occupy Central Movement. Discourse & Communication 11:6  pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
Gillen, Julia, Mandy Hoi Man Yu, Gloria Ho Nga Fan & Selena Ho
2020. Literacies remaking public places: the Umbrella Movement of Hong Kong, 2014. Literacy 54:2  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Kent Y.
2017. The Cantonese Linguicide: A Study of Prospective Language Death in Hong Kong. International Journal of Culture and History (EJournal) 3:2  pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Ming, Liu & Jingxue Ma
2022. The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Ming, Liu & Guofeng Wang
2022. An introduction to the special issue on “Language, Politics and Media: The Hong Kong protests”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Guofeng
2022. Britain as a protector, a mediator or an onlooker?. Journal of Language and Politics 21:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Guofeng & Xueqin Ma
2021. Were They Illegal Rioters or Pro-democracy Protestors? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong Protests inChina DailyandThe New York Times. Critical Arts 35:2  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.