This paper studies the Belarusian nation as envisioned by the president in his political speeches delivered on the country’s Independence Day. The theoretical framework of the paper rests upon an understanding of the discursive construction of national identity. This analysis of the presidential speeches utilizes principles of the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA). As a special genre of texts, political speeches aim to offer normative guidance and a sense of societal consensus to the public. The paper reveals that in the construction of a national community in Belarus, the presidential speeches ambiguously refer to historical memory, socio-economic development, the political system and the country’s foreign relations.
2006Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Baranova, Olga
2008 “Nationalism, Anti-Bolshevism or the Will to Survive? Collaboration in Belarus under the Nazi Occupation of 1941–1944.” European Review of History 15 (2): 113–28.
Bekus, Nelly
2010Struggle over Identity. The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness.” Budapest: CEU Press.
“Belarus Country Report.”
2012 Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Benke, Gertraud
2003 “From Prices and Prizes to Outmoded Things. Neutrality and Identity in the Speeches of Austrian Presidents on the National Holiday (26.10.) in the Second Republic.” In NATO, Neutrality and National Identity. The Case of Austria and Hungary, edited by András Kovács and Ruth Wodak, 103–46. Vienna: Böhlau.
Brass, Paul R.
1991Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Brüggemann, Mark
2010 “Koloniales sprachliches Erbe: Sprache und Nation in Lukaschenkas Belarus.” Osteuropa 60 (12): 69–80.
Buhr, Renee L., Victor Shadurski, and Steven Hoffman
2009 “Taiwan and ROC: A Critical Analysis of President Chen Shui-Bien’s Construction of Taiwan Identity in National Speeches.” National Identities 11 (3): 301–30.
Chiari, Bernhard, and Robert Maier
2004 “Volkskrieg und Heldenstädte: Zum Mythos des Großen Vaterländischen Krieges in Weißrußland.” In Mythen der Nationen. 1945 – Arena der Erinnerungen. Katalog zur Ausstellung im Deutschen Historischen Museum Berlin, 737–56. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag.
Distelberger, Teresa, Rudolf de Cillia, and Ruth Wodak
2009 “Österreichische Identitäten in politischen Gedenkreden des Jubiläumsjahres 2005.” In Gedenken im “Gedankenjahr”. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr 2005, edited by Rudolf de Cillia and Ruth Wodak, 29–78. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
Eke, Steven M., and Taras Kuzio
2000 “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 52 (3): 523–47. .
2014 “Historia Magistra Vitae: The Topos of History as a Teacher in Public Struggles over Self- and Other Representation.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.
Goujon, Alexandra
1999 “Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 661–77. .
Goujon, Alexandra
2010 “Memorial Narratives of WWII Partisans and Genocide in Belarus.” East European Politics & Societies 24 (1): 6–25. .
Hansen, Imke
2008 “Die politische Planung der Erinnerung. Geschichtskonstruktion in Belarus zwischen Konflikt und Konsens.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 187–96.
Hobsbawm, Eric
1992 “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2007a “Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity.” East European Politics & Societies 21 (2): 348–81. .
Ioffe, Grigory
2007b “Unfinished Nation-Building in Belarus and the 2006 Presidential Election.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 48 (1): 37–58. .
Klymenko, Lina, and Sergiu Gherghina
2012 “Determinants of Positive Attitudes towards an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Belarus.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 39 (2): 249–69. .
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Laruelle, Marlène
2007 “Wiedergeburt per Dekret. Nationsbildung in Zentralasien.” Osteuropa 8–91: 139–54.
Leshchenko, Natalia
2004 “A Fine Instrument: Two Nation-Building Strategies in Post-Soviet Belarus.” Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 333–52. .
Leshchenko, Natalia
2008 “The National Ideology and the Basis of the Lukashenka Regime in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (8): 1419–33.
Lindner, Rainer
1999 “Forum: New Directions in Belarusian Studies. Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 631–47. .
Linz, Juan José
2000Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Markwick, Roger
2012 “The Great Patriotic War in Soviet and Post-Soviet Collective Memory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, edited by Dan Stone, 692–713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marples, David
1999aBelarus: A Denationalized Nation. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Marples, David
1999b “National Awakening and National Consciousness in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 565–78. .
Marples, David
2006 “Color Revolutions: The Belarus Case.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 391: 351–64.
Marples, David
2009 “Outpost of Tyranny? The Failure of Democratization in Belarus.” Democratization 16 (4): 756–76. .
Marples, David
2012 “History, Memory, and the Second World War in Belarus.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 58 (3): 437–48. .
Matveeva, Anna
2009 “Legitimising Central Asian Authoritarianism: Political Manipulation and Symbolic Power.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (7): 1095–1121.
Özkırımlı, Umut
2010Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisigl, Martin
2009 “Spoken Silences – Bridging Breaks. The Discursive Construction of Historical Continuities and Turning Points in Austrian Commemorative Speeches by Rhetorical Tropes.” In Justice and Memory Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An International Comparison, edited by Ruth Wodak and Gertraud Auer Borea, 213–40. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Reisigl, Martin
2013 “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, 21:349–73. London: Sage.
Reisigl, Martin
2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A Methodological Framework.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
Rentrop, Petra
2004 “Arbeiten an der Erinnerung. Geschichte und kollektives Gedächtnis.” Osteuropa 54 (2): 146–57.
Riach, David
2000 “Nation Building: Identity Politics in Belarus.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 171: 49–63.
Sahm, Astrid
1999 “Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 649–60.
Sahm, Astrid
2008 “Im Banne des Krieges: Gedenkstätten und Erinnerungskultur in Belarus.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 229–45.
2013 “Critical Discourse Analysis: Challenges and Perspectives.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, xix–xliii. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zlotnikov, Leonid
2009 “The Belarusian ‘Economic Miracle’ – Illusions and Reality.” In Back from the Cold? The EU and Belarus in 2009, edited by Sabine Fischer, 65–78. Chaillot Paper, No. 1191. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020. The Main Approaches to CDA/CDS. In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26], ► pp. 155 ff.
Dinerstein, Anton & Todd L. Sandel
2023. “We have a point on the map”: Discursive constructions of Belarusian identity duringCreativeMornings Minsk. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 52:4 ► pp. 440 ff.
Kananovich, Volha
2022. #presidentspartingwords at a Critical Juncture: Reclaiming the Autonomous Subject in Social Media Discourse on Coronavirus in Belarus. Journal of Communication Inquiry 46:3 ► pp. 244 ff.
Panao, Rogelio Alicor L. & Ronald A. Pernia
2022. Fear and Loathing or Strategic Priming? Unveiling the Audience in Duterte's Crime Rhetoric. Journal of East Asian Studies 22:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.