Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 15:6 (2016) ► pp.727–747

Nation-building and presidential rhetoric in Belarus

| University of Eastern Finland
This paper studies the Belarusian nation as envisioned by the president in his political speeches delivered on the country’s Independence Day. The theoretical framework of the paper rests upon an understanding of the discursive construction of national identity. This analysis of the presidential speeches utilizes principles of the Discourse Historical Approach (DHA). As a special genre of texts, political speeches aim to offer normative guidance and a sense of societal consensus to the public. The paper reveals that in the construction of a national community in Belarus, the presidential speeches ambiguously refer to historical memory, socio-economic development, the political system and the country’s foreign relations.
Keywords: Belarus, nation-building, discourse, Discourse Historical Approach, political speeches, rhetoric
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Nationalism and political speeches
  • Foundation of the analysis
  • Political regime and nation-building in Belarus
  • Nation-building and presidential rhetoric
    • Historical memory
    • Socio-economic development
    • Political system
    • Foreign relations
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.6.04kly
References (53)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baranova, Olga. 2008. “Nationalism, Anti-Bolshevism or the Will to Survive? Collaboration in Belarus under the Nazi Occupation of 1941–1944.” European Review of History 15 (2): 113–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bekus, Nelly. 2010. Struggle over Identity. The Official and the Alternative “Belarusianness.” Budapest: CEU Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“Belarus Country Report.” 2012. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Benke, Gertraud. 2003. “From Prices and Prizes to Outmoded Things. Neutrality and Identity in the Speeches of Austrian Presidents on the National Holiday (26.10.) in the Second Republic.” In NATO, Neutrality and National Identity. The Case of Austria and Hungary, edited by András Kovács and Ruth Wodak, 103–46. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul R. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brüggemann, Mark. 2010. “Koloniales sprachliches Erbe: Sprache und Nation in Lukaschenkas Belarus.” Osteuropa 60 (12): 69–80.Google Scholar
Buhr, Renee L., Victor Shadurski, and Steven Hoffman. 2011. “Belarus: An Emerging Civic Nation?” Nationalities Papers 39 (3): 425–40. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Chang, Hui-Ching, and Rich Holt. 2009. “Taiwan and ROC: A Critical Analysis of President Chen Shui-Bien’s Construction of Taiwan Identity in National Speeches.” National Identities 11 (3): 301–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiari, Bernhard, and Robert Maier. 2004. “Volkskrieg und Heldenstädte: Zum Mythos des Großen Vaterländischen Krieges in Weißrußland.” In Mythen der Nationen. 1945 – Arena der Erinnerungen. Katalog zur Ausstellung im Deutschen Historischen Museum Berlin, 737–56. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern Verlag.Google Scholar
Distelberger, Teresa, Rudolf de Cillia, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “Österreichische Identitäten in politischen Gedenkreden des Jubiläumsjahres 2005.” In Gedenken im “Gedankenjahr”. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion österreichischer Identitäten im Jubiläumsjahr 2005, edited by Rudolf de Cillia and Ruth Wodak, 29–78. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
Eke, Steven M., and Taras Kuzio. 2000. “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 52 (3): 523–47. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman L. 2005. “Blair’s Contribution to Elaborating a New ‘Doctrine of International Community.’” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 41–63. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 2002. “Rhetorical Strategies and Identity Politics in the Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal.” Journal of Language and Politics 1 (1): 149–80. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard. 2014. “Historia Magistra Vitae: The Topos of History as a Teacher in Public Struggles over Self- and Other Representation.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Goujon, Alexandra. 1999. “Language, Nationalism, and Populism in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 661–77. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Memorial Narratives of WWII Partisans and Genocide in Belarus.” East European Politics & Societies 24 (1): 6–25. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hansen, Imke. 2008. “Die politische Planung der Erinnerung. Geschichtskonstruktion in Belarus zwischen Konflikt und Konsens.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 187–96.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1992. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions.” In The Invention of Tradition, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ioffe, Grigory. 2003. “Understanding Belarus: Belarussian Identity.” Europe-Asia Studies 55 (8): 1241–72. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2007a. “Culture Wars, Soul-Searching, and Belarusian Identity.” East European Politics & Societies 21 (2): 348–81. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Unfinished Nation-Building in Belarus and the 2006 Presidential Election.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 48 (1): 37–58. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Klymenko, Lina, and Sergiu Gherghina. 2012. “Determinants of Positive Attitudes towards an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Belarus.” The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 39 (2): 249–69. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlène. 2007. “Wiedergeburt per Dekret. Nationsbildung in Zentralasien.” Osteuropa 8–91: 139–54.Google Scholar
Leshchenko, Natalia. 2004. “A Fine Instrument: Two Nation-Building Strategies in Post-Soviet Belarus.” Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 333–52. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The National Ideology and the Basis of the Lukashenka Regime in Belarus.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (8): 1419–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindner, Rainer. 1999. “Forum: New Directions in Belarusian Studies. Besieged Past: National and Court Historians in Lukashenka’s Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 631–47. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan José. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Markwick, Roger. 2012. “The Great Patriotic War in Soviet and Post-Soviet Collective Memory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Postwar European History, edited by Dan Stone, 692–713. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marples, David. 1999a. Belarus: A Denationalized Nation. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1999b. “National Awakening and National Consciousness in Belarus.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 565–78. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Color Revolutions: The Belarus Case.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 391: 351–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Outpost of Tyranny? The Failure of Democratization in Belarus.” Democratization 16 (4): 756–76. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2012. “History, Memory, and the Second World War in Belarus.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 58 (3): 437–48. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Matveeva, Anna. 2009. “Legitimising Central Asian Authoritarianism: Political Manipulation and Symbolic Power.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (7): 1095–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özkırımlı, Umut. 2010. Theories of Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2009. “Spoken Silences – Bridging Breaks. The Discursive Construction of Historical Continuities and Turning Points in Austrian Commemorative Speeches by Rhetorical Tropes.” In Justice and Memory Confronting Traumatic Pasts. An International Comparison, edited by Ruth Wodak and Gertraud Auer Borea, 213–40. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, 21:349–73. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A Methodological Framework.” In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rentrop, Petra. 2004. “Arbeiten an der Erinnerung. Geschichte und kollektives Gedächtnis.” Osteuropa 54 (2): 146–57.Google Scholar
Riach, David. 2000. “Nation Building: Identity Politics in Belarus.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 171: 49–63.Google Scholar
Sahm, Astrid. 1999. “Political Culture and National Symbols: Their Impact on the Belarusian Nation-Building Process.” Nationalities Papers 27 (4): 649–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Im Banne des Krieges: Gedenkstätten und Erinnerungskultur in Belarus.” Osteuropa 58 (6): 229–45.Google Scholar
Shenhav, Shaul. 2005. “Thin and Thick Narrative Analysis. On the Question of Defining and Analyzing Political Narratives.” Narrative Inquiry 15 (1): 75–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuckey, Mary E. 2004. Defining Americans: The Presidency and National Identity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally. Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (1): 65–91. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert. 2002. “Searching for Europe: The Problem of Legitimisation and Representation in Recent Political Speeches on Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics 1 (1): 59–83. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Challenges and Perspectives.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, xix–xliii. Los Angeles: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zlotnikov, Leonid. 2009. “The Belarusian ‘Economic Miracle’ – Illusions and Reality.” In Back from the Cold? The EU and Belarus in 2009, edited by Sabine Fischer, 65–78. Chaillot Paper, No. 1191. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Dinerstein, Anton & Todd L. Sandel
2023. “We have a point on the map”: Discursive constructions of Belarusian identity duringCreativeMornings Minsk. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 52:4 ► pp. 440 ff. DOI logo
Kananovich, Volha
2022. #presidentspartingwords at a Critical Juncture: Reclaiming the Autonomous Subject in Social Media Discourse on Coronavirus in Belarus. Journal of Communication Inquiry 46:3 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Panao, Rogelio Alicor L. & Ronald A. Pernia
2022. Fear and Loathing or Strategic Priming? Unveiling the Audience in Duterte's Crime Rhetoric. Journal of East Asian Studies 22:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh
2020. The Main Approaches to CDA/CDS. In Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 26], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.