Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:2 (2017) ► pp. 285–312

Failures in Leadership

How and Why Wishy-Washy Politicians Equivocate on Japanese Political Interviews

| Doshisha University, Japan
| Waseda University, Japan
| University of York, UK

This paper examines how Japanese leading politicians deal with the communicative problems posed to them during broadcast political interviews. Based on data gathered during 14-month period in 2012–2013, the paper replicates and modifies the “Theory of Equivocation” to explore the extent to which national and local level politicians endeavor to affect the content of information distributed to the public and to influence the way people perceive events that take place in the public domain. Differentiating among selected groups of politicians, i.e., ruling and opposition parties’ members, Cabinet ministers and prime ministers, and local level politicians, the paper focuses on the ways Japanese politicians (and for comparison also nonpoliticians) equivocate during televised programs and the conditions underlying this equivocation, thereby also assesses the significance of these talk shows in the broader context of political communication in Japan.

Keywords: Political interviews, Television, Media discourse, Theory of Equivocation , Political issues, Japan
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Theory of Equivocation
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1The interviews
    • 2.2Procedure
      • Questions
      • Responses
    • 2.3Coding
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Analyzing Hedging Style
    • 3.2Non-Issues and Policy Issues
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 04 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15009.fel
References
Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and & Jennifer Mullett
1990 Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter
2009 “Techniques of Political Interview Analysis.” In Discourse and Politics, ed. by Álvarez-Benito, Gloria, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz, and Isabel M. Íñigo-Mora, 215–228. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter and Kate Mayer
1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interview.” Political Psychology 41: 651–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob
1960 “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Ofer
2004 Talking Politics in Japan Today. Brighton, England: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita, and Peter Bull
2015 “Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 341: 65–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “’Ducking and Diving’: How Political Issues Affect Equivocation in Japanese Political Interviews.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 171: 141–167 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Sten
2015 “Discursive Strategies of Blame Avoidance in Government: A Framework for Analysis.” Discourse & Society 261: 297–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by van Dijk, Teun A., Vol. 31, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas
1986 News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

Failures in Leadership
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita
2019. Ignoring Respect: The Effects of Threat to Face on Replies and the Ensuing Questions During Broadcast Political Interviews in Japan. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:5-6 ► pp. 606 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.