This paper examines how Japanese leading politicians deal with the communicative problems posed to them during broadcast political interviews. Based on data gathered during 14-month period in 2012–2013, the paper replicates and modifies the “Theory of Equivocation” to explore the extent to which national and local level politicians endeavor to affect the content of information distributed to the public and to influence the way people perceive events that take place in the public domain. Differentiating among selected groups of politicians, i.e., ruling and opposition parties’ members, Cabinet ministers and prime ministers, and local level politicians, the paper focuses on the ways Japanese politicians (and for comparison also nonpoliticians) equivocate during televised programs and the conditions underlying this equivocation, thereby also assesses the significance of these talk shows in the broader context of political communication in Japan.
Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil, and & Jennifer Mullett
1990Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Bull, Peter
2009 “Techniques of Political Interview Analysis.” In Discourse and Politics, ed. by Álvarez-Benito, Gloria, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz, and Isabel M. Íñigo-Mora, 215–228. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bull, Peter and Kate Mayer
1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interview.” Political Psychology 41: 651–666.
Cohen, Jacob
1960 “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46.
Feldman, Ofer
2004Talking Politics in Japan Today. Brighton, England: Sussex Academic Press.
Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita, and Peter Bull
2015 “Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 341: 65–89.
Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita, and Peter Bull
2016 “’Ducking and Diving’: How Political Issues Affect Equivocation in Japanese Political Interviews.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 171: 141–167
Hansson, Sten
2015 “Discursive Strategies of Blame Avoidance in Government: A Framework for Analysis.” Discourse & Society 261: 297–322.
Heritage, John
1985 “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by van Dijk, Teun A., Vol. 31, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.
2022. Introduction: Political Interviews—An Analytical Model. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 1 ff.
Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita
2019. Ignoring Respect: The Effects of Threat to Face on Replies and the Ensuing Questions During Broadcast Political Interviews in Japan. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:5-6 ► pp. 606 ff.
Gnisci, Augusto, Margherita Asterope, Rosa Casapulla, Maria D’Agostino & Gaetano Perillo
2022. Threat to Face and Equivocation in Televised Interviews of Italy’s Politicians For and Against the 2016 Constitutional Referendum. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 85 ff.
Isotalus, Pekka
2022. The Finnish “Famous Five” in Television Interviews: Cultural Characteristics of Party Leaders’ Response Style. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 209 ff.
Kinoshita, Ken
2023. The Relationship Between Facial Expressions, Gestures, and Quotations. In Japanese Politicians’ Rhetorical and Indirect Speech, ► pp. 59 ff.
Kinoshita, Ken
2023. Perspectives on Political Rhetoric. In Japanese Politicians’ Rhetorical and Indirect Speech, ► pp. 185 ff.
Maruoka, Chiho & Caroline Rose
2023. How the mighty are fallen: Evaluating Abe Shinzō's leadership capital in crisis. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 8:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.