Public communication practices of executive governments are often criticised by journalists, politicians, scholars, and other commentators. Therefore, government communication professionals routinely adopt various blame avoidance strategies, some of which are meant to ‘stop blame before it starts’ or to reduce their exposure to potential blame attacks. The linguistic aspects of such anticipative strategies are yet to be studied by discourse analysts.
I contribute towards filling this gap by showing how written professional guidelines for government communicators could be interpreted as complex discursive devices of anticipative blame avoidance.
I outline historically and institutionally situated issues of blame that inform the occupational habitus of government communicators in the UK. I bring examples from their propriety guidelines to illustrate how the use of certain discursive strategies limits the possible perceived blameworthiness of individual officeholders. I conclude by explicating the discursive underpinnings of two common operational blame avoidance strategies in government: ‘protocolisation’ and ‘herding’.
2006 “Spin: From Tactic to Tabloid.” Journal of Public Affairs 6 (1): 31–45.
Balfour, Michael
1979Propaganda in War 1939–1945. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boin, Arjen, Paul ‘t Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius
2005The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul ‘t Hart
(eds)2008Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cabinet Office
2012Evaluating Government Communication Activity: Standards and Guidance. Accessed April 30, 2014. [URL].
Cabinet Office
2013Government Communication Professional Competency Framework. Accessed April 30, 2014. https://gcn.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Professional-Communication-Competency-Framework1.pdf.
Cabinet Office
2014Government Communication Service Propriety Guidance. Accessed October 30, 2014. [URL].
Cabinet Office
2015Government Communication Service Handbook. Accessed October 30, 2015. [URL].
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2011Discourse and identity. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 263–282. London: Sage.
Fairclough, Norman
2000New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.
Fournier, Valérie
1999 “The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism.” Social Review 47 (2): 280–307.
Franklin, Bob
1994Packaging Politics: Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democracy. London: Edward Arnold.
Gaber, Ivor
2000 “Government by Spin: an Analysis of the Process.” Media, Culture & Society 22 (4): 507–518.
Gaber, Ivor
2004 “Alastair Campbell, Exit Stage Left: Do the ‘Phillis’ Recommendations Represent a New Chapter in Political Communications or is it ‘Business as Usual’?” Journal of Public Affairs 4 (4): 365–373.
Grant, Mariel
1994Propaganda and the Role of the State in Inter-war Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gregory, Anne
2012 “UK Government Communications: Full Circle in the 21st Century?” Public Relations Review 38 (3): 167–175.
Habermas, Jürgen
1968Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Henneberg, Stephan C., Margaret Scammell, and Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy
2009 “Political Marketing Management and Theories of Democracy.” Marketing Theory 9 (2): 165–188.
Hansson, Sten
2015a “Discursive Strategies of Blame Avoidance in Government: A Framework for Analysis.” Discourse & Society 26 (3): 297–322.
Hansson, Sten
2015b “Calculated Overcommunication: Strategic Uses of Prolixity, Irrelevance, and Repetition in Administrative Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 841: 172–188.
Hood, Christopher
2011The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Jones, Nicholas
1995Soundbites and Spin Doctors: How Politicians Manipulate the Media and Vice Versa. London: Cassell.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George
2008The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-century American Politics with an 18th-century Brain. New York: Penguin Group.
L’Etang, Jacquie
2004Public Relations in Britain: A History of Professional Practice in the 20th Century. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lowe, Rodney
2011The Official History of the British Civil Service. Reforming the Civil Service, volume 1: the Fulton Years 1966–81. London: Routledge.
McNair, Brian
2004 “PR Must Die: Spin, Anti-spin and Political Public Relations in the UK, 1997–2004.” Journalism Studies 5 (3): 325–338.
Merton, Robert K.
1940 “Bureaucratic Structure and Personality.” Social Forces 18 (4): 560–568.
Messinger, Gary S.
1992British Propaganda and the State in the First World War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Moloney, Kevin
2000Rethinking Public Relations: The Spin and the Substance. London: Routledge.
Moloney, Kevin
2006Rethinking Public Relations: PR Propaganda and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Niskanen, William A.
1994Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Ogilvy-Webb, Marjorie
1965The Government Explains. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Quinn, Thomas
2012 “Spin Doctors and Political News Management: A Rational-choice ‘Exchange’ Analysis.” British Politics 7 (3): 272–300.
Reisigl, Martin
2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methodological Framework”. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Chris Hart, and Piotr Cap, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
Sanders, Karen
2013 “The Strategic Shift of UK Government Communication.” In Government Communication: Cases and Challenges, ed. by Karen Sanders, and Maria Jose Canel, 78–98. London: Bloomsbury.
Sanders, Karen, and Maria Jose Canel
2013 “Government Communication in 15 Countries: Themes and Challenges.” In Government Communication: Cases and Challenges, ed. by Karen Sanders, and Maria Jose Canel, 277–312. London: Bloomsbury.
Sanders, Michael L., and Philip M. Taylor
1982British Propaganda During the First World War, 1914–18. London: Macmillan.
Seymour-Ure, Colin
2003Prime Ministers and the Media: Issues of Power and Control. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan
2006 “If They Get It Right: An Experimental Test of the Effects of the Appointment and Reports of UK Public Inquiries.” Public Administration 84 (3): 623–653.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1992 “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87–118.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2006 “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17 (3): 359–383.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 113–139.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Zoonen, Liesbet, and Dominic Wring
2012 “Trends in Political Television Fiction in the UK: Themes, Characters and Narratives, 1965–2009.” Media, Culture & Society 34 (3): 263–279.
Weber, Max
1958The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Scribner.
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder
2002Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wodak, Ruth
2011The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth
2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Eva Vetter
1999 “The Small Distinctions Between Diplomats, Politicians and Journalists: The Discursive Construction of Professional Identity.” In Challenges in a Changing World, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Christoph Ludwig, 209–237. Wien: Passagen.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolph de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Chen, Ningyang
2022. Discursive construction in multilingual crisis risk communication: An analysis of ‘A letter to foreign nationals’ messages in China’s COVID-19 fight. Discourse Studies 24:4 ► pp. 404 ff.
2018. The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games. Policy Sciences 51:4 ► pp. 545 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Defensive semiotic strategies in government: a multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics 28:4 ► pp. 472 ff.
Hansson, Sten
2018. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering. Critical Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 228 ff.
Hansson, Sten, Mari-Liis Madisson & Andreas Ventsel
2023. Discourses of blame in strategic narratives: the case of Russia’s 5G stories. European Security 32:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2022. Corpus-assisted analysis of legitimation strategies in government social media communication. Discourse & Communication 16:5 ► pp. 551 ff.
Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2023. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4 ► pp. 361 ff.
Hu, Qian & Wei Zhong
2023. State‐level politicization of crisis communication on Twitter during COVID‐19: Conceptualization, measurement, and impacts. Public Administration Review 83:5 ► pp. 1266 ff.
Leong, Ching & Michael Howlett
2017. On credit and blame: disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour. Policy Sciences 50:4 ► pp. 599 ff.
Leong, Ching, Michael Howlett & Mehrdad Safaei
2023. Blame avoidance and credit-claiming dynamics in government policy communications: evidence from leadership tweets in four OECD countries during the 2020–2022 COVID-19 pandemic. Policy and Society 42:4 ► pp. 564 ff.
2023. The evasive responses of learners of Chinese as a foreign language in daily interaction: A speech act point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 440 ff.
TRABER, DENISE, MARTIJN SCHOONVELDE & GIJS SCHUMACHER
2020. Errors have been made, others will be blamed: Issue engagement and blame shifting in prime minister speeches during the economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 59:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Ventsel, Andreas, Sten Hansson, Mari-Liis Madisson & Vladimir Sazonov
2021. Discourse of fear in strategic narratives: The case of Russia’s Zapad war games. Media, War & Conflict 14:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.