Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:2 (2017) ► pp.313–333

Uzbek re-modeled

Russian loanwords in post-soviet Uzbek media

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

This study investigates the relationship between Russian language use and language planning in the context of newly independent, post-soviet Uzbekistan (1991–1992). It is guided by the question: In what ways does the use of Russian loanwords in Uzbek language newspapers accomplish language planning in newly independent Uzbekistan? The main finding from this analysis is that post-independence use of Russian loanwords from particular semantic classes in particular contexts reinforce overtly stated ideologies about Russian and construct difference between soviet Uzbekistan and independent Uzbekistan. These findings demonstrate the need to reexamine the role of Russian language in post-soviet contexts, and they contribute a unique approach to analyzing links between lexical items and ideology in language planning.

Keywords: language planning, post-soviet, language ideology, national identity, loanwords, Russian, Uzbek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language planning
    • 2.1Theoretical framework
  • 3.The Uzbek context
  • 4.The current study
    • 4.1Counting and classification
    • 4.2Context
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Results and discussion part I: Language ideologies
    • 5.2Results and discussion part II
      • 5.2.1Decrease in use of Russian loanwords
      • 5.2.2Maintenance of Russian loanwords
      • 5.2.3Restricted use for Russian loanwords
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 21 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15025.cat
References
Akiner, Shirin
1997 “Survey of the Lexical Influence of Russian on Modern Uzbek (1870 1990).” The Slavonic and East European Review, 75(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Androunas, Elena
1993 Soviet Media in Transition: Structural and Economic Alternatives. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Bauman, Richard
1992 “Contextualization, Tradition, and the Dialogue of Genres: Icelandic Legends of the Kraftaskald.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 125–146. New York, NY / Oakleigh, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
1996 “Language Planning as a Discourse on Language and Society: The Linguistic Ideology of a Scholarly Tradition.” Language Problems & Language Planning, 20(3): 199–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeschoten, Hendrik
1998 “Uzbek” In The Turkic Languages, ed. by Lars Johanson, and Éva Csató, 357–378. London / New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Brown, Jeff
1995 “Mass Media in Transition in Central Asia.” International Communication Gazette, 54(3): 249–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh
2000 “Negotiating Ideologies through English: Strategies from the Periphery.” In Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English ed. by Thomas Ricento, 121–132. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak
1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society, 10(2): 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fierman, William
1982 “The Shifting Russian and Uzbek Language Balance in pre-World War II Uzbekistan.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, (38): 125–125.Google Scholar
1989 “Glasnost in Practice: The Uzbek Experience.” Central Asian Survey, 8(2): 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Language Planning and National Development: The Uzbek Experience. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Problems of Language Law Implementation in Uzbekistan. Nationalities Papers, 23(3): 573–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua
2000 “The Status Agenda in Corpus Planning.” In Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in Honor of A. Ronald Walton, ed. by Richard Labert, and Elena Shohamy, 43–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Ethnicity and Supra-ethnicity in Corpus Planning: The Hidden Status Agenda in Corpus Planning.” Nations and Nationalism 10(1–2): 79–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy
1997 “Language Planning from the Bottom Up.” In Indigenous Literacies in the Americas: Language Planning from the Bottom Up, ed. by Nancy Hornberger, 357–366. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith and Susan Gal
2000 “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, & Identities, ed. by Paul V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David
2013 Language Policy. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Robert and Richard Baldauf Jr.
1997 Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Kari-Nyazov, Tashmuxamed
1955 Studies in the History and Culture of Soviet Uzbekistan. [Очерки истории культуры Советского Узбекистана.] Moscow: Nauk and Tashkent University Press.Google Scholar
Khalid, Adeeb
2007 Islam after Communism. Berkeley / Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz
1969 Research Possibilities on Group Bilingualism: A Report. Quebec: International Center for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Kreindler, Isabelle
1997 “Multilingualism in the Successor States of the Soviet Union.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 171: 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Jacob and Barbara Kellner-Heinkele
2001 Politics of Language in the ex-Soviet Muslim States: Azerbayjan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Scott
2007 Turks and Tajiks in Central Asian History. Everyday Life in Central Asia: Past and Present, ed. by Jeff Sahadeo, and Russell Zanca, 13–31. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Marashi, Mehdi
1988 “Phonetic and Semantic Modification of Farsi Loanwords in Contemporary Uzbek.” Islamic Culture 62(2–3), 79–96.Google Scholar
McNair, Brian
1991 Glasnost, Perestroika and the Soviet Media. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Myers‐Scotton, Carol
1992 “Comparing Codeswitching and Borrowing.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13:(1–2), 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta
2008 “Russian in post-Soviet Countries.” Russian Linguistics 32(1): 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
2000 “Language, Ideology and Hindsight: Lessons from Colonial Language Policy.” Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 49–65. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Olivier
2000 The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations. New York: I.B. Tauris Publishers.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold
1998 Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schlyter, Birgit
2012 Language policy and Language Development in Multilingual Uzbekistan. In Language Policy and Language Conflict in Afghanistan and Its Neighbors: The Changing Politics of Language Choice, ed. by H. Schiffman, 176–207. Leiden / Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1993 Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Catedral, Lydia
2021. The (im)possibility of sociolinguistic hybridity: Power and scaling in post‐soviet, transnational life. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25:3 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.