Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 16:3 (2017) ► pp.367–387

No borders

Australians talking beyond the nation

 | The University of Western Australia
Academic debate about the anachronism of national borders is extensive. The general population, however, has been less keen to embrace the idea of a ‘postnational’ world. This paper offers evidence from focus groups with Australians suggesting that in some quarters talking beyond the nation is occurring. However, the ideology of the nation-state remains strong, and such talk is quickly shut down using a particular rhetorical device. This is ‘the principle/practical’ dichotomy, which insists that dropping national borders is impractical for a range of reasons, despite it perhaps being a valuable idea in principle. The paper explores the ways this occurs, using detailed critical discourse analysis. Practical objections are generally framed in terms of governance rather than cultural issues. However, practical examples of existing ‘no borders’ situations are used to make the counter-argument that a postnational world is possible.
Keywords: nation, cosmopolitan, post-national, no borders, nationalism, critical discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Australian orientations beyond the nation
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15026.foz
References (70)
References
Abram, Simone, Bela Feldman Bianco, Shahram Khosravi, N. Salazar, and Nicholas de Genova. 2016. “The free movement of people around the world would be Utopian: IUAES World Congress 2013: Evolving Humanity, Emerging Worlds, 5–10 August 2013.” Identities. 1–33.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget, Nandita Sharma, and Cynthia Wright. 2009. “Editorial: Why No Borders?” Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees (Special Issue on ‘No Borders as a Practical Political Project’) 261: 5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appiah, Kwami. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2009. “Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, and Globalization.” The Journal of Ethics 131: 365–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartram, David. 2010. “International Migration, Open Borders Debates, and Happiness.” International Studies Review 121: 339–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, and Natan Sznaider. 2006. “Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda.” British Journal of Sociology 571: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, Walter. 1998 “A Libertarian Case for Free Immigration.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 131: 167–86.Google Scholar
Brett, Judith, and Anthony Moran. 2011. “Cosmopolitan Nationalism: Ordinary People Making Sense of Diversity.” Nations and Nationalism 171: 188–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 2007. Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph. 1987. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” The Review of Politics 491: 251–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen, and Alistair Davidson. 2000. Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond. 1999. Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration. London: Boulder. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathon Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fozdar, Farida. 2016. “Asian Invisibility/Asian Threat: Australians Talking About Asia” Journal of Sociology 521: 789–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Duelling Discourses, Shared Weapons: Rhetorical Techniques Used to Challenge Racist Arguments.” Discourse and Society 191: 529–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fozdar, Farida, and Mitchell Low. 2015. “‘They Have to Abide by Our Laws…and Stuff’: Ethno Nationalism Masquerading as Civic Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism 211: 524–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fozdar, Farida, and Anne Pedersen. 2013. “Diablogging About Asylum Seekers: Building a Counter-Hegemonic Discourse.” Discourse & Communication 71: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hedetoft, Ulf, and Mette Hjort. 2002. The Postnational Self: Belonging and Identity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, Peter. 2008. “Open Borders and the Right to Immigration.” Human Rights Review 91: 525–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. India: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Inglis, David. 2013. “Cosmopolitanism’s Sociology and Sociology’s Cosmopolitanism: Re-Telling the History of Cosmopolitan Theory from Stoicism to Durkheim and Beyond.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 151: 69–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Keith, and Jeff Malpas. 2011. Ocean to Outback: Cosmopolitanism in Contemporary Australia. Crawley, Western Australia: UWA Publishing.Google Scholar
Jupp, James. 2007. From White Australia to Woomera: The Story of Australian Immigration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Jenny, and Rosaline Barbour. 1999. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Rainer Eising. (eds). 1999. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Richard, and Mary Anne Casey. 2000. Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, Michal. 2008. “Analysing Focus Group Discussions.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michal Krzyzanowski, 162–81. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michele, and Sada Aksartova. 2002. “Ordinary Cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for Bridging Racial Boundaries Among Working-Class Men.” Theory, Culture & Society 191: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jennie. 2006. “Identity in Focus: The Use of Focus Groups to Study the Construction of Collective Identity.” Sociology 401: 89–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1994. “Cosmopolitanism and Patriotism.” Boston Review 191: 3–16.Google Scholar
Pakulski, Jan, and Bruce Tranter. 2000. “Civic, National and Denizen Identity in Australia.” Journal of Sociology 361: 205–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Timothy, and Robert Holton. 2007. “What Do Australians Think About Globalisation? Public and Personal Dimensions.” In Australian Social Attitudes 2: Citizenship, Work and Aspirations, edited by David Denemark, Gabrielle Meagher, Shaun Wilson, Mark Western, and Timothy Phillips, 107–24. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Timothy, and Philip Smith. 2008. “Cosmopolitan Beliefs and Cosmopolitan Practices: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Sociology 441: 391–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “What is ‘Australian’? Knowledge and Attitudes Among a Gallery of Contemporary Australians.” Australian Journal of Political Science 351: 203–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Sharon. 2001. “Common Sense and Original Deviancy: News Discourses and Asylum Seekers in Australia.” Journal of Refugee Studies 141: 169–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puchta, Claudia, and Jonathon Potter. 2004. Focus Group Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Territory Authority Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. Losing Control. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Nina Glick, Linda Basch, and Christina Blanc‐Szanton. (eds). 1992. “Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 6451: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Nina Glick, and Andrew Irving. 2015. Whose Cosmopolitanism? Critical Perspectives, Relationalities and Discontents. New York: Berghan.Google Scholar
Skey, Michael. 2013. “Why Do Nations Matter? The Struggle for Belonging and Security in an Uncertain World.” The British Journal of Sociology 641: 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skrbis, Zlatko, and Ian Woodward. 2007. “The Ambivalence of Ordinary Cosmopolitanism: Investigating the Limits of Cosmopolitan Openness.” The Sociological Review 551: 730–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smithson, Janet. 2000. “Using and analysing focus groups: limitations and possibilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 31: 103–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Geoffrey, Roderic Pitty, and Gary Smith. (eds). 2008. Global Citizens: Australian Activists for Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Dianne. 2013. Knowledge Networks and Transnational Governance: The Public-Private Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Bryan, Christine Halse, and Arathi Sriprakash. 2014. “Cosmopolitanism: Religion and Kinship Among Young People in South-Western Sydney.” Journal of Sociology 501: 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Harry, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra. (eds). 2003. Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1987. Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. California: Sage.Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steve. 2001. “Transnationalism and Identity.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 271: 573–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, Steve, and Robin Cohen. (eds). 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1981. “The Distribution of Membership”. In Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits, edited by Peter Brown, and Henry Shue, 1–35. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman.Google Scholar
Werbner, Pnina. 2008. “Introduction: Towards a New Cosmopolitan Anthropology.” In Anthropology and the New Cosmopolitanism, edited by Pnina Werbner, 1–29. Berg: Oxford.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Global Pathways. Working Class Cosmopolitans and the Creation of Transnational Ethnic Worlds.” Social Anthropology 71: 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 2003. “Racism and the Analysis of Cultural Resources in Interviews.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research, edited by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret, and Jonathon Potter. 1992. Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wise, Amanda, and Selvaraj Velayutham. (eds). 2009. Everyday Multiculturalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is About: A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Martin Reisigl. (eds). 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Ian, Zlatko Skrbis, and Clive Bean. 2008. “Attitudes Towards Globalization and Cosmopolitanism: Cultural Diversity, Personal Consumption and the National Economy.” British Journal of Sociology 591: 207–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Moran, Anthony
2021. Globalisation, postnationalism and Australia. Journal of Sociology 57:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Ashcroft, Bill
2019. Borders, Bordering, and the Transnation. English Academy Review 36:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Fozdar, Farida
2018. Social Transformation and the Individual: Opportunities and Limitations. Journal of Intercultural Studies 39:2 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Fozdar, Farida
2018. Buying the Nation and Beyond: Discursive Dilemmas in Debates around Cosmopolitan Consumption. In Cosmopolitanism, Markets, and Consumption, ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Fozdar, Farida
2021. Re-imagining the world: Australians’ engagement with postnationalism, or Why the nation is the problem. Journal of Sociology 57:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.