Talking security and rights
The framing of counter-terrorism legislation in the UK
This article addresses the question of how draconian counter-terrorism policies are legitimized in long-established democracies. Being the heartland of liberal rights, the UK comes to the fore as a striking case where some of the most controversial security policies have been enacted. The study undertakes a systematic frame analysis of UK parliamentary debates with the help of ATLAS.ti, which allows the analyst to trace and map out recurrent concepts, themes, and arguments as well as their overall distribution. While demonstrating the workings of securitization in the formulation of key counter-terrorism legislation, the study unearths how the security narrative in the UK context evidently relies on the language of rights in invoking legitimacy. The study suggests that far from negating the indispensable status of human rights, security narrative resorts to the latter’s moral power and mimics rights language, heralding the weight of these international norms even in hard-core security matters.
Article outline
- 1.Rights, security, and the analysis of frames
- 2.Framing counter-terrorsim in the Parliament
- a.Framing the problem
- b.Framing of the solution
- 3.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (28)
Agamben, Giorgio
2003 State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Balzacq, Thierry
2010 “
A theory of securitization: Origins, Core assumptions and variants.” In
Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by
Thierry Balzacq. Routledge: New York.
Brown, Anne M.
2002 Human Rights and the Borders of Suffering: The Promotion of Human Rights in International Politics. New York: Manchester University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde
1998 Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Counter-Terrorism and Security Act
2015 Accessed 10 June 2015. Available at
[URL].
Slack, James
2016 “
EU may ban deporting terrorism suspects: Top Brussels court plans power grab on human rights cases,”
Daily Mail 11 May. Accessed 10 July 2016.
[URL].
Donnelly, Jack
1999 “
The Social Construction of International Human Rights.” in
Dunne, T. and
Wheeler, N.J. (eds.)
Human Rights in Global Politics, 71–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunne, Tim
2010 “
The English School,” in
International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by
Tim Dunne,
Milja Kurki, and
Steve Smith, 132–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, Kathryn Marie
2015 Security, Identity, and British Counterterrorism Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forsythe, David P.
2000 Human Rights in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, Erving
1986 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Goold, Benjamin J. and Lazarus, Liora
2007 Security and Human Rights. Portland: Hart Publishing.
HM Government
2011 Review of Counter-terrorism and Security Powers. Accessed 10 February 2013.
[URL].
House of Lords
16 December 2004 Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for the Judgment in the Cause A (FC) and others (FC) (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) X (FC) and another (FC) (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent). Accessed 05 October 2013.
[URL].
Human Rights Act 1998 (Designated Derogation) Order
2001 Accessed 10 February 2014.
[URL].
Huysman, Jef and Buonfino, Alessandra
2008 “
Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Terrorism, and Asylum in the Parliamentary Debates in the UK.” In
Political Studies, 56 (4): 766–788.
Jackson, Richard
2005 Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kuypers, Jim A.
2009 “
Framing Analysis.” In
Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action, (ed.)
Jim A. Kuypers, 181–204. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
Neal, Andrew W.
2012 “
Normalization and Legislative Exceptionalism: Counterterrorist Lawmaking and the Changing Times of Security Emergencies.” In
International Political Sociology, vol. 61: 260–276.
Parker, Tom
2006 “
The Fateful Triangle: Identity Politics, Security Policy and the Anglo-Irish Relations.” In
National Counter-terrorism Strategies, edited by
R. W. Orttung and
A. Makarychev, 79–105. Netherlands: IOS Press.
Risse, Thomas, Ropp Stephen C., and Sikkink Kathryn
1999 The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Savic, Obrad
1999 “
Introduction: The Global and the Local in Human Rights.” In
The Politics of Human Rights, edited by
Obrad Savic, 3–15. London: Verso.
Travis, Alan
2013 “
Conservatives promise to scrap Human Rights Act after next election.”
The Guardian 30 September. Accessed 20 April 2014.
[URL].
Tsoukala, Anastassia
2008 “
Defining the terrorist threat in the post-September 11 era.” In
Terror, Insecurity, and Liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regime after 9/11, edited by
Bigo, Didier and
Tsoukala, Anastassia, 50–99. Routledge: New York.
Verloo, Mieke and Lombardo, Emanuela
2007 “
Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” In
Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, edited by
Mieke Verloo, 21–50. Budapest: CEU Press.
Wæver, Ole
1995 “
Securitization and Desecuritization.” In
On Security, edited by
R. Lipschutz, pp. 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wolfendale, Jessica
2006 “
Terrorism, Security and the Threat of Counterterrorism.”
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29 (7): 753–770.
Zarakol, Ayşe
2011 “
What Makes Terrorism Modern? Terrorism, Legitimacy, and the International System.”
Review of International Studies, 37 (5): 2311–2336.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Lähteenmäki, Liisa & Anne Alvesalo
Lock, Irina, Charlotte Stachel & Peter Seele
2020.
Traveling frames: How corporate and civil society actors try to influence public administration and courts in a case on nuclear emission data in Switzerland.
Journal of Public Affairs 20:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.