Cover not available
Article published In:
The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 1–18

The micro-politics of sequential organization

Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology

 | University of Basel
 | University of Basel
Conversation analysis (CA) and ethnomethodology (EM) have long dealt with political talk, but this is the first thematic volume showing the continuity and diversity of EMCA studies in this field. This introduction provides an overview of early to recent EMCA contributions to the study of political talk and discusses how they developed a distinctive field of investigation and how the papers of the special issue draw on and contribute to it. The introduction also clarifies how specific sequential and categorial organizations of social interaction manifest and foster political action and participation, and are locally treated as of political importance by the participants themselves. The study of micro-politics of sequentiality focuses on the temporal, emergent, and sequential unfolding of interaction and the way its organization opens/closes possible occasions for politically relevant actions. By showing how these are established, responded and oriented to by the participants, it offers a respecification of political issues.
Keywords: conversation analysis, political interactions, institutional talk, sequentiality, categorization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The contributions of EMCA to the study of political talk
    • 2.1Political speeches and their reception by co-present audience
    • 2.2Question/Answer sequences in news interviews
    • 2.3Historical trends of Q&A formats in presidential press conferences
    • 2.4Sequential and categorical organization of broadcasted political discussions in radio phone-ins and television debates
    • 2.5Grassroots political activities and citizen participation in political encounters
  • 3.Conclusion: the special issue’s contributions to the micro-politics of sequentiality
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee
References (75)
References
Atkinson, John M. 1984a. “Public Speaking and Audience Responses: Some Techniques for Inviting Applause.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 370–409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1984b. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1985. “Refusing Invited Applause: Preliminary Observations from a Case Study of Charismatic Oratory.” Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 161–181. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barthélémy, Michel. 1992. “Événement et espace public: L’affaire Carpentras [Event and public space: the Carpentras case].” Quaderni 18 (1): 125–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, Adrian. 2005. Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bovet, Alain. 2006. “La constitution du public dans la démocratie semi-directe. Le cas de l’initiative populaire ‘pour une procréation respectant la dignité humaine’ [The constitution of the public in a semi-direct democracy. The case of the popular initiative ‘for a procreation respecting human dignity].” Mots 811: 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Analyse des pratiques médiatiques de mise en forme et de mise en oeuvre du débat public [Analysis of media practices formatting and achieving public debate]. PhD doctoral thesis, Faculté des Sciences économiques et sociales de l’Université de Fribourg, Université de Fribourg.Google Scholar
Bovet, Alain, and Marc Relieu. 2014. “Assembling the Collective Experience of a Serious Game Mediation as an Interactional Practice.” Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8512: 571–580.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1988. “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35 (4): 474–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. “The Production of Punctuality: Social Interaction, Temporal Organization, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (3): 659–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. “News Interview Openings: Aspects of Sequential Organization.” In Broadcast Talk: A Reader, ed. by Paddy Sannell, 48–75. London: Sage.Google Scholar
1993. “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review 58 (1): 110–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media Culture & Society 24 (2): 191–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “Questioning in Broadcast Journalism.” In ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed and Susan Ehrlich. 256–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012. “Conversation Analysis in the News Interview.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 630–656. West-Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Megan Beckett. 2010. “A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential News.” Political Communication 27 (3): 229–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie McDonald. 2006. “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (4): 561–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., John Heritage, Marc N. Elliott, and Laurie McDonald. 2007. “When Does the Watchdog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 72 (1): 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and Matthew P. Fox. this issue. “Hardballs and Softballs: Modulating Adversarialness in Journalistic Questioning.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 20–40.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002a. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication 521:749–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage (eds). 1992. Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dupret, Baudouin, Jiri Nekvapil, and Ivan Leudar (eds). 2007. Media, Wars and Identities – Part One. Vol. 91, Ethnographic Studies.Google Scholar
Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester. 1999. ““You’re All a Bunch of Feminists”: Categorization and the Politics of Terror in the Montreal Massacre.” Human Studies 221: 253–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Marianna Patrona (eds). 2011. Talking Politics in Broadcast Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2000. New Labour. New Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley. 2002. “Identity, Categorization and Sequential Organization: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse & Society 13 (5):679–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2009. Media, Policy and Interaction. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Introduction to Membership Categorisation Analysis.” In Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley, 1–21. Los Angeles: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, and Joanna Thornborrow. this issue. “‘I’m a Scouser’: Membership Categories and Political Geography in the 2015 UK Election Call Phone-in.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 41–59.
Geden, Oliver. 2007. Diskursstrategien im Rechtspopulismus [Discursive strategies of right wing populism]. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David. 1986. “Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by Interviewees.” Media Culture & Society 8 (4): 441–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17 (3): 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 95–117. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1427–1446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch. 1986. “Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 110–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews.” In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Deirdri Boden and Don H. Zimmerman. 93–173. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, Adam, and Chad Nilep. 2007. Discourse, War and Terrorism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Keel, Sara. this issue. “The Interactive Achievement and Transformation of a “Revolutionary Category” – Sans-Papiers – During Public Press Conferences.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 60–84.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick. 2005. “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology 39 (4): 697–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick, and Carly W. Butler. 2011. “Walking Out on Air.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (1): 44–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996a. “Popular Public Discourse at Speakers’ Corner: Negotiating Cultural Identities in Interaction.” Discourse & Society 7 (1): 7–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996b. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 251: 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. this issue. “Mobilising the Micro-Political Voice: Doing the ‘Human Microphone’ and the ‘Mic-Check’.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 112–138.
Mole, Richard C.M. (ed). 2007. Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2005. “BEcomING COLLECTIVE: The constitution of the audience as an interactional process.” In Makings Things Public. Athmospheres of Democracy, ed. by Bruno Latour, and Peter Weibel, 876–883. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics 21 (2): 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The facilitator’s task of formulating citizens’ proposals in political meetings: Orchestrating multiple embodied orientations to recipients. 161: 1–62. [URL]
. 2017. “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” In Language Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig, Peter Mühlhäusler and Steve Pagel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, Hanna Svensson, and Nynke Van Schepen. this issue. “A Table-Based Turn-Taking System and its Political Consequences: Managing Participation, Building Opinion Groups, and Fostering Consensus.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (1): 85–112.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rojo, Luisa M. 2014. “The Spatial Dynamics of Discourse in Global Protest Movements.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (4): 583–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell H. Hymes. 325–345. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Vol. I + II1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. “Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Munch, and Neil J. Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1988/1989. “From Interview to Confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather Encounter.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 221: 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in which Numbers Are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Studies in Social Organisation and Embodied Activities ed. by Paul ten Have and George Psathas, 31–42. Washington D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Discourse & Power. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Patrick, and Christian Greiffenhagen. 2009. “Press Scrums: Some Preliminary Observations.” In Media, Policy and Interaction, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley, 115–135. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod. 1997. “Some General Reflections on Categorization and Sequence in the Analysis of Conversation.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin, 49–76. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 2015. “De-Refying Categories.” In Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, ed. by Richard Fitzgerald and William Housley, 23–49. Los Angeles: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Jean. 2010. Discours et cognition sociale [Discourse and social cognition]. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. Van Dijk (eds). 2000. Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Robles, Jessica S. & Bingjuan Xiong
2024. How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo
Kim, Kyoungmi & Jo Angouri
2023. “It’s hard for them to even understand what we are saying”(.) Language and power in the multinational workplace. critical perspectives on international business 19:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Xiong, Bingjuan & Jessica S. Robles
2023. Functions of quotation in online political comments. Discourse, Context & Media 55 ► pp. 100717 ff. DOI logo
Minerva, Eleonora Maddalena, Adele Tessitore, Stefano Cafarotti & Miriam Patella
2022. Urban–Rural Disparities in the Lung Cancer Surgical Treatment Pathway: The Paradox of a Rich, Small Region. Frontiers in Surgery 9 DOI logo
Rautajoki, Hanna & Richard Fitzgerald
2022. Populating ‘solidarity’ in political debate. Journal of Language and Politics 21:5 ► pp. 763 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.