Article published In:
The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodologyEdited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 19–39
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 19–39
Hardballs and softballs
Modulating adversarialness in journalistic questioning
The design of questions in news interviews and news conferences has proven to be an illuminating window into the tenor of press-state relations. Quantitative studies have charted aggregate variations in adversarial questioning, but less is known about variations in the intensity of adversarialness within any particular question. Such variation is captured by the vernacular distinction between “hardball” versus “softball” questions. Hardballs advance an oppositional viewpoint vigorously, while softballs do so at most mildly. In this paper we investigate recurrent language practices through which journalists modulate the oppositionality of a question, thereby either hindering or facilitating response. The objective is to better understand how adversarialness is enacted in direct encounters between politicians and journalists.
Keywords: Questions, news interviews, news conferences, journalism, journalistic norms, objectivity, adversarialness, adversarial journalism, press-state relations
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Adversarial Viewpoints: Articulated Versus Advocated
- 3.Elaborating factualistic Grounds
- 4.From factualistic grounds to adversarial conclusion
- 5.Soliciting response: Hardening/softening by inviting affirmation/rejection
- 6.Soliciting response: Hardening/softening by implicating the difficulty/ease of response
- 7.Vernacular characterizations revisited: The subversiveness of a “simple question”
- 8.Discussion
-
References
References (33)
References
Bolden, Galina, Jenny Mandelbaum, and Sue Wilkinson
2012 “Pursuing a Response By Repairing an Indexical Reference.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(2): 137–155. 
Clayman, Steven E.
1988 “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35(4): 474–492.
1992 “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2002 “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media, Culture, and Society 241: 191–210.
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2002a The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures On the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2002b “Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of U.S. Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan.” Journal of Communication 52(4): 749–775.
Clayman, Steven E., Marc N. Elliott, John Heritage, and Laurie McDonald
2006 “Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents 1953–2000.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 361: 561–583.
Clayman, Steven E., John Heritage, Marc N. Elliott, and Laurie McDonald
2007 “When Does the Watchdog Bark?: Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences.” American Sociological Review 721: 23–41.
Clayman, Steven E., Marc Elliott, John Heritage, and Megan Beckett
2010 “A Watershed in White House Journalism: Explaining the Post-1968 Rise of Aggressive Presidential News.” Political Communication 271: 229–247.
Conza, Angiola Di, Augusto Gnisci, and Angelo Caputo
2011 “Interviewers Use of Coercive Questioning During a Midterm Period Favorable to the Opposition Party.” In Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces, ed. by A. Esposito, 147–154. Berlin: Springer.
Ekström Mats
2011 “Hybridity as a Resource and Challenge in a Talk Show Political Interview.” In Talking Politics in Broadcast Media, ed. by Mats Ekström, and Marianna Patrona, 135–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ekström, Mats, Göran Eriksson, Bengt Johansson, and Patrik Wikström
2012 “Biased Interrogations? A Multi-Methodological Approach on Bias in Election Campaign Interviews.” Journalism Studies 14(3): 423–439.
Eriksson, Göran
2011a “Adversarial Moments: A Study of Short-Form Interviews in the News.” Journalism 12(1): 51–69.
2011b “Follow-Up Questions in Political Press Conferences.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3331–3344.
Eriksson, Göran, and Johan Östman
2013 “Cooperative or Adversarial? Journalists’ Enactment of the Watchdog Function in Political News Production.” International Journal of Press/Politics 18(3): 304–324.
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
2002 “Constituency and Turn Increments.” In The Language of Turns and Sequences, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. London: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, John
2002 “Ad Hoc Inquiries: Two Preferences in the Design of Routine Questions in an Open Context.” In Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, ed. by Douglas W. Maynard, Hanneke Houtkoop, Nora C. Schaeffer, and Johannes van der Zouwen, 313–334. New York: Wiley.
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 30–52.
Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson, Marc Elliott, Megan Beckett, and Michael Wilkes
2007 “Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: The Difference one Word Can Make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(10): 1429–1433.
Heritage, John and Andrew Roth
1995 “Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(1): 1–60.
Huls, Erica and Jasper Varwijk
2011 “Political Bias in TV Interviews.” Discourse and Society 22(1): 48–65.
Hutchby, Ian
2011 “Non-Neutrality and Argument in the Hybrid Political Interview,” Discourse Studies 13(3): 349–367.
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kampf, Zahar, and Efrat Daskal
2011 “When the Watchdog Bites: Insulting Politicians On Air.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Mats Ekström and Marianna Patrona, 177–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krippendorff, Klaus
1980 Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.
Montgomery, Martin
2007 The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007 “Neutralism and Adversarial Challenges in the Political News Interview.” Discourse and Communication 1(4): 387–406.
Romaniuk, Tanya
2013a “Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn, and Elizabeth Holt, 201–220. London, England: Bloomsbury Press.
2013b “Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2): 144–164.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schudson, Michael
2008 Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity.
Tolson, Andrew
2012 “You’ll Need a Miracle to Win this Election.” (J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer Assertiveness in UK General Elections 1983–2010.” Discourse, Context, and Media 11: 45–53.
Walker, Gareth
2004 “On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 147–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (15)
Cited by 15 other publications
Beck Nielsen, Søren
2024. Contradicting potential climate misinformation during televised debates. Pragmatics and Society 
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2024. Using formulations to maximize differences of opinion during televised climate change panel interviews. Journalism
Len-Ríos, María E., Rico Neumann & Solyee Kim
2024. Challenging Politicians on Race in Interviews: Social Dominance Orientation, Perceived Journalistic Credibility, Bias, and Appropriateness. Journalism Practice 18:2 ► pp. 413 ff.
Patrona, Marianna
2024. ‘Softballs’ for ‘Hardballs’: The congenial political interview on right-wing partisan TV news outlets. Journalism
Hepburn, Alexa, Jonathan Potter & Marissa Caldwell
2023. The Visible Politics of Intersubjectivity: Constructing Knowledge as Shared to Manage Resistance in News Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:5-6 ► pp. 544 ff.
Wan, Helen
2023. “Hypophora” and “question cascade” in Cantonese political discourse: the stance triangle and the use of rhetorical moves and utterance final particles. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 647 ff.
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2022. Assessments and actions: Instances from Arabic broadcast political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 211 ff.
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2023. ‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews. Discourse, Context & Media 56 ► pp. 100743 ff.
Feng, Debing
2022. Achieving discourse truth in doing affiliated news interviews. Journalism 23:11 ► pp. 2400 ff.
Heritage, John
2022. The Multiple Accountabilities of Action. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 297 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E, Øyvind Ihlen, Sine N Just & and Anders Olof Larsson
2022. Expert ethos and the strength of networks: negotiations of credibility in mediated debate on COVID-19. Health Promotion International 37:2
Hernández, Alfonso
2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Hernández, Alfonso
Clementson, David E
2019. Why Won’t You Answer the Question? Mass-Mediated Deception Detection After Journalists’ Accusations of Politicians’ Evasion. Journal of Communication 69:6 ► pp. 674 ff.
Elsey, Christopher
2019. Mental health disclosure in the public eye: accounting for and managing absences from professional sporting competition. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11:4 ► pp. 435 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.