Cover not available
Article published In:
The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 40–58

‘I’m a Scouser’

Membership categories and political geography in the 2015 UK Election Call Phone-in

 | University of Macao, China
 | University of Western Brittany, France
Despite the emergence of newer forms of web-based political engagement, radio phone-ins continue to have a significant role in the enactment of the democratic process, providing a live forum for direct encounters between members of the public and politicians, beyond the professional forms of mediated encounters between studio journalists and politicians. In this paper, drawing on data from the BBC’s 2015 phone-in Election Call, we use Membership Categorisation Analysis to examine the ways in which political engagement is configured within this forum in the run up to the UK General Election in 2015. In particular, we examine how callers and politicians engage in live political debate through transforming personal experiences into politicised social categories. What emerges most significantly here is that, whereas in previous Election Call series participants configured political categories through personal social identities, in 2015 there is a particular emphasis on callers’ geographical locations as political categories.
Keywords: discourse analysis, conversation analysis, membership categorisation analysis, political engagement, public opinion, radio phone-in
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The radio phone-in as a site of political and social engagement
    • The radio phone-in as a site for analyzing political engagement
  • 2.Methodology and data
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Shifting forms of engagement, access and action
    • 3.2Caller location as a participatory relevant category
    • 3.3Configuring category membership through political geography
  • 4.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.03fit
References (32)
References
Coleman, Stephen. 2002. “Election Call 2001: How Politicians and the Public Interacted.” Parliamentary Affairs 551: 731–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2012a. “‘With Whom do I have the Pleasure?’: Callers’ Categories in Political Talk Radio Programs.” Journal of Pragmatics, 44(3): 280–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. “Types of Interaction on Israeli Political Radio Phone-in Programmes and their Relations to the Public Sphere.” Javnost-The Public 19(3): 21–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Ulla Moberg. 2015. “‘Welcome to Participate!’: Host Activities and Caller’s Position in Swedish Election Campaign Phone-ins in the 1970s and the 2000s.” Journalism 16(5): 654–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard. 2007. “An Initial Investigation into the Role of Talkback in Hong Kong and Singapore.” Media International Australia 1241: 87–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley. 2002. “Identity, Categorisation and Sequential Organisation: The Sequential and Categorial Flow of Identity in a Radio Phone-in.” Discourse and Society 13(5): 579–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Talkback Community and the Public Sphere.” Media International Australia 1221: 150–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (eds). 2015. Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA..Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin (eds). 1997. Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Boston, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hofstetter, Richard C.. 1998. “Political Talk Radio, Situational Involvement, and Political Mobilization.” Social Science Quarterly 79(2): 273–86.Google Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2002. “A Reconsidered Model of Membership Categorisation Analysis.” Qualitative Research 2(1): 59–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2001. ‘“Witnessing’: The Use of First-Hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio.” Discourse Studies 3 (4): 481–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2008. “‘This Poll has not Happened Yet’: Temporal Play in Election Predictions.” Discourse & Communication, 2 (1): 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner. 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilby, Laura, and Ava. D. Horowitz. 2013. “Opening up Terrorism Talk: The Sequential and Categorical Production of Discursive Power within the Call Openings of a Talk Radio Broadcast.” Discourse & Society 24 (6): 725–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Francis L. F. 2007. “Talk Radio Listening, Opinion Expression and Political Discussion in a Democratizing Society.” Asian Journal of Communication 17(1): 78–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 2013. “Media Studies’ Fascination with the Concept of the Public Sphere: Critical Reflections and Emerging Debates.” Media, Culture and Society 35(1): 87–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNair, Brian, Mathew Hibberd, and Philip Schlesinger. 2002. “Public Access Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics.” Journalism Studies 3 (3): 407–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Karen. 2004. “Political Talk Radio and Democratic Participation: Caller Perspectives on Election Call.” Media, Culture and Society 26 (6): 785–801. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “On the Analysability of Stories by Children”. In Ethnomethodology, ed. by Roy Turner, 216–32. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1995. Lectures on Conversation Vol. I and II1, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stremlau, Nicole, Emanuele Fantini and Iginio Gagliardone. 2015. “Patronage, Politics and Performance: Radio Call-in Programs and the Myth of Accountability.” Third World Quarterly 36 (8): 1510–1526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. “Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 277–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2001. “Authenticating Talk: Building Public Identities in Audience Participation Broadcasting.” Discourse Studies 3 (4): 459–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
. 2015. The Discourse of Public Participation Media. From Talk Show to Twitter. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2002. “From Problematic Object to Routine ‘Add-On’: Dealing with E-mails in Radio Phone-ins.” Discourse Studies 4 (2): 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “‘Grab a Pen and Paper’: Interaction v. Interactivity in a Political Radio Phone-in.” Journal of Language and Politics 12 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Graeme. 2009. “Politics, Radio and Journalism in Australia The Influence of ‘Talkback’;.” Journalism 10 (4): 411–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Joyce, Jack B. & Linda Walz
2022. Picking fights with politicians. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 562 ff. DOI logo
Mohd Nor, Siti Nurbaya
2021. Constructing ethnic and national identities in talk on Malaysian issues. Discourse & Society 32:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.