References

References

Amerine, Ronald, and Jack Bilmes
1988 “Following Instructions.” Human Studies 11: 327–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, John M.
1984Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
2002Ethnomethodology’s Program. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1971Relations in Public. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman
2010Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities and Institutions. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner. 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 110 ]
Llewellyn, Nick
2005 “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology 39: 697–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul
1996 “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 25: 27–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2005 “BEcomING COLLECTIVE: The Constitution of the Audience as an Interactional Process.” In Makings Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, ed. by Bruno Latour, and Peter Weibel, 876–883. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Embodied and Spatial Resources for Turn-Taking in Institutional Multi-Party Interactions: Participatory Democracy Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Facilitator’s Task of Formulating Citizens’ Proposals in Political Meetings: Orchestrating Multiple Embodied Orientations to Recipients.” 16: 1–62. www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.de
Sacks, Harvey
1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Materials for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in Which Numbers are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Situated Order, ed. by Paul ten Have, and George Psathas, 31–42. Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Chen, Qi & Adam Brandt
2021. Speakership, recipiency and the interactional space: Cases of “Next-speaker self-selects” in multiparty university student meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 180  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Heath, Christian & Lorenza Mondada
2019. Transparency and Embodied Action: Turn Organization and Fairness in Complex Institutional Environments. Social Psychology Quarterly 82:3  pp. 274 ff. Crossref logo
Hofstetter, Emily
2021. Achieving Preallocation: Turn Transition Practices in Board Games. Discourse Processes 58:2  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Hofstetter, Emily & Leelo Keevallik
2020.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Le défi de la multimodalité en interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée XXII:2  pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.