Cover not available
Article published In:
The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology
Edited by Lorenza Mondada and Sara Keel
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:1] 2017
► pp. 110–136

Mobilising the micro-political voice

Doing the ‘Human Microphone’ and the ‘mic-check’

 | Aalborg University
A notable feature of the participatory communication repertoire developed by the Occupy movement is known as the “Human Microphone” or “People’s Mic”, reminiscent of the call-and-response format of action. A collection was made of more than 160 online amateur videos recorded at an Occupy protest site or event in which the Human Mic and the disaffiliative “mic check” were used in diverse ways. In 19 separate cases, more than one video recording was independently uploaded of the same event, thus giving a unique insight into the constitution of participation in a collective (and yet potentially dissensual) politico-interactional space from disparate technology-mediated spatial positions at the site. Ethnomethodological conversation analysis (EMCA) is used to analyse the social interactional accomplishment and collective organisation of the ‘voice’ of the Human Mic, including its propagation to larger audiences and its interdiscursive translation into new settings as a strategic tool of political communication that attempts to ‘occupy’ institutional speech.
Keywords: Social movement, Conversation analysis, Online video archive, Human microphone, Disaffiliation, Micro-politics, Voice, Audience
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Occupy and the ‘Human Microphone’
  • 3.Data collection
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Doing the Human Mic
    • 4.2HM relays and the ‘mic-check’
    • 4.3Doing the disaffiliative ‘mic-check’
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.06mci
References (16)
References
Atkinson, John M.. 1984. Our Master’s Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1993. “Booing: The Anatomy of a Disaffiliative Response.” American Sociological Review 581: 110–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1996. “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 71–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Nikki, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “‘The Camera Rolls’: Using Third-Party Video in Field Research.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 642 (1): 109–123. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Laurier, Eric. 2015. “YouTube: Fragments of a Video-Tropic Atlas.” Area 48(8): 488–495. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick. 2005. “Audience Participation in Political Discourse: A Study of Public Meetings.” Sociology 39 (4): 697–716. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lomax, Helen, and Neil Casey. 1998. “Recording Social Life: Reflexivity and Video Methodology.” Sociological Research Online 3 (2). [URL] [Date accessed: 17 May 2010]. DOI logo
Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2011. “Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement.” Social Movement Studies 10 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Public Discourse.” Language in Society 251: 27–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nardone, Michael. 2012. Repetition and Difference: On the Human Microphone as Interventionist Form. Available online: [URL] [Date accessed: 25 April 2015].
Reynolds, Edward J. 2013. Enticing a Challengeable: Instituting Social Order as a Practice of Public Conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Journalism and Communication: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Rebecca L. 2014. “The Occupy Assembly: Discursive Experiments in Direct Democracy.” Journal of Language and Politics 13 (4): 702–731. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

McIlvenny, Paul
2017. Refusing What We Are: Communicating Counter-Identities and Prefiguring Social Change in Social Movements. In Identity Revisited and Reimagined, ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.