This article studies one of the key-metaphors that has dominated British EU-debates for the past 25 years, i.e. the slogan, Britain at the heart of Europe. The discourse career of this metaphor up to the Brexit referendum shows a decline in its affirmative, optimistic use, and a converse increase of deriding uses to the point of declaring the heart of Europe irredeemably diseased, dead, non-existent or rotten. We argue that these changes in the metaphor scenario of the heart of Europe concept helped to entice the British public to integrate the information supplied by pro-Brexit campaigners into a narrative of a dying EU, which motivated their voting preferences. Even statements that were exposed as factually wrong or implausible before the Brexit referendum were still accepted as fitting the narrative and thus considered as more reliable than unframed pieces of counter-information supplied by the Brexit critics.
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2016. “The Vocal Euro-outsider: The UK in a Twospeed Europe.” The Political Quarterly, 87(2):238–246.
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès. 2015a. “Euroscepticism under Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron: From Theory to Practice.” Observatoire de la société britannique, La Garde: UFR Lettres et sciences humaines, Université du Sud Toulon Var, 171:115–133. [URL].
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès. 2015b. “Reassessing British Conservative Euroscepticism as A Case of Party (Mis)Management.” In The UK Challenge to Europeanization. The Persistence of British Euroscepticism, ed. by Karine Tournier-Sol; Christopher Gifford, 99–116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bowdle, Brian F., and Dedre Gentner. 2005. “The career of metaphor.” Psychological Review, 112 (1):193–216.
Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase & Fable. 1999. Ed. by Adrian Room. London: Cassell.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CDU/CSU-Fraktion des Deutschen Bundestags. 1994. Überlegungen zur europäischen Politik. Bonn: CDU.
Connolly, Bernard. 1995. The Rotten Heart of Europe. London: Faber.
Daddow, Oliver. 2013. “Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Eurosceptic Tradition in Britain.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 151:210–227.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fillmore Charles J.. 1975. “An alternative to checklist theories of Meaning.” Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 11:123–131.
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press, London: Routledge.
Gifford, Chris. 2014. The making of Eurosceptic Britain. London: Routledge.
Hansard. 1991. House of Commons Debate on the European Council in Maastricht 11 December 1991 (Hansard vol. 200, cc. 859–78). Accessed January 22, 2015. [URL].
Jackson, Daniel, Einar Thorsen, and Dominic Wring (eds.). 2016. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading UK academics. Bournemouth: Bournemouth University, The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2012. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2009. “Metaphor, Culture, and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff and Jörg Zinken, 11–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kremer, Thomas. 2004. The Missing Heart of Europe: Does Britain hold the key to the future of the Continent? London: The June Press.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
Lynch, Philip, and Richard Whitaker. 2013. “Rivalry on the right: The Conservatives, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and the EU issue.” British Politics, 8(3):285–312.
Major, John. 2000. The Autobiography. London: HarperCollins.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004a. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004b. “The Heart of the European Body Politic. British and German Perspectives on Europe’s Central Organ.” Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 25 (5 & 6):437–452.
Musolff, Andreas. 2006. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1): 23–38.
Musolff, Andreas. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the body politic. London: Routledge.
Musolff, Andreas. 2014. “Metaphor in the Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 45–66. London: Bloomsbury.
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
Niemeier, Susanne. 2000. “Straight from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations.” In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective, ed. by Antonio Barcelona, 195–213. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Reeves, Nigel. 1996. “‘Den festen Kern weiter festigen’: Towards a Functional Taxonomy of Transnational Political Discourse.” In Conceiving of Europe – Unity in Diversity, ed. by Andreas Musolff, Christina Schäffner, and Michael Townson, 161–169. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishers.
Roget’s International Thesaurus. 1996. Ed. by Robert Chapman. London: HarperCollins.
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. 2002. Ed. by William R. Trumble, and Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Whitman, Richard G.. 2016. “Brexit of Bremain? What future for the UK’s European diplomatic strategy?” International Affairs 92(3):509–529.
Wodak, Ruth. 2009a. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis: Introducing Qualitative Methods, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2009b. “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Introducing Qualitative Methods, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2016. We have the character of an island nation. A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg Speech” on the European Union. EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2016/36. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
2024. Polling to vaccination stations: Brexit’s influence on immunisation uptake. New Perspectives 32:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Landmann, Julia & Yannick Ganz
2024. Recent metaphors of Brexit in the British press. English Today 40:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Huang, Evelyn Y. H. & Benson Tsz Kin Leung
2023. Risk attitude and belief updating: theory and experiment. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Inya, Onwu
2023. ‘This app is evil forest true true’: metaphor-based metadiscursive evaluations of Twitter by Nigerians. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38:4 ► pp. 1582 ff.
Martín de la Rosa, Victoria
2023. Taking back control: The role of image schemas in the Brexit discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 276 ff.
Sun, Ya, Deyi Kong & Chenmeng Zhou
2023. Economy or ecology: metaphor use over time in China’s Government Work Reports. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 551 ff.
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. Do we need Queer Cognitive Linguistics?. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :16 (2022) ► pp. 241 ff.
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2022. A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24:4 ► pp. 27 ff.
2022. Pull the weeds out or perish: Using pandemic metaphors to strengthen in-group solidarity in Turkish political discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 37:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
2022. Foundational Moments, Representative Claims and the Ecology of Social Ignorance. Political Studies 70:4 ► pp. 962 ff.
Sharapkova, Anastasia
2022. Mediating and Transforming Knowledge in Daily Intercultural Communication: A Case of Arthurian Myth in Politics. In Specialized Knowledge Mediation, ► pp. 173 ff.
Sommella, Silvia
2022. The Fairy Tale Mental Model in Speeches by the Austrian FPÖ and the Italian Lega Right-Wing Populist Parties in the European Parliament: A Contrastive Linguistic Analysis. In On the Discursive Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Europe [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 151 ff.
2021. Researching political metaphor cross-culturally: English, Hungarian, Greek and Turkish L1-based interpretations of the Nation as Body metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics 183 ► pp. 121 ff.
Zeng, Winnie Huiheng, Christian Burgers & Kathleen Ahrens
2021. Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free Economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997–2017). Lingua 252 ► pp. 102955 ff.
Apresyan, Кarine H.
2020. POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONNOTATION OF METAPHORS IN POLITICAL DISCOURE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University :4
Beaton-Thome, Morven
2020. Flagging the Homeland: Interpreting Brexit à la Nigel Farage in the European Union. In Multilingualism and Politics, ► pp. 105 ff.
Burgers, Christian & Ahrens, Kathleen
2020. Change in Metaphorical Framing: Metaphors of TRade in 225 Years of State of the Union Addresses (1790–2014). Applied Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Heyvaert, Pauline, François Randour, Jérémy Dodeigne, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Wikipedia: quotations at the interface of encyclopedic and participatory practices. Journal of Pragmatics 157 ► pp. 119 ff.
López Maestre, María D.
2020. Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt. Complutense Journal of English Studies 28 ► pp. 203 ff.
Negro Alousque, Isabel
2020. The Metaphorical Representation of Brexit in Digital Political Cartoons. Visual Communication Quarterly 27:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Sus, Monika & Marcel Hadeed
2020. Theory-infused and policy-relevant: On the usefulness of scenario analysis for international relations. Contemporary Security Policy 41:3 ► pp. 432 ff.
Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan
2020. Conclusions. In Cognitive Linguistics for Linguists [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 75 ff.
Burgers, Christian, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa & Anneke de Graaf
2019. A tale of two swamps: Transformations of a metaphorical frame in online partisan media. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 57 ff.
2019. Falling stars and sinking ships: Framing and metaphor in cartoons about Brexit. Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 302 ff.
Morozova, Olena
2019. Ukraine’s journey to Europe: strategic macronarrative and conceptual metaphors. European Security 28:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Riihimäki, Jenni
2019. At the heart and in the margins: Discursive construction of British national identity in relation to the EU in British parliamentary debates from 1973 to 2015. Discourse & Society 30:4 ► pp. 412 ff.
Silaški, Nadežda & Tatjana Đurović
2019. The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context & Media 31 ► pp. 100318 ff.
Tincheva, Nelly
2019. “Brexit means…”. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 848 ff.
Tincheva, Nelly
2020. Good Brexit, Bad Brexit: Evaluation Through Metaphoric Conceptualizations in British Media. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 10 ► pp. 149 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.