Social media and political communication
Innovation and normalisation in parallel
As the Internet has come to play a greater role in politics, there has been a
growing scholarly interest in how digital and social media are changing
politics. The competition between the innovation and normalization hypotheses
has been at the center of the debate. This article sets out to identify evidence
of innovation and normalization in terms of how politicians communicate in- and
the level of influence they are attaining within the political blogosphere. The
analyses conducted show paradoxical results as we find that those groups of
politicians who are utilizing political communication in the blogosphere in more
innovative and progressive ways – mirroring the hopes and expectations
about how social media might influence politicians and political
communication – have weaker positions within the blog network compared to
other politicians.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical discussion
- 2.1Political communication and the internet
- 2.2Individualism and political parties
- 2.3Gender and political communication
- 3.Data and methodology
- 3.1Measurements
- Dependent variables
- Independent variables
- 4.Results
- 4.1Who blogs?
- 4.2Political representatives’ use of social media
- 4.3Understanding power in the political blogosphere
- 5.Discussion
- Note
-
References
References
Agre, Philip. E.
2002 “
Real-time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process”.
The Information Society 18(5): 311–331.


Albrecht, Steffen, Maren Lübcke, and Rasco Hartig-Perschke
2007 “
Weblog Campaigning in the German Bundestag Election 2005”.
Social Science Computer Review 25(4): 504–520.


Åström, Joachim, Martin and Karlsson
2013 “
Blogging in the Shadow of Parties: Exploring Ideological Differences in Online Campaigning”.
Political Communication 30(3), 434–455.


Åström, Joachim, Martin and Karlsson
2016 “
The Feminine Style, the Male Influence, and the Paradox of Gendered Political Blogspace”.
Information, Communication & Society 19(11) 1636–1652.


Blumler, Jay. G., and Dennis Kavanagh
1999 “
The third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features”.
Political Communication 16(3): 209–230.


Bystrom, Dianne G., Mary Christine Banwart, Lynda Lee Kaid, and Terry A. Robertson
2004 Gender and Candidate Communication: Videostyle, webstyle, newsstyle. New York: Routledge.

Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs
1989 Man Cannot Speak for Her. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press

Coleman, Stephen, and Jay G. Blumler
2009 The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Coleman, Stephen, and Giles Moss
2008 “
Governing at a Distance: Politicians in the Blogosphere”.
Information Polity 13(1-2), 7–20.


Coleman, Stephen, John Taylor, and Wim van de Donk
(Eds.) 1999 Parliament in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Coleman, Stephen
2005 “
New Mediation and Direct Representation: Reconceptualizing Representation in the Digital Age”.
New Media & Society, 7(2), 177–198.


Denters, Bas, and Jan-Peter Klok
2013 “
Citizen Democracy and the Responsiveness of Councillors: The Effects of Democratic Institutionalisation on the Role Orientations and Role Behaviour of Councillors”.
Local government studies 39(5), 661–680.


Dolan, Kathleen
2014 “
Gender stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?”
Political Research Quarterly 67(1), 96–107.


Ekdale, Brian. Kang Namkoong, Kang, Timothy K.F Fung, and David Perlmutter, David
2010 “
Why Blog? (Then and Now): Exploring the Motivations for Blogging by Popular American Political Bloggers”.
New Media & Society 121, 217–234.


Fung, Archon
2006 “
Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance”.
Public Administration Review 66(s1), 66–75.


Gibson, Rachel, and Andrea Römmele
2001 “
Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning”.
The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6(4), 31–43.


Gilljam, Mikael, David Karlsson, and Anders Sundell
2010 “
Representationsprinciper i Riksdag och Kommuner” in
Brothén, Martin &
Holmberg, Sören (Eds.)
Folkets Representanter: En bok om Riksdagsledamöter och Politisk Representation i Sverige, 35–64. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga Institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet.

Harp, Dustin, Mark and Tremayne
2006 “
The Gendered Blogosphere: Examining Inequality Using Network and Feminist Theory”.
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 83(2), 247–264.


Hindman, Matthew
2008 The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press.

Jackson, Nigel
2008 “
‘Scattergun’ or ‘Rifle’ Approach to Communication: MPs in the Blogosphere”.
Information Polity, 13(1-2), 97–109.


Johnston, Anne, Barbara Friedman, and Sarah Peach
2011 “
Standpoint in Political Blogs: Voice, Authority, and Issues”.
Women’s Studies 40(3), 269–298


Karlsson, Martin
2013a “
Representation as Interactive Communication: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings”.
Information, Communication & Society 16(8), 1201–1222.


Karlsson, Martin
2013b Covering distance: Essays on Representation and Political Communication. Örebro: Örebro university.

Karlsson, Martin, and Åström, Joachim
2016 “
The political Blog Space: A New Arena for Political Representation?”
New Media & Society 18(3): 1461–4448.


Karlsen, Rune
2009 “
Campaign Communication and the Internet: Party Strategy in the 2005 Norwegian Election Campaign”.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19(2), 183–202.


Lawson-Borders, Graice, and Rita Kirk
2005 “
Blogs in campaign communication”.
American Behavioral Scientist 49(4): 548–559.


Martin, John Levi
2017 Thinking Through Methods: A Social Science Primer. University of Chicago Press.


Margolis, Michael, and David Resnick
2000 Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace Revolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Meeks, Lindsey
2016 “
Gendered Styles, Gendered Differences: Candidates’ Use of Personalization and Interactivity on Twitter”.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(4), 295–310.


Norris, Pippa
2000 A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Norris, Pippa
2001 Digital divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Norton, Phillip
2007 “
Four Models of Political Representation: British MPs and the Use of ICT”.
The Journal of Legislative Studies 13(3), 354–369.


Persson, J., and Richard Öhrvall
2008 Förtroendevalda i Kommuner och Landsting 2007: En Rapport om Politikerantal och Representativitet. Stockholm, Sweden: Statistiska centralbyrån.

Putnam, Robert David
2000 “
Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital”. In
Lane Crothers &
Charles Lockhart (Eds.)
Culture and politics: A Reader, 223–234. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

Razin, Eran
2013 “
Councillors and their Parties”. In
Local councillors in Europe, 51–62. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.


Sampaio, Anna and Janni Aragon
1997 “
‘To Boldly go (where no Man has Gone before)’: Women and Politics in Cyberspace”.
New Political Science 19(3), 145–168.

Sanbonmatsu, Kira
2002 “
Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice”.
American Journal of Political Science 46(1), 20–34.


Schweitzer, Eva Johanna
2008 “
Innovation or Normalization in e-Campaigning? A longitudinal Content and Structural Analysis of German Party Websites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections”.
European Journal of Communication 23(4): 449–470.


Segerberg, Alexandra and Lance Bennett
2011 “
Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of two Climate Change Protests”.
The Communication Review 14(3), 197–215.


Shahin, Jamal, and Christine Neuhold
2007 “
‘Connecting Europe’: The Use of ‘New’ Information and Communication Technologies within European Parliament Standing Committees”.
The Journal of Legislative Studies 13(3), 388–402.


Shaw, Aaron and Yoshi Benkler
2012 “
A tale of two Blogospheres: Discursive Practices on the Left and Right”.
American Behavioral Scientist 56(4), 459–487.


Stanley, J. Woody, and Christopher Weare
2004 “
The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation Evidence from an Agency Online Discussion Forum”.
Administration & Society 36(5), 503–527.


Trammell, Kaye D., Alek Tarkowski, Justyna Hofmokl, and Amanda M. Sapp
2006 “
Republic of Blog: Examining Polish bloggers through Content Analysis”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2), 702–722.


Wright, Scott
2008 “
Read my day? Communication, Campaigning and Councillors’ blogs”.
Information Polity 13(1–2), 41–55.


Wright, Scott
2012 “
Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation”.
New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261.


Zittel, Thomas, and Thomas Gschwend
2008 “
Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections”.
West European Politics 31(5), 978–1003.


Zittel, Thomas
2003 Political Representation in the Networked Society: the Americanisation of European systems of Responsible Party Government? The Journal of Legislative Studies 9(3), 32–53.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.