A sentiment democracy?: When (and when not) politicians follow their Followers

Ceron, Andrea

doi:10.1075/jlp.17007.cer

Article published In:

Re/constructing Politics Through Social & Online Media: Discourses, ideologies, and mediated political practices
Edited by Michał Krzyżanowski and Joshua A. Tucker
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:2] 2018
► pp. 241–257

A sentiment democracy?

When (and when not) politicians follow their Followers

Andrea Ceron | Università degli Studi di Milano

Does the interaction with the opinions of ‘friends’ and ‘followers’ affect the behavior of politicians? So far, little attention has been devoted to the effect of social networking sites (SNS) on ‘hard politics’ choices. Focusing on two case studies related to Italian politics, namely the debate on the civil unions bill and the ‘Fertility Day’ crisis, in 2016, this paper tries to fill this gap assessing the influence of SNS on the behavior of politicians. For this purpose, supervised aggregated sentiment analysis and time series analysis are used to evaluate whether politicians surrender to the pressure put on them by their followers. The findings highlight some positive effects in terms of accountability/transparency, though in terms of responsiveness politics seems to continue as usual, and the road toward a full ‘sentiment democracy’ is still far ahead.

Keywords: Parliamentary votes, Government communication, Twitter, Facebook, Sentiment Analysis, e-democracy, responsiveness, accountability

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.Literature and theoretical framework
3.Methodology
4.First case study: Voting the civil unions bill
5.Second case study: The ‘Fertility Day’ campaign crisis
6.Discussion
Acknowledgements
Notes
References

Published online: 20 October 2017

https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17007.cer

References

Ceron, Andrea

2016 “Competing Principals 2.0? The impact of Facebook in the 2013 selection of the Italian Head of State.” Italian Political Science Review 46(3): 313–333.

2017a “Intra-party politics in 140 characters.” Party Politics 23(1): 7–17.

2017b Social Media and Political Accountability: Bridging the Gap between Citizens and Politicians. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ceron, Andrea, Luigi Curini, and Stefano Iacus

2016 “iSA: a fast, scalable and accurate algorithm for sentiment analysis of social media content.” Information Sciences 367–368: 105–124.

Chadwick, Andrew, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley

2016 “Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline or Party Renewal?” International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 283–293.

Fraustino, Julia D., and Liang Ma

2015 “CDC’s Use of Social Media and Humor in a Risk Campaign – “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse”.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 43(2): 222–241.

Gibson, Rachel K.

2015 “Party Change, Social Media and the Rise of ‘Citizen-Initiated’ Campaigning.” Party Politics 21(2): 183–197.

Graham, Todd, Dan Jackson, and Marcel Broersma

2016 “New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns.” New Media & Society 18(5): 765–783.

Hoffmann, Marc, Mathieu Rosenbaum, and Nakahiro Yoshida

2013 “Estimation of the lead – lag parameter from non-synchronous data.” Bernoulli 19(2): 426–461.

Howard, Philip N.

2005 New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Karlsson, Martin, and Joachim Åström

2016 “The political blog space: A new arena for political representation?” New Media & Society 18(3): 465–483.

Larsson, Anders O.

2013 ““Rejected bits of program code”: Why notions of “Politics 2.0” remain (mostly) unfulfilled.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 10(1): 72–85.

Larsson, Anders O., and Øyvind Ihlen

2015 “Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections.” European Journal of Communication 30(6): 666–681.

Margetts, Helen

2006 “Cyber Parties.” In Handbook of Party Politics ed by Richard Katz and William Crotty, 528–535. London: Sage.

Mosca, Lorenzo, Cristian Vaccari, and Augusto Valeriani

2015 “An Internet-Fuelled Party? The Five Star Movement and the Web.” In Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement: Organisation, Communication and Ideology ed by Filippo Tronconi, 127–152. Farnham: Ashgate.

Neuman, Russell W., Lauren Guggenheim, S. Mo Jang, and Soo Young Bae

2014 “The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data.” Journal of Communication 64(2): 194–214.

Niederdeppe, Jeff, Kathryn Heley, and Colleen Barry

2015 “Inoculation and Narrative Strategies in Competitive Framing of Three Health Policy Issues.” Journal of Communication 65(5): 838–862.

Scarrow, Susan E.

2015 Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suler, John

2004 “The online disinhibition effect.” CyberPsychology and Behavior 7(3): 321–326.

Tromble, Rebekah

2016 “Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter.” New Media & Society.

Vaccari, Cristian, and Augusto Valeriani

2015 “Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 Italian general election campaign.” New Media and Society 17(7): 1025–1042.

2016 “Party Campaigners or Citizen Campaigners? How Social Media Deepen and Broaden Party-Related Engagement.” International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 294–312.

Vergeer, Maurice, Liesbeth Hermans, and Steven Sam

2013 “Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: the exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style.” Party Politics 19(3): 477–501.

Wright, Scott

2012 “Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation.” New Media & Society 14(2): 244–261.