Online negativity in Canada
Do party leaders attack on Twitter?
Negative campaigning emphasizes what is wrong with an opponent, in terms of policy or personality. American research shows that negative campaigning online has become entrenched. The objective of this paper is to provide an empirical account of the amount and condition of negative messages produced on Twitter by Canadian party leaders. The data comes from a content analysis of tweets in two elections held in 2011. This paper has two research questions: first, what is the tone of Twitter communication? Is there differential use of Twitter by incumbents and challengers in terms of tone? Despite expectations, the data shows Canadian party leaders infrequently attack opponents on Twitter; less than 10% of tweets are negative. This said, we do find evidence that challengers are more likely than incumbents to go negative on Twitter. The paper concludes by considering the implications of this finding for future research on online negativity.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Negativity in campaigns
- Online negativity: Empirical research review
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References
Ancu, Monica
2010 “
From Soundbite to Textbite: Election 2008 Comments on Twitter.” In
Techno Politics in Presidential Campaigning: New Voices, New Technologies, and New Voters, edited by
John Allen Hendricks and
Lynda Lee Kaid, 11–21. New York: Routledge.

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar
2010 Going Negative: How Political Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Banwart, Mary Christine
2004 “
Webstyles in 2004: The Gendering of Candidates on Campaign Web Sites.” In
The Internet Election: Perspectives on the Web in Campaign, edited by
Andrew Paul Williams and
John C. Tedesco, 37–56. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Benoit, William L.
2011 “
Content Analysis in Political Communication.” In
Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by
Erik P. Bucy and
R. Lance Holbert, 268–79. New York: Taylor and Francis.

Canadian Press
2011 “
Social Media Takes Off in First Week of Election Campaign: Political Leaders Rely on Social Media Users to Pick up and Spread the Message.”
News 1130,
April 2 2017
[URL].
Chadwick, Andrew
2006 Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press.

Cunningham, Stanley B.
1999 “
The Theory and Use of Political Advertising.” In
Television Advertising in Canadian Elections: The Attack Mode, 1993, edited by
Walter I. Romanow,
Michel de Repentigny,
Stanley B. Cunningham,
Walter C. Soderlund, and
Kai Hildebrand, 11–25. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Druckman, James N., Martin J. Kifer, and Michael Parkin
2010 “
Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006.”
Political Communication 27 (1): 88–103.


Ellis, Faron, and Peter Woolstencroft
2006 “
A Change of Government, Not a Change of Country: Conservatives in the 2006 Federal Election.” In
The Canadian Federal Election of 2006, edited by
Chris Dornan and
Jon H. Pammett, 58–92. Toronto: Dundurn.

Fekete, Jason
2012 “
New Conservative Attack Ads Target Mulcair and NDP Economic Policies.”
Canada.com,
June 25 2012
[URL].
Fridkin, Kim L., and Patrick J. Kenney
2008 “
The Dimensions of Negative Messages.”
American Politics Research 36 (5): 694–723.


Galloway, Gloria
2012 “
With NDP Riding High, Tories at Last Hit Mulcair with Attack Ads.”
The Globe and Mail,
June 25 2012
[URL].
Geer, John Gray
2006 In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Book, Whole. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Harpham, Edward J.
1999 “
Going On-Line: The 1998 Congressional Campaign.” 95th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ipsos Reid
2011 “
Canada’s Love Affair with Online Social Networking Continues” Accessed May 29, 2011.
[URL].
Kahn Fridkin, Kim, and Patrick J. Kenney
2004 No Holds Barred: Negativity in US Senate Campaigns. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Kaid, Lynda Lee
2000 “
Ethics and Political Advertising.” In
Political Communication Ethics: An Oxymoron?, edited by
Robert E. Denton, 147–77. Westport: Praeger.

Klotz, Robert
1997 “
Positive Spin: Senate Campaigning on the Web.”
PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (3): 482–86.

Klotz, Robert
1998 “
Virtual Criticism: Negative Advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate Races.”
Political Communication 15 (3): 347–65.


Klotz, Robert
2004 The Politics of Internet Communication. Book, Whole. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Lau, Richard R., and Gerald M. Pomper
2004 Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of Us Senate Elections. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Lombard, Matthew, Jennifer Snyder‐Duch, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken
2002 “
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability.”
Human Communication Research 28 (4): 587–604.


Margolis, Michael, and David Resnick
2000 Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace Revolution. Book, Whole. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mark, David
2009 Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Book, Whole. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Momoc, Antonio
2012 “
The Presidential Candidates on Twitter during the 2009 Romanian Elections.”
Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, no. 1: 21–37.

Moody, Mia, Liz Cohen, and Claire Fournon
2013 “
Negativity in a Twitter Age: How Politicians Are Adapting to Social Media.”
Journal of Mass Communication and Journalism 3 (151).

Rose, Jonathan
2012 “
Are Negative Ads Positive? Political Advertising and the Permanent Campaign.” In
How Canadians Communicate IV: Media and Politics, edited by
David Taras and
Christopher Waddell, 41:149–68. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.

Rosenstiel, Tom, Amy Mitchell, and Mark Jurkowitz
2012 “
Winning the Media Campaign 2012: Both Candidates Received More Negative than Positive Coverage in Mainstream News, but Social Media Was Even Harsher. Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism,
November 2 2012
[URL].
Schweitzer, Eva Johanna
2008 “
Innovation or Normalization in E-Campaigning? A Longitudinal Content and Structural Analysis of German Party Websites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections.”
European Journal of Communication 23 (4): 449–70.


Schweitzer, Eva Johanna
2010 “
Global Patterns of Virtual Mudslinging? The Use of Attacks on German Party Websites in State, National and European Parliamentary Elections.”
German Politics 19 (2): 200–221.


Small, Tamara A.
2012 “
E-Ttack Politics: Negativity, the Internet & Canadian Political Parties.” In
How Canadians Communicate IV: Media and Politics, edited by
David Taras and
Christopher Waddell, 169–88. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.

Soroka, Stuart, Fred Cutler, Dietlind Stolle, and Patrick Fournier
2011 “
Capturing Change (and Stability) in the 2011 Campaign.”
Policy Options 321: 70–77.

Souley, Boubacar, and Robert H. Wicks
2005 “
Tracking the 2004 Presidential Campaign Web Sites Similarities and Differences.”
American Behavioral Scientist 49 (4): 535–47.


Taras, David
1990 The Newsmakers: The Media’s Influence on Canadian Politics. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.

Trammell, Kaye D.
2006 “
Blog Offensive: An Exploratory Analysis of Attacks Published on Campaign Blog Posts from a Political Public Relations Perspective.”
Public Relations Review 32 (4): 402–6.


Trent, Judith S., and Robert V. Friedenberg
2008 Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

West, Darrell M.
2013 Air Wars: Television Advertising and Social Media in Election Campaigns, 1952–2012. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

Wicks, Robert H., and Boubacar Souley
2003 “
Going Negative: Candidate Usage of Internet Web Sites During the 2000 Presidential Campaign.”
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80 (1): 128–44.


Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
De Mulder, August & Steve Paulussen
2021.
Mediakritiek of anti-journalistiek?.
Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap
49:3

Haman, Michael & Milan Školník
2021.
Politicians on Social Media. The online database of members of national parliaments on Twitter.
El profesional de la información 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.