Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 17:1 (2018) ► pp. 24–45

The roles of field and capital in negotiating language policy in the Slovene parliament

| Prince of Songkla University
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of integrating Bourdieu’s notions of field and capital in discursive analyses of language policy. The paper presents an analysis of a debate in a committee session of the Slovene parliament, where different actors negotiated about the contents of a language policy strategy. The study draws on nexus analysis by focussing on the situated nature of discursive actions in particular settings, and presents a historical ethnography which combines analysis of transcripts with interviews and a detailed examination of policy documents. The analysis uncovers the efforts of actors to legitimize their authority and achieve their goals with the support of capital accumulated in different fields, and focusses particularly on the dynamics involved in translating the value of sources of capital across the borders of different fields.
Keywords: language policy, parliamentary discourse, field, capital
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17013.sav
References

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barakos, Elizabeth, and Johann W. Unger
eds. 2016 Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1984 Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1986 “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
1993 The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Geoffrey
2013 “How Does a Prime Minister Speak? Kevin Rudd’s discourse, habitus, and negotiation of the journalistic and political fields.” Journal of Language and Politics 12 (4): 485–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1994 “Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer.” In The Authority of the Consumer, edited by Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 235–241. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2012 Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Christian Schneickert
2016 “Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and critical discourse studies.” Discourse and Society 27 (3): 293–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galasinska, Aleksandra, and Michał Krzyżanowski
eds. 2009 Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, R. Stuart, and Ribes, David
2011 “Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices.” In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Koloa, Kauai, HI, 1–10. Retrieved from http://​www​.stuartgeiger​.com​/trace​-ethnography​-hicss​-geiger​-ribes​.pdf
Habermas, Jürgen
1989 The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak
2008 The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H.
2005 “Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in heritage language education.” Modern Language Journal 89 (4): 605–609.Google Scholar
Hult, Francis M.
2010 “Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 202: 7–24.Google Scholar
2015 “Making Policy Connections across Scales Using Nexus Analysis.” In Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning, edited by Francis M. Hult, and David C. Johnson, 217–232. Maiden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard
2007 “The meaning of policy/policy as meaning.” In Policy Reconsidered: Meanings, Politics and Practices, edited by Susan M. Hodgson, and Zoe Irving, 21–36. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob
2014 “Repoliticising depoliticisation: theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and Eurozone debt crises.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 207–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David C., and Eric J. Johnson
2015 “Power and agency in language policy appropriation.” Language Policy 14 (3): 221–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David C.
2011 “Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 267–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Language Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Källkvist, Marie, and Francis M. Hult
2016 “Discursive mechanisms and human agency in language policy formation: negotiating bilingualism and parallel language use at a Swedish university.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19: 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Peter Davidson
2008 “Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy-making.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 307–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
2011 “Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy.” Language Policy 10 (2): 115–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2013 “Policy, policy communication and discursive shifts: Analyzing EU policy discourses on climate change.” In Analysing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, edited by Piotr Cap, and Urszula Okulska, 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: A critical discourse analysis.” Social Semiotics 24: 345–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Bradley, Margaret Sutton, and Teresa Winstead
2009 “Educational Policy as a Practice of Power: Theoretical Tool, Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options.” Educational Policy 23 (6): 767–795. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael
2010 Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (30th anniversary expanded edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hilgers, Mathieu, and Éric Mangez
2014 “Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social fields.” In Field Theory: Concepts and Applications, edited by Mathieu Hilgers, and Éric Mangez, 1–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maton, Karl
2005 “A question of autonomy: Bourdieu’s field approach and higher education policy.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 687–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2015 “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Savski, Kristof
2016 “Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in Slovene government documents.” Language Policy 15 (4): 505–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Language policy at times of instability and struggle: The impact of fluctuating will and competing agendas on a Slovene language strategy.” Current Issues in Language Planning 18 (3): 283–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press. “Monolingualism and prescriptivism: the ecology of Slovene in the 20th Century.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Scollon
2004 Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron
1998 Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001a Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b “Action and text: towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 139–183. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
2008 Analyzing Public Discourse: Discourse Analysis in the Making of Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Unger, Johann W.
2013 The Discursive Construction of the Scots Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
1993 “Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: a synopsis.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 193–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, Diane
2004 “Theorizing disaster: Analogy, historical ethnography and the Challenger accident.” Ethnography 5 (3): 315–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–22. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2000 “From conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy paper.” In European Union Discourses on Un/employment: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Employment, Policy-making and Organizational Change, edited by Peter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 73–114. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009 The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Savski, Kristof
2020. Local problems and a global solution: examining the recontextualization of CEFR in Thai and Malaysian language policies. Language Policy 19:4 ► pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
Savski, Kristof
2020. Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.