Mega discourses, as discourses recognised and espoused at the broader societal level, enact the taken-for-granted premises governing an organisational sector. The dominant power can designate the value, norm and moral duty of an organisational sector through manipulating such mega discourses. Conceptualised within critical discourse studies and Chinese discourse studies, this article assesses the official discourse of China’s third sector circulating in the policy documents, political speeches, and news media, illustrating how China’s authoritarian state utilises discursive strategies to articulate a new order of discourse of the third sector. It argues that such an alternative discursive ordering is significantly different from its western counterpart. The authoritarian state has strategically appropriated historical and cultural resources to legitimise such a “de-SMOisation” process, intending to insulate nongovernmental organisations from social movements. This study concludes with a discussion on the significance and implications of this third sector discourse.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306.
Bogren, Alexandra
2010 “Studying Social Power in Textual Data: Combining Tools for Analyzing Meaning and Positioning.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 73–84.
Brady, Anne-Marie
2008Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
2005 “Speech at the National Conference on the Administration of Social Organisations, September 19, 1992.” In Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations (1949–2004), ed. by Editorial Committee of Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations, 11:11–16. Beijing: China Society Publishing House.
Corry, Olaf
2010 “Defining and Theorizing the Third Sector.” In Third Sector Research, ed. by Rupert Taylor, 11–20. New York: Springer.
Editorial Committee of Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations
2005Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations (1949–2004). Vol. 11. Beijing: China Society Publishing House.
Fairclough, Norman
2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Fan, Baojun
2005 “Speech at the Inaugural Meeting of the Association of Chinese Societies, August 25, 1989.” In Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations (1949–2004), ed. by Editorial Committee of Yearbook of China’s Folk Organisations, 11:38–42. Beijing: China Society Publishing House.
Grant, David, and Robert J. Marshak
2011 “Toward a Discourse-Centered Under-standing of Organizational Change.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 47 (2): 204–235.
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise
2000 “Discourse, Organizations and National Cultures.” Discourse Studies 2 (1): 5–33.
He, Qinglian
2014 “Jingwai shili zai zhongguo zhengzhi zhong de qianshijinsheng [The past and the present of foreign forces in Chinese politics].” voachinese.com. [URL]
Hsu, Jennifer Y. J., and Reza Hasmath
2016 “Governing and Managing NGOs in China: An Introduction.” In NGO Governance and Management in China, ed. by Jennifer Y. J. Hsu and Reza Hasmath, 1–8. London: Routledge.
Hu, Angang
2013 “Why the People’s Society Is Better than the Civil Society.” The People Daily (Oversea Edition), July19.
Huang, Guangsheng Vincent
2014 “Transnational Information Politics: The Interaction between Local Contentions and International Media.” Communication & Society, 301: 157–190.
Iedema, Rick, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Introduction: Organizational Discourses and Practices.” Discourse & Society 10 (1): 5–19.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2011 “Political Communication, Institutional Cultures and Linearities of Organisational Practice: A Discourse-Ethnographic Approach to Institutional Change in the European Union.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 281–296.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2014 “Discourse and Communication in the European Union: A Multi-Focus Perspective of Critical Discourse Studies.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 407–432. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2016 “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 308–321.
Lang, Sabine
2012NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ocasio, William, Michael Mauskapf, and Christopher W. J. Steele
2016 “History, Society, and Institutions: The Role of Collective Memory in the Emergence and Evolution of Societal Logics.” Academy of Management Review 41 (4): 676–699.
Qian, Gang
2015Yuxiang guijue: Zhongguo zhengqing jiema [Red code: Reading China through the political discourse of the CCP]. Hong Kong: Journalism and Media Study Centre, the University of Hong Kong.
Sagiv, Lilach, and Shalom H. Schwartz
2007 “Cultural Values in Organisations: Insights for Europe.” European Journal of International Management 1 (3): 176–190.
2005A Cultural Approach to Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shi-Xu
2014Chinese Discourse Studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sidani, Yusuf, and Sammy Showail
2013 “Religious Discourse and Organizational Change: Legitimizing the Stakeholder Perspective at a Saudi Conglomerate.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 26 (6): 931–947.
Thompson, Neil
2002 “Social Movements, Social Justice and Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 32 (6): 711–722.
Thornton, Patricia M.
2016 “Experimenting with Party-Led ‘people’s Society’: Four Regional Models.” In NGO Governance and Management in China, ed. by Reza Hasmath and Jennifer Y. J. Hsu, 137–150. London: Routledge.
2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 115–140.
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zald, Mayer N., and Roberta Ash
1966 “Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay, and Change.” Social Forces 44 (3): 327–41. –
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Huang, Vincent G. & Tingting Liu
2022. Gamifying Contentious Politics: Gaming Capital and Playful Resistance. Games and Culture 17:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Huang, Vincent Guangsheng & Xueqing Li
2022. Diffusion-Proofing Protest Paradigm: Mass Media and China's Prevention of Social Movement Spillover During the Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement. The International Journal of Press/Politics► pp. 194016122211232 ff.
Huang, Vincent Guangsheng & Zhuoxiao Xie
2024. Platform-based diffusion-proofing: Digitally mediated discursive practice and China’s prevention of protest spillover during Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill Movement. Discourse & Communication
Huang, Yalan, Tingting Liu & Yinkun Chen
2023. The (unlocated) in-game gender performativity in contemporary China: Exploring gender swapping practices in the online game sphere. Feminist Media Studies► pp. 1 ff.
Sun, Yu & Vincent Guangsheng Huang
2022. Embedded data activism: the institutionalization of a grassroots environmental data initiative in China. Chinese Journal of Communication 15:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.