National identity premises in Pakistani social media debate over patriotism
This paper focuses on critical discourse analysis of national identity premises as they enter in Pakistan’s social
media debate over patriotism and treason. Drawing on a theoretical framework that calls attention to the embeddedness of religious
and nationalistic ideas in identification paradigm of a society, the analysis emphasizes the naturalized link in
motivational/inspirational and factual/circumstantial premises and the discursive and non-discursive practices of a culture. It
also shows how (supposed) lack of a clear sense of national identity is intrinsically connected to a politicized understanding of
national and anti-national identities, since anti-national identity is made salient as an obstacle in path toward national
acceptance, and thus as a threat to national security. This, it is argued, is achieved through certain discursive strategies and
non-discursive acts which serve to position undesirable anti-nationals as simultaneously in need of proving their patriotism and
ineligible for integration into a broader national identification paradigm.
Article outline
- 1.Preliminary considerations
- 2.Discourse, national identity and social media
- 3.Nationalism and individual/collective commitments as integral reasons for loyalty towards state: Treason vs. patriotism
- 4.Theory and method
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1National identity, identification of traitors and high form of patriotism: Use of attributive phrases and relational-attributive clauses
- 5.2Extreme nationalistic sentiments, attribution of blame and types of patriotism
- 5.2.1Uncritical patriotism: Expressions of polarity
- 5.2.2Constructive patriotism: Typical mood in clause
- 5.3Martyrdom: A yardstick to measure good patriotism
- 6.Summary of the findings
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (42)
References
Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses”. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Retrived May 29, 2014. [URL]
Althusser, Louis. 1977. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.
Barrett, Rob. 2009. Disloyalty and Destruction: Religion and Politics in Deuteronomy and the Modern World. New York. T and T Clark International.
Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
Brubaker, Rogers. 2007. “In the Name of the Nation: Reflections on Nationalism and Patriotism”. In The Many Faces of Patriotism, ed. by Philip Abbott, 37–51. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
Chengappa, Bidana M. 2004. Pakistan, Islamisation, Army and Foreign Policy. New Delhi: APH Publishers.
Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkin University Press.
Fairclough, Isabella and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992a. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992b. “Discourse and text: Linguistic intertextual analysis within discourse analysis”. Discourse and Society 3, no.2: 193–217. .
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and Power: London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analyzing Discourse and Text: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Gilmore, Jason, Lindsey Meeks and David Domke. 2013. “Why Do (We Think) They Hate Us: Anti-Americanism, Patriotic Messages, and Attributions of Blame”. International Journal of Communication 71: 701–721. [URL].
Glukhov, Andrey P. 2016. “Construction of national identity through a social network: a case study of ethnic networks of immigrants to Russia from Central Asia”. In AI and Society 32, no. 1: 101–108. .
Haeri, Shahla. 2002. No Shame for the Sun: Lives of Professional Pakistani Women. New York: Syracuse.
Halliday, M. A. K., 1984. “Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue”. The Semiotics of Culture and Language. 11. Robin P. Fawcett; M. A. K. Halliday; Sydney Lamb and Adam Makkai (eds.). 3–35. Pinter, London.
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Introduction to Functional Grammar 3rd Edition. Abington & New York: Oxford.
Huddy, Leonie and Nadia Khatib. 2007. “American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement”. American Journal of Political Science 51, no.1: 63–77. [URL].
Linklater, Andrew and Michael Waller. 2003. “Loyalty and the post-national state”. In Political Loyalty and the Nation-State, Andrew Linklater, and Michael Waller (ed.), 1–14. New York: Routledge.
Mangold, W. Glynn, and David J. Faulds. 2009. “Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix”. HYPERLINK [URL] Business Horizons 52, no. 4, 357–365.
Matthiessen, Christian, M. I. M. 2012. “Systemic Functional Linguistics as Applicable Linguistics: Social Accountability and Critical Approaches”. In D.E.L.T.A., 281: 435–471.
Mishra, Ashutosh. 2013. “How Non-state Are Terrorist Groups in Pakistan? Analysis of State Responsibility and Accountability”. In Global Criminology: Crime and Victimization in a Globalized Era, K. Jaishankar and Natti Ronel (ed.), 3–36. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.
Murphy, Eamon. 2012. The Making of Terrorism in Pakistan: Historical and Social Roots of Extremism. New York: Routledge.
Musharraf, Pervez. 2008. In the Line of Fire. London: Simon and Schuster.
Nabi, Nuran. 2010. Bullets of ’71: A Freedom Fighter’s Story. Bloomington: Author House.
Nathanson, Stephen. 1989. “In defense of moderate patriotism”. Ethics 99, no. 3: 535–552.
Nathanson, Stephen. 1993. Patriotism, Morality and Peace. Maryland: Rowmanand Littlefield Publishers.
Raghavan, Srinath. 2013. 1971: A Global History of the Creation of Bangladesh. USA: Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publishing Data.
Rizwan, Snobra. 2018. “Identity(ies) in Counter-terrorism Discourse: Analyzing Discursive Strategies of Pakistan’s Constructive Patriots”. Kashmir Journal of Language Research [Forthcoming].
Rizwan, Snobra. 2015. “Foreign Agents and Bribe Takers”: Strategies used by Pakistani Far Right to Counter Accusations of Pro-Talibanization” In GLS: Grazer Linguistische Studien 821: 27–46.
Rosser, Yvette Claire. 2006. “The Islamization of Pakistani Social Studies Textbooks”. In What Shall We Tell the Children? International Perspectives on School History Textbooks, Stuart J. Foster and Keith Crawford (ed.), 179–194. USA: Information age Publishing.
Sahar, Gail. 2008. “Patriotism, attributions for the 9/11 attacks, and support for war: Then and now”. In Basic and Applied Social Psychology 30, no. 3, 189–197. .
Schatz, Robert T., Ervin Staub and Howard Lavine. 1999. “On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism”. In Political Psychology 20, no. 1: 151–174.
Taylor, Milton W. 2014. Viruses and Man: A History of Interactions. Bloomington: Springer.
Tolstoy, Leo. 1922. Essays, Letters and Miscellanies. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford.
Wodak, Ruth and Martin Reisigl. 2001. “Discourse Historical Approach”. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, 87–121. London: Sage.
Worth, Richard and Sara Louise Kras. 2007. Pervez Musharraf. New York: Infobase Publishing.
Young, Lynne and Claire Harrison. 2004. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change. New York: Continuum.
Zappavigna, Michelle (ed.). 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on Web. New York: Continuum.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kuraishi, Anam
2024.
Talking Post-Truth: Elite Rhetoric on Democracy in Pakistan.
SSRN Electronic Journal
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.