Cover not available
Article published In:
Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’
Edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:4] 2017
► pp. 497–509

Right-wing populism and market-fundamentalism

Two mutually reinforcing threats to democracy in the 21st century

 | Cusanus Hochschule, Bernkastel-Kues
 | Johannes Kepler University Linz
The article compares market fundamentalism and right-wing populism on the basis of its core patterns of thinking and reasoning. Based on an analysis of the work of important founders of market fundamental economic thinking and the arguments brought forward by leading right-wing populist we find many similarities of these two concepts in their "inner images". Thus, we develop a scheme of the similar dual social worlds of right-wing-populism and market fundamentalism and offer some recent examples of market fundamentalism and right-wing populism mutually reinforcing each other or serving as a gateway for each other. We then apply our scheme for the analysis of the recent political developments and its ideological roots in the US under Donald Trump. The main conclusion of this article is that market fundamentalism and right-wing populism together must be seen as two mutually reinforcing threats to democracy in the 21st century.
Keywords: Right-wing populism, market-fundamentalism, inner images, Donald Trump, patterns of thinking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language is based on mental images
  • 3.Two mutually reinforcing concepts
    • 3.1The worldview of demagogy
    • 3.2Market-fundamentalism
    • 3.3Two dual images
    • 3.4Linkages of market-fundamentalism and right-wing populism (resp. demagogy)
  • 4.Conclusion: A process of radicalization
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17027.ots
References (39)
References
Abelson, Donald. 1995. “From policy research to political advocacy: The changing role of think tanks in American politics.” Canadian Review of American Studies 25(1): 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brulle, Robert. J. 2014. “Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations.” Climatic Change 122 (4): 681–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derks, Lucas. 2005. Social Panoramas. Changing the Unconscious Landscape with NLP and Psychotherapy, Camarthen, Wales: Crown House Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Derks, Lucas, Walter Ötsch, and Wolfgang Walker. 2016. “Relationships are Constructed from Generalized Unconscious Social Images Kept in Steady Locations in Mental Space”. Journal of Experiential Psychotherapy 731: 3–16.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, Lanny. 2014. “The Increasingly Libertarian Milton Friedman: An Ideological Profile”. Economic Journal Watch 111: 81–96.Google Scholar
Eucken, Walter. 2004. Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik [Principles of Economic Policy]. Bern, Tübingen: Francke, Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
. 1965. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie [Foundation of Economics]. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Karin. 2009. “The Influence of Neoliberals in Chile before, during, and after Pinochet”. In The Road from Mont Pèlerin. The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, ed. by Philip Mirowski, and Dieter Plehwe, 305–346. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2012. Pity the Billionaire. The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Sebastian. 2015. Der Aufstieg der AfD. Neokonservative Mobilmachung in Deutschland [The Rise of AfD. Neoconservative Mobilization in Germany]. Berlin: Bertz&Fischer.Google Scholar
Girkinger, Michael. 2007. “’Erklär’ mir die Welt‘ – Neoliberale Bewusstseinsarbeit am Beispiel des Wiener Hayek Instituts“ [‘Explain the World to me‘ – Neoliberal Consciousness-Raising of the Hayek Institute], ÖZP 361: 201–218.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. A. 1949. “The Intellectuals and Socialism”. The University of Chicago Law Review: 417–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976/1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981. Interview with “el Mercurio”, 12 April 1981. Santiago de Chile, D8-D9.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. ”Embodied understanding“. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 875.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Rafael Nunez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lütjen, Torben. 2016. Partei der Extreme: Die Republikaner [Party of Extremes: The Republicans]. Bielefeld: transkript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Willard, Joseph Newhouse, Naihua Duan, Emmett Keeler, and Arleen Leibowitz. 1987. “Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment”. The American Economic Review, 771: 251–277.Google Scholar
McGann, James. 1992. “Academics to Ideologues: A Brief History of the Public Policy Research Industry.” Political Science & Politics 251: 733–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Mises, Lduwig. 1996/1929. A Critique of Interventionism. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist”. Government and Opposition 391: 542–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muller, Christopher. 1998. “The institute of economic affairs: Undermining the post-war consensus”. Contemporary British History 101: 88–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ORF (ed.) 1983. Franz Kreuzer im Gespräch mit Friedrich von Hayek und Ralf Dahrendorf [Franz Kreuzer in interviews with Friedrich von Hayek and Ralf Dahrendorf]. Wien: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Ötsch, Walter O. Jakob Kapeller. 2010. “Perpetuing the Failure: Economic Education and the Current Crisis.” Journal of Social Science Education 91: 16–25.Google Scholar
Ötsch, Walter O. 2013. “The Deep Meaning of ‘Market’: Understanding Neoliberal-Market-Radical Reasoning,” Human Geography 61: 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Haider Light. Handbuch für Demagogie [Haider Light. Handbook for Demagogues], 5th ed. Wien: Czernin.Google Scholar
Ötsch, Walter O., Stephan Pühringer, and Katrin Hirte. 2017. Netzwerke des Marktes. Ordoliberalismus als Politische Ökonomie [Networks of the Market. Orodoliberalism as Polical Economy]. Berlin: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Pühringer, Stephan. 2015. “Markets as ‘ultimate judges’ of economic policies – Angela Merkel´s discourse profile during the economic crisis and the European crisis policies”. On the Horizon 231: 246–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The success story of ordoliberalism as guiding principle of German economic policy”, ARENA Report, Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedidiah. 2016. “The Anti-Democratic Worldview of Steve Bannon and Peter Thiel”, Politico, November 30. Accessed January 12, 2017. [URL]
Radosh, Ronald. 2016. “Steve Bannon, Trump's Top Guy, Told Me He Was 'A Leninist' Who Wants To ‘Destroy the State’”. The Daily Beast, August 22. Accessed January 12, 2017. [URL]
Schweitzer, Eva. 2012. Tea Party: Die weiße Wut. Was Amerikas Neue Rechte so gefährlich macht [Tea Party: The White Anger]. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
The Heritage Foundation. 2016. “Blueprint for a New Administration”. Mandate for Leadership Series. Accessed January 12, 2017. [URL].
Valdés, Juan G. 1995. Pinochet’s Economics: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral (eds). 2013. Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Tanscheit, Talita
2023. Jair Bolsonaro and the defining attributes of the populist radical right in Brazil. Journal of Language and Politics 22:3 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Fucci, Anthony & Theresa Catalano
2019. Missing the (Turning) point. Journal of Language and Politics 18:3 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Shields, Stuart
2019. The paradoxes of necessity: Fail forwards neoliberalism, social reproduction, recombinant populism and Poland’s 500Plus policy. Capital & Class 43:4 ► pp. 653 ff. DOI logo
Pühringer, Stephan & Walter O. Ötsch
2018. Neoliberalism and Right-wing Populism: Conceptual Analogies. Forum for Social Economics 47:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.