Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 17:6 (2018) ► pp.713–743

Constructing the Czech nation

A discursive-theoretical analysis of the articulation of the nation in the cultural magazines produced by Czech WWII London exiles

ORCID logo | Charles University in Prague
 | Uppsala University | Vrije Universiteit Brussel | Charles University in Prague
The article’s objective is to analyse the discursive construction of the Czech nation in three cultural magazines, produced by Czech exiles in London during WWII. The theoretical backbone for this analysis is provided by Laclau and Mouffe’s (1985) discourse theory, which in turn supports a discourse-theoretical re-reading of the literature on the nation, first in general and then in relation to the Czech nation. These three theoretical components support an analysis of 650 selected contributions in 36 issues of the three main cultural journals of the Czech London exile: Obzor [Horizon], Kulturní zápisník [Cultural Notebook] and Review. This discourse-theoretical analysis shows the presence, particularity and contingency of a series of internal nodal points (temporal, spatial, linguistic, cultural and popular), in combination with the external nodal point of diversity in relation to outgroups. In the conclusion, the political nature of this construction, which we label the politics of poetry, is emphasized.
Keywords: Czech exile, World War II, London, nation, construction, resistance, culture, poetry, discourse theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse theory and the nation
  • 3.The discursive construction of the Czech nation
  • 4.The Czech exile in WWII and its historical, political and cultural context
  • 5.The construction of the Czech nation in the cultural magazines
    • 5.1Time & history
    • 5.2The space of the homeland
    • 5.3The Czech language
    • 5.4The cultivated nation
    • 5.5The Czech people
    • 5.6Constitutive outsides
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Articles cited from the exile magazines
Published online: 14 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17063.bat
References (70)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1996. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandes, Detlef. 2003. Exil v Londýně 1939–1943: Velká Británie a její spojenci Československo, Polsko a Jugoslávie mezi Mnichovem a Teheránem. [Exile in London 1939–1943: United Kingdom and its allies Czechoslovakia, Poland and Yugoslavia between Munich and Tehran]. Translated by Marek Nekula, and Alena Opletalová. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Martin D. 2006. Dealing with Democrats: the British Foreign Office and the Czechoslovak Émigrés in Great Britain, 1939 to 1945. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2017. The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2007. “Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies: The Applicability of Discourse Theoretical Analysis (DTA) for the Study of Media Practises and Discourses.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (2): 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, and Erik Spinoy. 2008. Discourse Theory and Cultural Analysis: Media, Arts and Literature. Cresskill, N.J: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Coetzee, J. M. 1999. “The Man with Many Qualities.” The New York Review of Books 46 (5): 52–55.Google Scholar
Conway, Martin, and José Gotovich (eds). 2001. Europe in Exile: European Exile Communities in Britain 1940–1945. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick. 2003. Media Rituals. A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Čapková, Kateřina. 2012. Czechs, Germans, Jews?: National Identity and the Jews of Bohemia. Translated by Derek and Marzia Paton. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Čornej, Petr, and Jiří Pokorný. 2015. A Brief History of the Czech Lands. Praha: Práh.Google Scholar
Čornej, Petr. 2000. Velké dějiny zemí Koruny české V. 1402–1437. [The great history of the Czech lands V. 1402–1437]. Praha : Paseka.Google Scholar
Čornejová, Ivana, Jiří Kaše, Jiří Mikulec, and Vít Vlnas. 2008. Velké dějiny zemí Koruny české VIII. 1618–1683. [The great history of the Czech lands VIII. 1618–1683]. Praha: Paseka.Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin. 2012. “The Rhetoric of the Flemish Populist Radical Right Party Vlaams Blok /Belang in a Context of Discursive Struggle: a Discourse-Theoretical Analysis.” PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Doležal, Jiří. 1996. Česká kultura za protektorátu: Školství, písemnictví, kinematografie. [Czech culture during the Protectorate: education, literature, cinematography]. Praha: Národní filmový archiv.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Gebhart, Jan, and Jan Kuklík. 2006. Velké dějiny zemí Koruny české XV.1938–1945. [The great history of the Czech lands XV. 1938–1945]. Praha: Paseka.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1997. Nationalism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1996. “The Question of Cultural Identity.” In Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies, ed. by Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert, and Kenneth Thompson, 595–634. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamplová, Dana. 2010. “Are Czechs the Least Religious of All?” The Guardian, June 24, 2010. Accessed April 9, 2018. [URL].
Hamplová, Dana and Zdeněk R. Nešpor. 2009. “Invisible Religion in a ‘Non-believing’ Country: The Case of the Czech Republic.” Social Compass 56 (4): 581–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hann, Chris. 2006. “Nation and Nationalism in Central and Eastern Europe.” In The SAGE Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, ed. by Gerard Delanty, and Krishan Kumar, 399–410. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hastings, Adrian. 1997. The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holocaust Encyclopedia. “The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia.” Accessed August 22, 2017. [URL].
Howarth, David. 1998. “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Research Strategies in the Social Sciences, ed. by Elinor Scarbrough, and Eric Tanenbaum, 268–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hroch, Miroslav (ed). 2003. Pohledy na národ a nacionalismus: čítanka textů. [Views of the nation and nationalism: a reading book]. Praha: SLON.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism: a Study of Its Origins and Background. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jareš, Michal. 2007. “Poezie ve sbornících britského válečného exilu. [Poetry in British war exile proceedings].” Soudobé dějiny 14 (1): 44–69.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kocourek, Milan, and Zuzana Slobodová. 2006. Česko-slovenská Británie. [Czecho-slovak Britain]. Třeboň: Carpio.Google Scholar
Kuklík, Jan. 1998. Londýnský exil a obnova československého státu 1938–1945: právní a politické aspekty obnovy Československa z hlediska prozatímního státního zřízení ČSR v emigraci. [London exile and the restoration of the Czechoslovak state 1938–1945: Legal and political aspects of the restoration of Czechoslovakia in terms of provisional state establishment of Czechoslovakia in emigration]. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. 2002. “The Myth of the Civic State: a Critical Survey of Hans Kohn’s Framework for Understanding Nationalism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (1): 20–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1988. “Metaphor and Social Antagonisms”. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. by Cary Nelson, and Lawrence Grossberg, 249–257. Urbana: University of Illinois. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy : Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London; New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Masaryk, Tomáš Garrigue. 2010. Kroměříž Lectures: Problem of a Small Nation. Translated by Stacey B. Day. Praha: Trigon.Google Scholar
Miłosz, Czesław. 1976. “Notes on Exile.” Books Abroad 50 (2): 281–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Němeček, Jan et al. (eds). 2008. Zápisy ze schůzí československé vlády v Londýně. [Minutes of the meetings of the Czechoslovak Government in London]. Praha: Masarykův ústav a Archiv AV ČR.Google Scholar
Nešpor, Zdeněk. 2010. Příliš slábi ve víře. Česká ne/religiozita v evropském kontextu. [Too weak in faith. Czech non-religiosity in European context]. Praha: Kalich.Google Scholar
Simsova, Sylva. 2009. “Who were the Pre-Second World War Refugees from Czechoslovakia?” In Exile in and from Czechoslovakia during the 1930s and 1940s, ed. by Charmian Brinson, and Marian Malet, 83–103. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srba, Bořivoj. 2003. Múzy v exilu: kulturní a umělecké aktivity čs. exulantů v Londýně v předvečer a v průběhu druhé světové války 1939–1945 : kulturní politika, “Pódiové” programy, koncerty. [Muses in exile: cultural and artistic activities of Czechoslovak exile in London on the eve and during World War II, 1939–1945: cultural policy, “stage” programs, concerts]. Brno: Vydavatelství Masarykovy university.Google Scholar
Sugar, Peter F., and Ivo J. Lederer (eds). 1969. Nationalism in Eastern Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Táborský, Eduard. 1983. Presidentův sekretář vypovídá: deník druhého zahraničního odboje. [The president’s secretary speaks: a journal of the second foreign resistance]. Curych: Konfrontace.Google Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Václavík, David. 2010. Náboženství a moderní česká společnost. [Religion and modern Czech society]. Praha: Grada.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Articles cited from the exile magazines
Beer, Bedřich. 1941. “Kultura budoucnosti. [Culture of the future].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (4): 13.Google Scholar
Berger, Walter, and Pavel Tigrid. 1943a. “The Czech Poetry of Faith and Hope.” Review-43 1 (1): 28–32.Google Scholar
. 1943b. “Comment.” Review-43 1 (2): 51.Google Scholar
Brušák, Karel. 1942. “Poetry prevails.” Cited from Berger, Walter, and Pavel Tigrid. 1943a. “The Czech Poetry of Faith and Hope.” Review-43 1 (1): 28–32.Google Scholar
Brunner, Lorenz. 1943. “Literature in the Third Reich.” Review-43 1 (1): 37–40.Google Scholar
Čapek, Karel. 1942. “Řeč a literature. [In praise of the Czech language].” Translation V. Z. J. Pinkava. Obzor 2 (9–10): 1–2.Google Scholar
Černý, Rudolf. 1941. “Věda a národ. [Science and the nation].” Our translation. Kulturní zápisník 1 (4): 45–48.Google Scholar
Fischl, Viktor. 1941. “Se břehu na břeh. [From shore to shore].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (1): 1–2.Google Scholar
F. B. 1941. “Výbušná síla kultury. [Explosive force of culture].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (2): 3.Google Scholar
-ir- 1942. “Poslanie slovenskej knihy. [Mission of the Slovak Book].” Our translation. Obzor 2 (2): 18–19.Google Scholar
Kripner, Viktor. 1942. “Tři knihy. [Three Books].” Our translation. Obzor 2 (4): 8–9.Google Scholar
. 1943. “Opodál. [Aloof].” Our translation. Obzor 3 (2): 2.Google Scholar
Lavrin, Janko. 1943. “Some Notes on Slavonic Romanticism.” Review-43 1 (2): 83–88.Google Scholar
Mucha, Jiří. 1941. “Hlasy země. [The voices of the country].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (2): 4.Google Scholar
Smetáček, Zdeněk. 1945. “Comment.” Review-45 2 (3–4): 97–99.Google Scholar
Sova, Antonín. 1941. “Za Antonínem Dvořákem. [To Antonín Dvořák].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (5–6): 9.Google Scholar
Synek, Kornel. 1941. “Suchá ratolesť? [Dry sprig?].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Š. K. 1941. “O soudobé anglické filosofii. [About contemporary English philosophy].” Our translation. Obzor 1 (8): 10.Google Scholar
Tigrid, Pavel. 1942a. “O knihách a časopisech. [About books and magazines, our translation].” Our translation. Kulturní zápisník 2 (4–5): 147–152.Google Scholar
. 1942b. “O knihách a časopisech. [About books and magazines].” Kulturní zápisník 2 (9–10): 25–28.Google Scholar
. 1943. “Bridge between East and West.” Review-43 1 (3): 112–117.Google Scholar
Tschuppik, Walter. 1942. “Goethe a Hitler. [Goethe and Hitler].” Our translation. Obzor 2 (1): 3–4.Google Scholar
Urzidil, Jan. 1942. Goethe a Čechové. [Goethe and Czechs].” Our translation. Obzor 2 (3): 13.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Dağdelen, Mazlum Kemal & Nico Carpentier
2024. The Discursive Construction of Childhood in Three Turkish Children’s Books about the Cyprus Problem. International Research in Children's Literature 17:2 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo
Lobo, Gregory Joseph
2021. National construction and popular erasure in Colombia. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 607 ff. DOI logo
Pasitselska, Olga & Christian Baden
2020. Who are ‘the people’?. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4 ► pp. 666 ff. DOI logo
Carpentier, Nico & David Grondin
2018. Étirer les frontières des études sur les communications et les médias. Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique :23 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Carpentier, Nico & David Grondin
2018. Stretching the Frontiers of Communication and Media Studies. Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique :23 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.