Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:1 (2019) ► pp. 107–130

Public administration in transition

Studying understandings and legitimations amongst middle managers within a government agency

| Goteborgs Universitet
This article focuses on how common-sense knowledge is enacted by middle managers in order to make sense of contemporary public administration. Specifically, the article demonstrates how managerialization and market logics is embedded in actors’ perceptions of public administration and becomes manifested through understandings and legitimations. The article presents an analysis of conversational data from middle management positions within a Swedish government agency. The analysis demonstrates how actors categorize a traditional hierarchy together with contemporary ideas of consumerism. It is also demonstrated how actors draw on legitimations of authority and mythopoesis in order to make sense of and to understand their managerial role within the agency. As such, the article contributes to contemporary public administration literature and its discussion regarding the effects of embedding marketization logics on actor and organizational levels as well as to ethnomethodologically informed literature within the social science and humanities.
Keywords: marketization, public administration, Membership Categorization Analysis, sense making, legitimation, mythopoesis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Managerialization, understandings and legitimations
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Empirical analysis
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 04 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17070.kar
References
Almqvist, Roland M.
2001 “’Management by contract’: a study of programmatic and technological aspects.” Public Administration – an international quarterly 79 (3): 689–706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnaboldi, Michela, Irvine Lapsley, and Ileana Steccolini
2015 “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” Financial Accountability & Management 31 (1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Gwen
2013 “Street-level policy entrepreneurship.” Public Management Review 17 (3): 307–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carolyn D.
1984 “The “search for adultness”: Membership work in Adolescent-adult talk.” Human Studies 7 (1): 301–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk.” In Culture and text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies, edited by Alison Lee and Cate Poynton, 99–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barbour, Rosaline S.
2001 [1999] “Are focus groups an appropriate tool for studying organizational change?” In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by Rosaline S. Barbour and Jenny Kitzinger, 114–127. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckman
1967 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Stanley Pullberg
1966 “Reification and the Sociologial Critique of Consciousness.” The New Left Review 35 (1): 56–71.Google Scholar
Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Laura Bloomberg
2014 “Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1966 Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method: Univ of California Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Sónia, Teresa Carvalho, and Rui Santiago
2011 “From Students to Consumers: reflections on the marketisation of Portuguese higher education.” European Journal of Education 46 (2): 271–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Tom, Amund Lie, and Per Lægreid
2008 “Beyond new public management: agencification and regulatory reform in Norway.” Financial Accountability & Management 24 (1): 15–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, John, Sharon Gewirtz, and Eugene McLaughlin
eds. 2000a New Managerialism, New Welfare? London: Sage.Google Scholar
2000b “Reinventing the Welfare State.” In New Managerialism, New Welfare?, edited by John Clarke, Sharon Gewirtz and Eugene, 1–26. McLaughlin. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clarke, John, and Janet Newman
1997 The managerial state: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Deem, Rosemary
1998 “’New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deem, Rosemary, and Kevin J. Brehony
2005 “Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (2): 217–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denhardt, Janet V., and Robert B. Denhardt
2015 “The New Public Service Revisited.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 664–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Elaine
2017 “Risk definition and the struggle for legitimation: a case study of Bt cotton in Andhra Pradesh, India.” Journal of Risk Research 20 (1): 135–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doolin, Bill
2001 “Doctors as managers: New Public Management in a New Zealand hospital.” Public Management Review 3 (2): 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry
1991 Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eglin, Peter, and Stephen Hester
2003 The Montreal masscre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1993 “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Language in social life series. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical discourse analysis.” In Discourses as a Social Interaction, edited by TA Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fountain, Jane E.
2001 “Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service.” Governance 14 (1): 55–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederickson, George H.
1999 “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” Political Science and Politics 32 (4): 701–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Sharon, and Stephen Ball
2000 “From ‘Welfarism’ to ‘New Managerialism’: Shifting discourses of school headship in the education marketplace.” Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education 21 (3): 253–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenngård, Anna H.
2016 “Experiences of Introducing a Quasi-Market in Swedish Primary Care: Fulfilment of Overall Objectives and Assessment of Provider Activities.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 20 (1): 71–86.Google Scholar
Gore, Albert
1993 From red tape to results: Creating a governmet that works better and costs less, report from the National Performance Review. Washington: US Government.Google Scholar
1994 Creating a government that works better & costs less. Summit, N.J.: Silicon Press.Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
eds. 1997 Culture in Action: Studies in membership categorization analysis, Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Washington: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Holmgren Caicedo, Mikael, Maria Mårtensson, and Kristina Tamm Hallström
2017 “The development of the management accountant’s role revisited: An example from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.” Financial Accountability & Management. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher
1991 “A public management for all seasons?” Public Administration 6 (3): 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “The ”new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3): 93–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric, and public management: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, and Ruth Dixon
2015 A government that worked better and cost less? : evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyndman, Noel, and Irvine Lapsley
2016 “New public management: The story continues.” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (4): 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaboolian, Linda
1998 “The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate.” Public Administration Review 58 (3): 189–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Tom S.
2014 Manager and Civil Servant: Exploring actors’ taken-for-granted assumptions in public administration. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
2017a New Public Management: Ett nyliberalt 90-talsfenomen? Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
2017b “Shaping NPM: Social Democratic Values at Work.” In Modernizing the Public Sector: Scandinavian Perspectives, edited by Irvine Lapsley and Hans Knutsson, 37–52. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2019 “Searching for managerial discretion: How public managers engage managerialism as a rationalization for increased latitude of action.” Public Management Review 21 (3): 315–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenoy, Tom, Cliff Oswick, and David Grant
1997 “Organizational discourses: Text and context.” Organization 4 (2): 147–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 308–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapsley, Irvine, and Peter Skærbæk
2012 “Why the Public Sector Matters.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (4): 355–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, Julian
1991 “Quasi-Markets and Social Policy.” The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1256–1267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Kathleen
2006 “Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education.” European educational research journal 5 (1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackerron, Gordon, and Frans Berkhout
2009 “Learning to listen: institutional change and legitimation in UK radioactive waste policy.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (7–8): 989–1008. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markóva, Ivana, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, and Anne Salazar Orvig
2007 Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde
2005 “The entrepreneurial university. A discursive profile of a higher education buzzword.” Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 95–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Language and the market society: Critical reflections on discourse and dominance: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Megginson, William L., and Jeffry M. Netter
2001 “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2): 321–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Brinton H., Keith G. Provan, and Barbara A. Else
1993 “What does the ”Hollow State” look like?” In Public Management: The state of the art, edited by Barry Bozeman, 309–322. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Modell, Sven
2004 “Performance Measurement Myths In The Public Sector: A Research Note.” Financial Accountability & Management 20 (1): 39–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modell, Sven, and Fredrika Wiesel
2008 “Marketization and Performance Measurement in Swedish Central Government: A Comparative Institutionalist Study.” Abacus 44 (3): 251–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, David L.
1996 “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 221:129–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler
1992 Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spririt Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Osborne, Stephen
2010 “Delivering Public Services: Time for a new Theory?” Public Management Review 12 (1): 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, Sotirios, Max Mckeown, and Simon Collinson
2013 “Building castles from sand: Unlocking CEO mythopoetical behaviour in Hewlett Packard from 1978 to 2005.” Business History 55 (7): 1200–1227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, Gert
2012 “The Role of Management Accountants in New Public Management.” Financial Accountability & Management 28 (4): 378–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher
1993 Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s? 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2016 “Managerialism redux?” Financial Accountability & Management 32 (4): 429–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, and Sorin Dan
2011 The impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A meta-analysis. COCOPS work package 1, Delivarable 1.1.Google Scholar
Power, Michael
1997 The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Rod A. W.
1994 “The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain.” The Political Quarterly 65 (2): 138–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1972a “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by D. N. Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1972b “On the analyzability of stories by children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited by J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 325–345. New York: Hold, Rineheart and Winston.Google Scholar
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Vol. 21, Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 “A tutorial on membership categorization.” Journal of Pragmatics 391:462–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth
2009 “Doing Actions with Identity Categories: Complaints and Denials in Neighbor Disputes.” Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 29 (1): 75–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women.” Discourse & Society 21 (1): 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Moving forward with membership Categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 277–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, Roy, and Royston Greenwood
2005 “Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.” Administrative science quarterly 50 (1): 35–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uttley, Matthew
1993 “Contracting-Out and Market-Testing in the UK Defence Sector: Theory, Evidence and Issues.” Public Money & Management 13 (1): 55–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waring, Justin, and Simon Bishop
2013 “McDonaldization or Commercial Re-stratification: Corporatization and the multimodal organisation of English doctors.” Social Science & Medicine 82 (0): 147–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. R.
1978 “Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation.” Sociology 12 (1): 105–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max
1978 Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Vol. 11: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue
2006 [1997] “Focus Group Reseach (sic!).” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by David Silverman, 177–199. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
Wynen, Jan, and Koen Verhoest
2013 “Do NPM-Type Reforms Lead to a Cultural Revolution Within Public Sector Organizations?” Public Management Review 17 (3): 356–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, Lynne G.
1977 “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” American Sociological Review 42 (5): 726–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 83–107. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Miron, and Kathleen C. Gerbasi
1977 “Dimensions of the I-E Scale and Their Relationship To other Personality Measures.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 371:159–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Fred, Mats
2020. Local government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective. Local Government Studies 46:3 ► pp. 351 ff. Crossref logo
Funck, Elin K. & Tom S. Karlsson
2020. Twenty‐five years of studying new public management in public administration: Accomplishments and limitations. Financial Accountability & Management 36:4 ► pp. 347 ff. Crossref logo
Sjögren, Maria
2021. Balancing the ideals of public participation. Journal of Language and Politics 20:2 ► pp. 304 ff. Crossref logo
Williamson, Sue, Lisa Carson & Meraiah Foley
2019. Representations of New Public Management in Australian Public Service gender equality policies. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 39:2 ► pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.