Conflicts and their discursive representations involve, apart from the spacio-temporal dimension, also the
socio-ideological and axiological positions. These prompt the desired emotional response from the audience in a form of
authorization for the intended action. All these dimensions are mainly construed by presenting series of assertions by creating
the dichotomy self-other and by triggering implicatures that contribute to the preferred interpretations of the presented
representations. This paper aims to examine the role of quotes and historical analogies triggered by quotes in discourse,
concretely, it focuses on the way the Ukrainian conflict is proximized in the US and the Czech political discourse, namely in the
parliamentary debates and governmental statements (November 2013–December 2014). The theoretical framework applied is the
proximization approach (Cap 2008, 2010,
2013, 2014, 2017) which is complemented by the studies that explore the pragmatic functions of quoting in
discourse.
2017 “Fake News. Warum wir auf sie reinfallen. Oder: ‘Ich mach euch die Welt so wie mir gefällt’” Der Sprachdienst 17 (1):1–20.
Bednarek, Monika
2006 “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text and Talk 26 (6): 635–660.
Bell, Allan
1991The language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boyd-Barrett, Oliver
2017 “Ukraine, Mainstream Media and Conflict Propaganda.” Journalism Studies 18 (8):1016–1034.
Bublitz, Wolfram
2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiguitous Meta-communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bublitz, Wolfram, and Christian Hoffmann
2011 “ ‘Three Men Using our Toilet all Day Withour Flushing – This May be the Worst Sentences I’ve Ever Read’: Quoting CMC.” In Anglistentag Saarbrücken 2010. Proceedings, edited by Joachim Frenk and Lena Steveker, 433–477. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Cap, Piotr
ed.2005Pragmatics Today. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Cap, Piotr
2006Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Cap, Piotr
2008 “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1):17–41.
Cap, Piotr
2010 “Axiological Aspects of Proximization”. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2): 392–407.
2014 “Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 701: 16–30.
2017The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul
2014Language, Space and Mind. The Conceptual Geomentry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chilton, Paul
2017 “Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump.” Langage et societé 2017/2 (160–161): 237–249.
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerring
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 764–805.
2016 “Does Russian Propaganda Work?” The Washington Quarterly 39 (2):79–98.
Haran, Oleksiy, and Petro Burkovskiy
2017 “Ukraine’s Foreign Policy and the Role of the West.” In Eastern Voices. Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West, edited by Daniel S. Hamilton and Stefen Meister, 51–76. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.
Kopytowska, Monika
2015a “Covering Conflict: Between Universality and Cultural Specificity in News Discourse, Genre and Journalistic Styles.” International Review of Pragmatics 71: 309–339.
Kopytowska, Monika
2015b “Mediating Identity, Ideology and Values in the Public Sphere: Towards a New Model of (Constructed) Social Reality.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 11 (2): 133–156.
Kopytowska, Monika, and Lukasz Grabowski
2017 “European security under threat: mediating the crisis and constructing the other.” In National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis: Doing and Undoing Europe, edited by Christian Karner and Monika Kopytowska, 83–108. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
Landert, Daniela
2015 “Reportable Facts and a Personal Touch: The Functions of Direct Quotes in Online News.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 29–52. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
2002 “The pragmatics of conducive questions in academic disourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 509–227.
Reyes, Antonio
2011Voice in Political Discourse. Castro, Chávez, Bush and their Strategic Use of Language. London/New York: Continuum.
Rock, Stephen R.
2000Appeasement in International Politics. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
Sakwa, Richard
2015Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris.
Severinson Eklundh, Kerstin
2010 “To Quote or not to Quote: Setting the Context for Computer-Mediated Dialogues.” Language@Internet 71 (article 5).
Stenwall, Maija
2008 “On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity -Tool for analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (9):1569–1586.
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
1987 “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Scheams in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2):206–216.
Tesař, Jan
2014Mnichovský komplex. Jeho příčiny a důsledky. Praha: Prostor.
Tulmets, Elsa
2018 “The West, the East and the Rest”. The Foreign Politicy orientations of Central Eastern European Countries.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 295–306. London/New York: Routledge.
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019 “Epistemic Stancetaking and Speaker Objectificaton in a Spatio-Cognitive Discourse World.” Journal of Language and Politics Available at [URL]
Webber, Mark
2017 “NATO Enlargement an the Post-Communist.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 346–357. London/New York: Routledge.
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
2008 “Proximisation, Common Ground and Assertion-Based Patterns for Legitimisation in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 2 (1): 31–48.
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
2013Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Wilson, Andrew
2014Ukraine Crisis. What it means for the West. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Wilson, Andrew
2018 “Explaining Ukraine.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 39–52. London/New York: Routledge.
Zaorálek, Lubomír
2014Crisis around Ukraine. In Otázky Václava Moravce [Questions of Václav Moravec], edited by Václav Moravec. Website of Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs: [URL]: Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Cited by (5)
Cited by 5 other publications
Hu, Chajuan
2023. A corpus-based study on the cognitive construction of security in discourse. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Hu, Chajuan
2024. Modeling the audience’s perception of security in media discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1
Salamurović, Aleksandra
2023. The Metonymy EUrope as a Means of Legitimizing Nations in the Western Balkans. In Konzepte der NATION im europäischen Kontext im 21. Jahrhundert [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 219 ff.
Ye, Hong & Kexin Chen
2023. A study on the discourse strategy of telecommunication fraud based on proximization theory. Discourse & Communication 17:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Li, Ke & Xiaonan Gong
2022. Proximization: a critical cognitive analysis of health security discourse. Text & Talk 42:5 ► pp. 713 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.