Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:6 (2019) ► pp.870–892

Constructing threat through quotes and historical analogies in the Czech and the US “Ukraine Discourse”

ORCID logo | Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Conflicts and their discursive representations involve, apart from the spacio-temporal dimension, also the socio-ideological and axiological positions. These prompt the desired emotional response from the audience in a form of authorization for the intended action. All these dimensions are mainly construed by presenting series of assertions by creating the dichotomy self-other and by triggering implicatures that contribute to the preferred interpretations of the presented representations. This paper aims to examine the role of quotes and historical analogies triggered by quotes in discourse, concretely, it focuses on the way the Ukrainian conflict is proximized in the US and the Czech political discourse, namely in the parliamentary debates and governmental statements (November 2013–December 2014). The theoretical framework applied is the proximization approach (Cap 2008, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2017) which is complemented by the studies that explore the pragmatic functions of quoting in discourse.
Keywords: Ukraine conflict, proximization, quotes, historical analogies, Czech, English, parliamentary debates, governmental statements
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Political background of the Ukraine Conflict (2013–2014)
  • 3.Theoretical background
    • 3.1Proximization theory
    • 3.2Proximization theory, historical analogies and quotes
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Research questions
    • 4.2Method and text corpus
    • 4.3Analytical findings
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18002.ber
References
Antos, Gerd
2017 “Fake News. Warum wir auf sie reinfallen. Oder: ‘Ich mach euch die Welt so wie mir gefällt’” Der Sprachdienst 17 (1):1–20.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006 “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text and Talk 26 (6): 635–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1991 The language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boyd-Barrett, Oliver
2017 “Ukraine, Mainstream Media and Conflict Propaganda.” Journalism Studies 18 (8):1016–1034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiguitous Meta-communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, and Christian Hoffmann
2011 “ ‘Three Men Using our Toilet all Day Withour Flushing – This May be the Worst Sentences I’ve Ever Read’: Quoting CMC.” In Anglistentag Saarbrücken 2010. Proceedings, edited by Joachim Frenk and Lena Steveker, 433–477. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr
ed. 2005 Pragmatics Today. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006 Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1):17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Axiological Aspects of Proximization”. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (2): 392–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Applying cognitive pragmatics to Critical Discourse Studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 701: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Crossing Symbolic Distanes in Politcal Discourse Space.” Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3):313–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Language, Space and Mind. The Conceptual Geomentry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump.” Langage et societé 2017/2 (160–161): 237–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerring
1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, and Masako Fidler
2019 “More than Keywords: Discourse Prominence Analysis of the Russian Web Portal-Sputnik Czech Republic.” In Political discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe, edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurovič, 93–117. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Theodore P., and Jane Zavisca
2016 “Does Russian Propaganda Work?” The Washington Quarterly 39 (2):79–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haran, Oleksiy, and Petro Burkovskiy
2017 “Ukraine’s Foreign Policy and the Role of the West.” In Eastern Voices. Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West, edited by Daniel S. Hamilton and Stefen Meister, 51–76. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika
2015a “Covering Conflict: Between Universality and Cultural Specificity in News Discourse, Genre and Journalistic Styles.” International Review of Pragmatics 71: 309–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Mediating Identity, Ideology and Values in the Public Sphere: Towards a New Model of (Constructed) Social Reality.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 11 (2): 133–156.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika, and Lukasz Grabowski
2017 “European security under threat: mediating the crisis and constructing the other.” In National Identity and Europe in Times of Crisis: Doing and Undoing Europe, edited by Christian Karner and Monika Kopytowska, 83–108. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela
2015 “Reportable Facts and a Personal Touch: The Functions of Direct Quotes in Online News.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 29–52. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty
1949 Accessible at [URL]
Piazza, Roberta
2002 “The pragmatics of conducive questions in academic disourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 509–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 Voice in Political Discourse. Castro, Chávez, Bush and their Strategic Use of Language. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rock, Stephen R.
2000 Appeasement in International Politics. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Sakwa, Richard
2015 Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Severinson Eklundh, Kerstin
2010 “To Quote or not to Quote: Setting the Context for Computer-Mediated Dialogues.” Language@Internet 71 (article 5).Google Scholar
Stenwall, Maija
2008 “On emotions and the journalistic ideals of factuality and objectivity -Tool for analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (9):1569–1586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
1987 “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Scheams in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2):206–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tesař, Jan
2014 Mnichovský komplex. Jeho příčiny a důsledky. Praha: Prostor.Google Scholar
Tulmets, Elsa
2018 “The West, the East and the Rest”. The Foreign Politicy orientations of Central Eastern European Countries.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 295–306. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Stefanie
2019 “Epistemic Stancetaking and Speaker Objectificaton in a Spatio-Cognitive Discourse World.” Journal of Language and Politics Available at [URL]
Webber, Mark
2017 “NATO Enlargement an the Post-Communist.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 346–357. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
2008 “Proximisation, Common Ground and Assertion-Based Patterns for Legitimisation in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 2 (1): 31–48.Google Scholar
2013 Clusivity: A New Approach to Association and Dissociation in Political Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew
2014 Ukraine Crisis. What it means for the West. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
2018 “Explaining Ukraine.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics, edited by Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecký, 39–52. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zaorálek, Lubomír
2014 Crisis around Ukraine. In Otázky Václava Moravce [Questions of Václav Moravec], edited by Václav Moravec. Website of Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs: [URL]: Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Li, Ke & Xiaonan Gong
2022. Proximization: a critical cognitive analysis of health security discourse. Text & Talk 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.