Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:3 (2021) ► pp.451–473

Portrayal of power in manifestos

Investigating authority legitimation strategies of Pakistan’s political parties

ORCID logo | Air University Islamabad Pakistan
| Air University Islamabad Pakistan
Power, conforming to particular political groups of the society, is exercised on the masses by making them believe in the legitimacy of that dominance. This association enables the groups to exercise their power and promulgate their ideologies through their discourse as well. One illustration of this discourse appears in the form of political manifestos. Utilizing the tool of language, the political actors (as agents of political parties) set agendas, pertinent topics and position their stance in these manifestos. Framed under critical discourse analysis, the current study attempts to investigate this act of ‘legitimation’ promulgated by Chilton (2004) and the strategies of Authority Legitimation, devised by Van Leeuwen (2008). The article illustrates how the power-holders utilize their linguistic resources to authorize their stance, idea, and action. The study helps explicating the relation between power, ideology and language and promulgates consciousness regarding the reality constructed by humans, as social and political actors.
Keywords: politics, power, discourse, manifestos, ideology, legitimation strategies, Pakistan
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Pakistani political field
    • 1.2Politics and persuasion
    • 1.3Manifestos as political discourse
    • 1.4Legitimation in political discourse
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Personal authority in the Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.2Expert authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.3Role model authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.4Impersonal authority in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.5Authority of tradition in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.6Authority of conformity in Pakistani manifestos
    • 3.7Statistical calculations
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 16 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18009.far
References
Adeney, Katharine
2015 “A Move to Majoritarian Nationalism? Challenges of Representation in South Asia.” Representation 51(1): 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ali, Marwah K., Anne A. Christopher, and Munif Z. F. B. Nordin
2016 “Linguistic Legitimation of Political Events in Newspaper Discourse.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7(4): 76–83.Google Scholar
Al-Tahmazi, Thulfiqar H.
2015 “The pursuit of power in Iraqi political discourse: Unpacking the construction of sociopolitical communities on Facebook.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10(2): 163–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Awami National Party [ANP]
2013 “Elections Manifesto 2013.” Accessed October 22, 2017. [URL]
Bilal, Hafiz A., Hina M. Ahsan, Sundus Gohar, Sehreen Younis, and Saqib J. Awan
2012 “Critical discourse analysis of political TV talk shows of Pakistani media.” International Journal of Linguistics 4(1): 203–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
2001 Masculine domination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2011 “Variations on a theme: Party Manifesto discourses in the UK 2010 Election.” Language and Representation 9(9): 9–30.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul Anthony
2004 Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2006 Narrating the Political Self. Language in Society 35(4): 467–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2): 193–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Language in New Capitalism. Discourse & Society 13(2): 163–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1972 Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of the Clinical Gaze. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Gamson, William
2001 “Promoting political engagement.” In Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, edited by W. Lance Bennett & Robert M. Entman, 56–75. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, Sten
2017 “Anticipative strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(2): 219–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakimnia, Roya, Inger K. Holmstron, Marianne Carlsson, and Anna T. Hoglund
2014 “Exploring the communication between telenurse and caller: A critical discourse analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 9(1): 242–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hussain, Sajid, A. R. Sajid, and Shafiq Jullandhry
2018 “Politics-media-youth nexus: Analysis of Pakistan’s general elections 2013.” Cogent Social Sciences 4(1): 2–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Matthew
2007 “Legitimization and the discursive reproduction of social domination: Case study of British political discourse and the Israeli occupation of Palestine.” Athenea Digital 111: 34–55.Google Scholar
Martínez-Mesa, Jeovany, David Alejandro González-Chica, Rodrigo Pereira Duquia, Renan Rangel Bonamigo, and Joao Luiz Bastos
2016 “Sampling: how to select participants in my research study?” Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 91(3): 326–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfiqar Ali
2019 “Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media + Society 5(4): 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., Silvia M. Mendes
2001 “The policy space of party manifestos.” In Estimating the policy position of political actors, edited by Michael Laver, 90–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Memon, Nazish, Faraz Ali Bughio, and Illahi Bux Gopang
2014 “Critical Analysis of Political Discourse: A Study of Benazir Bhutto’s Last Speech.” Balochistan Journal of Linguistics 21: 79–95.Google Scholar
Miller, David, Janet Coleman, William Connolly and Alan Ryan
1991 The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Motion, Judy
2005 Participative public relations: Power to the people or legitimacy for government discourse? Public Relations Review 31(4): 505–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Heraldo
2013 Getting away with murder: Benazir Bhutto’s assassination and the politics of Pakistan. London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Muttahida Qaumi Movement [MQM]
2013 “Empowering People: 2013 Manifesto.” Accessed October 10, 2017. [URL]
Nadeem, Ushna, Muhammad Asim Mahmood, & Rashid Mahmood
2014 “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Election Manifestos of Pakistani Political Parties.” Public Policy and Administration Research 4(11): 1–10.Google Scholar
Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz [PMLN]
2013 “National Agenda for Real Change: Manifesto 2013”. Accessed November 20, 2017. [URL]
Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarians [PPPP]
2013 “2013 Manifesto.” Accessed November 21, 2017. [URL]
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf [PTI]
2013 “ PTI Manifesto Election 2013 .” Accessed October 25, 2017. [URL]
Pitcher, Ben
2006 “ ‘Are you thinking what we’re thinking?’ Immigration, multiculturalism and the disavowal of racism in the run-up to the 2005 British General Election.” Social Semiotics 16(4): 535–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Paul
2001 How to Win an Election: The Art of Political Campaigning. London: Politico’s publishing.Google Scholar
Richardson, John E., Michał Krzyżanowski, David Machin and Ruth Wodak
2016 Advances in critical discourse studies. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rye, Danny
2014 “Political Parties and Power: A New Framework for Analysis.” Political Studies 63(5): 1052–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, Bahador, Mohammad Taghi Hassani, and Vahid Jalali
2014 “Towards (de-) legitimation discursive strategies in news coverage of Egyptian protest: VOA & Fars news in focus.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 981: 1580–1589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarvat, Humaira
2015 “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s Manifesto.” International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 4(2): 373–379.Google Scholar
Serfaty, Viviane
2010 “Web campaigns: popular culture and politics in the U.S. and French presidential elections.” Culture, Language and Representation 81: 115–129.Google Scholar
Shaikh, Nazra Zahid, Ruksana Tariq, and Najeeb-us-Saqlain
2016 “Cartoon War…A Political Dilemma! A Semiotic Analysis of Political Cartoons.” Journal of Media Studies 31(1): 74–92.Google Scholar
Taiwo, Rotimi
2008 “Legitimization and coercion in political discourse: A case study of olusegun obasanjo address to the PDP elders and stakeholders forum.” Issues in Political Discourse Analysis 2(2): 79–91.Google Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
2006 “Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring.” Organization Studies 27(6): 789–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Aims of critical discourse analysis.” Japanese Discourse 11: 17–27.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsham, Geoff
1993 Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
1996 Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar