Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp.251–269

Reconciliation as a political discourse in Thailand’s current conflicts

 | Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
ORCID logo | King Prajadhipok’s Institute, Thailand
Why do Thai governments fail in maintaining peace through conducting a reconciliation process? This article answers this question through an assessment of how the term reconciliation has been defined and used by the Thai governments and political leaders during the past decades. This article finds that the political conflicts in Thailand have never been solved because several times, reconciliation in the Thai language is a term that has been dynamically interpreted and applied by leaders of the conflicting groups as a means to defeat the people of the opposing groups rather that a means of resolving problems and reconciling society.
Keywords: reconciliation, discourse, political conflict, Thailand
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reconciliation in conflict transformation theories
  • 3.The definitions of reconciliation in the Thai language and context
  • 4.Reconciliation policies during the periods of Surayud, Samak, and Somchai: Finding the ways back to the Harmonious Thai society through conflict resolution and management methods
  • 5.Reconciliation policies during the periods of Abhisit and Yingluck: Applying the transitional justice ideas to reconcile the Thai society
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 31 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18054.tha
References (48)
References
“ขิงแก่” ฝ่อ! รับ “แม้ว” ทรงอิทธิพล-สมานฉันท์เหลว. 2007. Manager Online, March, 9. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
“สุรยุทธ์” ลั่น “ในชีวิตไม่เคยถอดใจ”- ยันนำพาชาติฝ่าพ้นวิกฤตให้ได้. 2007. Manager Online, January, 20. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
“Call to Amend Charter.” 2008. The Nation, 22 March, 1A.Google Scholar
“Charter is not a political toy.” 2008. Bangkok Post, 25 March, 101.Google Scholar
“Reuters Journalist Killed in Bangkok Protests.” 2010. Reuters, April 4. Retrieved 15-12-2016 from [URL]
Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2001. Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion: Toward a Training Model of Interreligious Peacebuilding. Journal of Peace Research 38(6), 685–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azar, Edward E. and John W. Burton. (eds.). 1986. International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine, and Kimana Zulueta-Fülscher. 2016. Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman. 2009. “Introduction: The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 1–11. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, David, and Ben Reilly. 1998. “The Changing Nature of Conflict and Conflict Management.” In Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited by Peter Harris and Ben Reilly, 9–28. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, David. 2003. “Reconciliation: an Introduction.” In Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: A Handbook, edited by Bloomfield, David, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 10–18. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Brounéus, Karen. 2003. Reconciliation: Theory and Practice for Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
Burton, John. 1990. Conflict: Resolution & Prevention. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Chairat Charoensin-o-larn. 2010. Thailand in 2009: Unusual Politics Becomes Usual. Southeast Asian Affairs: 302–331.Google Scholar
. 2013. Thailand in 2012: A Year of Truth, Reconciliation, and Continued Divide. Southeast Asian Affairs: 285–304.Google Scholar
Chaiyan Ratchakul. 2002. Conflicts in the Context of Peaceful Means. In Class Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 2). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 2011. “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice.” In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited by Beatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 406–430. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1976. “Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peacebuilding.” In Peace, War and Defense: Essays in Peace Research, Vol. II1, edited by Johan Galtung, 282–304. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.Google Scholar
. 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2001. “After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution: Coping with Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence.” In Reconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, edited by Mohammed Abu-Nimer, 3–24. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hewison, Kevin. 2014. Thailand: The Lessons of Protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia 50(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
. 2015. Thailand: Contestation over Elections, Sovereignty and Representation. Representation 50(1): 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Kai-Ping, and Stithorn Thananithichot. 2018. Social Divisions, Party Support, and the Changes in the Thai Party System since 2001. International Area Studies Review, 21(3): 214–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huyse, Luc. 1998. “Transitional Justice.” In Democracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited by Peter Harris and Ben Reilly, 273–280. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
King Prajadhipok’s Institute. 2012. The National Reconciliation Building. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. [in Thai]Google Scholar
Kriesberg, Louis. 2011. “The State of the Art in Conflict Transformation.” In Advancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited by Beatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 49–73. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
Lederach, John Paul. 1995. Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.Google Scholar
McClung, Margi, and Karina Kloos. 2016. Promoting Peace: Mitigating and Managing Intra-Household Property Rights Disputes in Rwanda. Seattle, WA: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Miall, Hugh. 2004. Conflict Transformation: A Multi-Dimensional Task. Berlin: Berghof Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
Nishizaki, Yoshinori. 2014. Peasants and the Redshirt Movement in Thailand: Some Dissenting Voice. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockey, James. 2009. Thailand in 2008: Democracy and Street Politics. Southeast Asian Affairs: 315–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Peg. 2000. How to Manage Conflict: Turn All Conflicts into Win-win Outcomes, 3rd edition. Franklin Lake, NJ: Career Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Oliver, and Wolfram Schaffar. 2008. The 2006 Anti-Thaksin Movement in Thailand: An Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38(1): 8–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosoux, Valerie. 2009. “Reconciliation as a Peace-Building Process: Scope and Limits.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 543–562. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rungtham Sujithammarak. 2002. Peace Studies and Peace. Class Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 1). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]Google Scholar
Shriver, Donald. W. 1995. An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spangler, Brad. 2003. “Settlement, Resolution, Management, and Transformation: An Explanation of Terms.” In Beyond Intractability, edited by Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Boulder, Colorado: Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Staub, Ervin. 2000. “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and Reconciliation.” Political Psychology 21(2): 367–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Carolyn M. 2008. “Peace Studies, Overview.” In Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict, Volume 2, edited by Lester Kurtz, 809–820. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suravich Weerawan. 2007. ตัวตนของพล.อ.สุรยุทธ์. Manager Online, March, 23. Retrieved 17-02-2017 from [URL]
Taylor, David. 2014. Victim Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms: Real Power or Empty Ritual? Discussion Paper. Impunity Watch, Utrecht.Google Scholar
“Thailand: Revolution in Red and Yellow.” 2009. The Guardian, April 14. Retrieved 11-12-2016 from [URL]
Thoms, Oskar N. T., James Ron and Roland Paris. 2008. The Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for Analysts and Practitioners. Ottawa: Centre for International Policy Studies, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
“The Week in Review.” 2006. Bangkok Post, October 1, 41.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Thailand. 2012. Final Report of Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand (TRCT) July 2010 – July 2012. Bangkok: Office of Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Thailand.Google Scholar
Weiner, Eugene. 1998. “Coexistence Work: A New Profession.” In The Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence, edited by Eugene Weiner, 13–26. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar