Missing the (Turning) point
The erosion of democracy at an American University
On August 25, 2017, student members of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a right-wing conservative organization who
advocates for smaller government and free market enterprise, recruited on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) campus. Members
of the UNL community protested nearby. Part of the protest was recorded on video and released to social media leading to harsh
public criticism that accused the university of restricting free speech and being an unsafe environment for conservative students.
Drawing on cognitive linguistics (e.g. metonymy, framing) and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), this paper explores
how the TPUSA incident at UNL was recontextualized in local and national media discourse, the ways in which the social actors and
events were framed, and its consequences. The authors show how these representations reinforce dominant neoliberal discourses
(which correlate with right-wing discourses) that negatively impact public education, providing a necessary counter to a populist
political climate in which anti-intellectualism reigns.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Getting to the (turning) point and other necessary context
- 3.Freedom of speech
- 4.Theoretical framework
- 5.Method
- 6.Findings
- 6.1Additions
- 6.2Deletion
- 6.3Substitution
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (33)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Elements of Semiology. London: Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, Basil. 2003. Class, Codes, and Control: Volume VI the Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Catalano, Theresa. 2016. Talking about Global Migration: Implications for Language Teaching. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Catalano, Theresa, and Linda R. Waugh. Forthcoming, 2019. Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric: Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Claussen, D. S. 2011. A brief history of anti-intellectualism in American media. Academe, 97(3), 8–13.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: OUP USA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kolowich, Steve. April 27, 2018. “State of Conflict: How a Tiny Protest at the U. of Nebraska Turned into a Proxy War for the Future of Campus Politics,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liptak, Adam. June 30, 2018. “How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment,” The New York Times. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2015. Metonymy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCausland, Phil, and Emmanuelle Saliba, E. August 12, 2017. “Charlottesville Rally Turns Deadly: One Killed After Car Strikes Crowd,” NBC News. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Messer-Davidow, Ellen. 1993. “Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education.” Social Text 361: 40–80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mindock, Clark. May 24, 2018. “Taking a Knee: Why are NFL Players Protesting and When Did They Start to Kneel?” The Independent. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
Saunders, Daniel B.. 2010. “Neoliberal Ideology and Public Higher Education in the United States.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 8 (1): 41–77.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tiede, Hans Joerg. 2017. “Exhuming McCarthy (Meet Me at the Book Burning)” Academe, 103 (5): 15–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
U.S. Const. Amend. I. Retrieved June 1, 2018 from: [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and Society, 6 (2): 243–289. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse- Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do, and Paul G. Renigar. 2016. “Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 71–135. New York: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Özbilgin, Mustafa F. & Cihat Erbil
2024.
How (Not) to Manage Intersectional Inclusion. In
Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Funk, Marcus & Burton Speakman
2022.
Centrist Language, Camouflaged Ideology: Assembled Text-Based Content on Mainstream and Ideological News Podcasts.
Journalism Studies 23:11
► pp. 1415 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.