Cover not available
Article published In:
The Politics of Sound: Intersections of Music, Discourse and Political Communication
Edited by Lyndon C.S. Way
[Journal of Language and Politics 18:4] 2019
► pp. 560–578

Neoliberal feminism in contemporary South Korean popular music

Discourse of resilience, politics of positive psychology, and female subjectivity

ORCID logo | Cheyney University of Pennsylvania
This paper examines how South Korean popular music (K-pop) promotes neoliberal feminism by a discourse of resilience. In a therapeutic narrative of overcoming obstacles and achieving goals, K-pop videos deliver a hegemonic message that individuals have to be responsible for their success and well-being rather than blaming external, institutional conditions. While ostensibly promoting female empowerment, the videos update and reinforce patriarchal gender norms and expectations. To substantiate this point, I analyze music videos of the most successful K-pop group, Girls’ Generation’s “Into the New World” (2007) and “All Night” (2017) to investigate how they promote resilience discourse along with neoliberal positive psychology as a hegemonic ideal of female subjectivity.
Keywords: K-pop female idols, neoliberal feminism, discourse of resilience, positive psychology, governmentality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Discourse, governmentality, and politics in popular music
  • 2.Discursive De-construction of K-pop Female idols’ success
  • 3.Celebrity: Discourse, pedagogy, and politics
  • 4.Neoliberal feminism: Resilience discourse and positive psychology
  • 5.“Into the new world”: Presenting resiliency as ideal femininity and key to success
  • 6.“All night”: How paid-off female resiliency would look like
  • 7.Conclusion: Feminism in K-pop as neoliberal exploitation of female aspirations
  • Notes
  • Reference
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18058.kim
References (75)
Reference
Adorno, Theodor W. 1975. “Culture industry reconsidered.” New German Critique 61(Autumn): 12–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. “Affective economies.” Social Text 22(2): 117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahn, Shin-Hyun. 2011. “Girls’ Generation and the New Korean Wave.” SERI Quarterly 4(4): 81–86.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Joanne. 2010. “Claiming volition and evading victimhood: Post-feminist obligations for young women.” Feminism & Psychology 20(2): 186–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2014. “Am I pretty or ugly? Girls and the market for self-esteem.” Girlhood Studies 7(1): 83–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bay-Cheng, Laina Y. 2015. “The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality.” Sex Roles 73(7–8): 279–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bethmann, Dirk, and Robert Rudolf. 2018. “Happily ever after? Intrahousehold bargaining and the distribution of utility within marriage.” Review of Economics of the Household 16(2): 347–376.Google Scholar
Binkley, Sam. 2011. “Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality.” Subjectivity 4(4): 371–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brassett, James, Stuart Croft, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2013. “Introduction: An agenda for resilience research in politics and international relations.” Politics 33(4): 221–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2003. “Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory & Event 7(1). [URL]. DOI logo
. 2006. “American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization.” Political Theory 34(6): 690–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Cabanas, Edgar, and Eva Illouz. 2017. “The making of a ‘happy worker’: Positive psychology in neoliberal organizations.” In Beyond the cubicle: Job insecurity, intimacy and the flexible self, edited by A. J. Pugh, 25–49. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Elaine. 2010. “The emotional life of governmental power.” Foucault Studies 91(September): 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canclini, Néstor García. 1995. Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, David. 2013. “International statebuilding and the ideology of resilience.” Politics 33(4): 276–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Aoust, Anne-Marie. 2014. “Ties that bind? Engaging emotions, governmentality and neoliberalism: Introduction to the special issue.” Global Society 28(3): 267–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William. 2015. The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Dawney, Leila. 2013. “The Interruption: Investigating Subjectivation and Affect.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31(4): 628–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Drake, Philip, and Andy Miah. 2010. “The cultural politics of celebrity.” Cultural Politics 6(1): 49–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffield, Mark. 2012. “Challenging environments: Danger, resilience and the aid industry.” Security Dialogue 43(5): 475–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah. 2013. “‘Leaning in’ in Iraq: Women’s rights and war?’” Al Jazeera, March 23. [URL]
Evans, Brad, and Julian Reid. 2013. “Dangerously exposed: The life and death of the resilient subject.” Resilience 1(2): 83–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1985. “Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 9(6): 739–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norma. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical discourse analysis.” In Discourse as a Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. “The political technology of individuals.” In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton, 145–161. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, edited by Gordon, G. and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frederickson, Barbara. 2009. Positivity: Groundbreaking research reveals how to embrace the hidden strength of positive emotions, overcome negativity, and thrive. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Anita. 2004. Future girl: Young women in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Robin. 2015. Resilience & melancholy: Pop music, feminism, neoliberalism. Alresford, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 2004. “Politics of utopia.” New Left Review 251(January): 35–56.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan. 2013. “Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: a governmentality approach.” Resilience 1(1): 38–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Gooyong. 2017. “K-pop Female Idols: Culture Industry, Neoliberal Social Policy, and Governmentality in Korea.” In Routledge Handbook of Global Cultural Policy, edited by Victoria Durrer, Toby Miller, and Dave O’Brien, 520–537. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “K-pop Female Idols as Cultural Genre of Patriarchal Neoliberalism: A Gendered Nature of Developmentalism and the Structure of Feeling/Experience in Contemporary Korea.” Telos 1841(Fall): 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1995. Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
2012. “Multimedia and discourse analysis.” In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, edited by Gee, James Paul, and Michael Handford, 79–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lentzos, Filippa, and Nikolas Rose. 2009. “Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection, resilience.” Economy and Society 38(2): 230–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Lisa A. 1990. Gender politics and MTV: Voicing the difference. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Xi, and Robert Rudolf. 2017. “Does K-pop Reinforce Gender Inequalities? Empirical Evidence from a New Data Set.” Asian Women 33(4): 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, P. David. 1997. Celebrity and Power: Fame in Contemporary Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “The promotion and presentation of the self: celebrity as marker of presentational media.” Celebrity Studies 1(1): 35–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McRobbie, Angela. 2013. “Feminism, the family and the new ‘mediated’ maternalism.” New Formations 801(Winter): 119–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2018. “Gender Equality.” [URL]. DOI logo
O’Halloran, Kay. 2004. “Visual semiosis in film.” In Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Systemic Functional Perspectives, edited by Kay O’Halloran, 109–130. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Malley, Pat. 2010. “Resilient subjects: Uncertainty, warfare and liberalism.” Economy and Society 39(4): 488–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pelinka, Anton. 2007. “Language as a political category: The viewpoint of political science.” Journal of Language & Politics 6(1): 129–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reivich, Karen, and Andrew Shatte. 2002. The resilience factor: 7 keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life’s hurdles. Chicago: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Rimke, Heidi Marie. 2000. “Governing citizens through self-help literature.” Cultural Studies 14(1): 61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojek, Chris. 2001. Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1993. “Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism.” Economy and Society 22(3): 283–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999a. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
. 1999b. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rottenberg, Catherine. 2014. “The rise of neoliberal feminism.” Cultural studies 28(3): 418–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Neoliberal Feminism and the Future of Human Capital.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42(2): 329–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Sheryl. 2013. Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin. 2004. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: ATRIA Paperback.Google Scholar
. 2012. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin, Peter Railton, Roy F. Baumeister, and Chandra Sripada. 2016. Homo prospectus. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, Martin, and John Tierney. 2017. “We aren’t built to live in the moment.” The New York Times, May 19. [URL]
Shouse, Eric. 2005. “Feeling, emotion, affect.” M/C Journal 8(6). [URL]. DOI logo
Stringer, Rebecca. 2014. Knowing victims: Feminism, agency and victim politics in neoliberal times. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Sabine. 2009. “A systemic functional framework for the analysis of corporate television advertisements.” In The World Told and the World Shown, edited by Ventola, E. and Guijarro, A. J. M., 157–182. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1990. “ Discourse & Society: A new journal for a new research focus.” Discourse & Society 1(1): 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & Society 4(2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vrasti, Wanda. 2011. “‘Caring’ Capitalism and the Duplicity of Critique.” Theory & Event 14(4). [URL]. DOI logo
Walker, Jeremy, and Melinda Cooper. 2011. “Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation.” Security Dialogue 42(2): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh-Dilley, Marygold, and Wendy Wolford. 2015. “(Un) Defining resilience: subjective understandings of ‘resilience’ from the field.” Resilience 3(3): 173–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zebrowski, Chris. 2013. “The nature of resilience.” Resilience 1(3): 159–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

McDonald, Matthew, Lan Thi Nguyen, Thao Thi Thu Nguyen, Nhu Quynh Tran‐Kieu & Hien Thi‐Thu Do
2024. Globalising positivity discourses and women. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 18:1 DOI logo
Sun, Qingyue, Dacia Paje’ & Hyunmin Lee
2023. “Female empowerment is being commercialized”: online reception of girl crush trend among feminist K-pop fans. Feminist Media Studies 23:8 ► pp. 4156 ff. DOI logo
Yoong, Melissa
2020. Neoliberal Feminism, Postfeminism and Professional Identities in the Media. In Professional Discourses, Gender and Identity in Women's Media, ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Gooyong
2019. From Hybridity of Cultural Production to Hyperreality of Post-feminism in K-pop: A Theoretical Reconsideration for Critical Approaches to Cultural Assemblages in Neoliberal Culture Industry. European Journal of Korean Studies ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.