Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp.325–344

Langue de bois, or, discourse in defense of an offshore financial center

ORCID logo | Thomas Jefferson University

This article brings together trends in Critical Discourse Analysis dating from the 1980s – which examine how language use and ideologies (re)produce social inequality – with current research in the social sciences on neoliberalism and other emerging politico-economic formations. The article addresses such a problematic with an empirical case: the language strategies, dubbed langue de bois, that people affiliated with Luxembourg’s offshore financial center employ to justify their practices. The contribution herein surveys the political rationality of the country’s financial center by analyzing the langue de bois that its representatives and boosters use. These language strategies, furthermore, enable Luxembourg’s finance elites to socialize the domestic public’s understanding of their activities.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, elites, political economy, offshore finance, Luxembourg
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical approach
  • 3.Data collection
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1 Langue de bois No. 1 – competitiveness
    • 4.2 Langue de bois No. 2 – transparency
    • 4.3 Langue de bois No. 3 – metonymy
    • 4.4 Langue de bois No. 4 – jealousy
    • 4.5 Langue de bois No. 5 – level playing field
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18072.wee
References
Birchall, Claire
2011 “The Politics of Opacity and Openness: Introduction to ‘Transparency.’” Theory, Culture & Society 14 (1): 77–88.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Chris Bulcaen
2000 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 291: 447–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Yves
2016 “Un milliard d’euros de dommages [A Billion Euros in Damages].” Luxemburger Wort, November 22.Google Scholar
Caregari, Luc
2016 “Le contradicteurs [The Detractors].” Woxx, January 15.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fabri, David, and Godfrey Baldacchino
1999 “The Malta Financial Services Centre: A Study in Micro-State Dependency Management?” In Offshore Finance Centres and Tax Havens: The Rise of Global Capital, ed. by Jason P. Abbott and Mark P. Hampton, 140–165. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fassone, Marc
2015a “Certificat de conformité : la note du Luxembourg relevée à « largement conforme » par le Forum mondial [Certificate of Conformity: Luxembourg’s Grade Is Revealed to ‘Largely Conform’ by the World Forum].” Le Jeudi, November 5–11.Google Scholar
2015b “Transparence fiscale : un long chemin encore tortueux [Fiscal Transparency: A Long and Still-Tortuous Path].” Le Jeudi, December 24–30.Google Scholar
2016a “Du bon usage des sociétés offshore : le point sur l’utilisation de ces sociétés sur la Place [Proper Usage of Offshore Companies: The Point of Using These Companies in the Financial Center].” Le Jeudi, April 7–13.Google Scholar
2016b “Entre la harmonisation et renoncement : comment la fiscalité luxembourgeoise s’est adaptée aux nouveaux règlements [Between Harmonization and Renunciation: How Luxembourgish Tax Policy Adapted to New Regulations].” Le Jeudi, April 14–20.Google Scholar
2016c “La légalité ne suffit pas : le scandale vu par la CSSF [Legality Is Not Enough: The Scandal Viewed by the CSSF].” Le Jeudi, April 14–20.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1969 L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan
1989 “Language and Political Economy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 181: 345–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, Philip W.
2002 “Hypercapitalism: Language, New Media and Social Perceptions of Value. Discourse & Society 13 (2): 227–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haag, Emile
2015 The Rise of Luxembourg: From Independence to Success. Luxembourg: Editions Saint-Paul.Google Scholar
Harrington, Brooke
2016 Capital Without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David
2005 A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2013 “Discourses and Concepts: Interfaces and Synergies between Begriffsgeschichte and the Discourse-Historical Approach in CDA.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, 201–214. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2014 “Values, Imaginaries and Templates of Journalistic Practice: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics 24 (3): 345–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 308–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “ ‘We Are a Small Country That Has Done Enormously Lot’: The ‘Refugee Crisis’ and the Hybrid Discourse of Politicizing Immigration in Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16 (1/2): 97–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
(ed) 1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde
2008 “Analyzing Newspapers, Magazines and Other Print Media.” In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski, 30–53. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyse, Laurent, Claude Meiers, and Michel Maquil
2014 The Architects of Luxembourg’s Financial Industry: Testimonies on the Origin and Development of the Financial Centre in Luxembourg. Luxembourg: Editions Saint-Paul.Google Scholar
Obermayer, Bastian, and Frederik Obermaier
2016 The Panama Papers: Breaking the Story of How the Rich and Powerful Hide Their Money. London: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Ötsch, Silke
2016 “The Offshore Coalition, Its Tactics and Strategies.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (3): 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palan, Ronen
2006 The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places, and Nomad Millionaires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen, Richard Murphy, and Christian Chavagneux
2009 Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Phelan, Sean
2007 “The Discursive Dynamics of Neo-Liberal Consensus: Irish Broadsheet Editorials and the Privatization of Eircom.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinçon, Michel, and Monique Pinçon-Charlot
2015 Tentative d’évasion (fiscale). Paris: Editions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Shaxson, Nicholas
2012 Les paradis fiscaux : Enquête sur les ravages de la finance néolibérale. Brussels: André Versaille.Google Scholar
Thomas, Bernard
2016a “Les mousquetaires du Freeport [The Musketeers of the Freeport].” D’Lëtzebuerger Land, April 29.Google Scholar
2016b “Strange Fruit.” D’Lëtzebuerger Land, April 8.Google Scholar
2016c “Unique Selling Position.” D’Lëtzebuerger Land, March 4.Google Scholar
2017 “Level Playing Field.” D’Lëtzebuerger Land, November 13.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Owen
2017 “Luxembourg Expects More Companies to Leave Over Tax Scrutiny.” Financial Times, February 5.Google Scholar
Weeks, Samuel
2018 “Secrecy and Consensus: The Governmentality of an Offshore Financial Center in Europe.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California-Los Angeles.Google Scholar
2020a “A Freeport Comes to Luxembourg, or, Why Those Wishing to Hide Assets Purchase Fine Art.” Arts 9 (3): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b “Offshore Ontologies: Global Capital as Substance, Simulation, and the Supernatural.” Dialectical Anthropology 44 (4): 355–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Collective Effort, Private Accumulation: Constructing the Luxembourg Investment Fund, 1956–2019,” in Accumulating Capital Today: Contemporary Strategies of Profit and Dispossessive Policies, ed. by Marlène Benquet and Théo Bourgeron, 89–103. Oxford: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
(ed) 1989 Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Mediation Between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 179–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “ ‘Anything Goes!’ – The Haiderization of Europe.” In Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Britgitte Mral, 23–38. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2015 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Jean
1979 Switzerland: The Awful Truth. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar