Article published in:Media, Migration and Human Rights: Discourse and Resistance in the Context of the Erosion of Liberal Norms
Edited by Ekaterina Balabanova and Ruxandra Trandafoiu
[Journal of Language and Politics 19:3] 2020
► pp. 498–517
Freedoms and limitations in the twitter communications of the United Kingdom’s all party parliamentary group on refugees
The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees occupies a position outside the official legislative system of the United Kingdom, but inside a lobbying network. This gives it a unique place in terms of communicating on behalf of refugees and refugee causes. The Group’s Twitter feed shows that its language is different to that of campaigning organisations outside Parliament and is constrained by procedure, parliamentary practice and the political reality of a party-based environment. Aimed at Parliamentarians, the feed is used to support and promote causes and specific policy proposals. It plays a role in reporting what is going on in Parliament and supports and builds alliances with other organisations inside and outside the system. The feed’s content follows the primary information-providing objective. It could however make that information of more use to recipients, by changing the way in which some of that information is presented.
Keywords: Twitter, Parliament, refugees, lobbying, United Kingdom, MPs
Published online: 03 April 2020
All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees
2017 “Refugees Welcome? The Experience of New Refugees in the UK.” https://naccom.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/APPG_on_Refugees_-_Refugees_Welcome_report.pdf
Cebrián Guinovart, Elena, Tamara Vásquez Barrio and David Saria Rodríguez
2016 “Is Twitter Invigorating Spanish Democracy? A Study of Political Interaction through the Accounts of The Prime Minister and The Leader of the Main Opposition Party”. In Citizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital World, edited by Frame, Alex and Gilles Brachotte, 60–80, London: Routledge.
Di Fraia, Guido, and Maria Carlotta Missaglia
Einspänner-Pflock, Jessica, Mario Anastasiadis and Caja Thimm
2014 “Corporate funding of all party groups ‘next big scandal’ after huge rise under the coalition.” The Independent, 18 May. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corporate-funding-of-all-party-groups-next-big-scandal-after-huge-rise-under-the-coalition-9391286.html
House of Commons Hansard
House of Commons Speaker’s Working Group on All-Party Groups
2012 “Report to the Speaker and Lord Speaker.” https://www.parliament.uk/documents/speaker/Speakers-Working-Group-on-APGs-report.pdf
Houses of Parliament
House of Commons Committee on Standards
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
. n.d. “About Us” Accessed 18 September 2018 https://www.jcwi.org.uk
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina, and Louise Thompson
McLaren, Lauren, Hajo Boomgaarden, and Rens Vliegenthart
Moon, Jung Soo, and Patrick Hadley
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards
2017 “Guide to the Rules on All Party Parliamentary Groups.” https://www.parliament.uk/documents/pcfs/all-party-groups/guide-to-rules/guide.html#_idTextAnchor000
. n.d. “www.refugeecouncil.org.uk
Searing, Donald D.
Small, Tamara A.
Thomas, Paul E. J.
Thomas, Paul E. J., and Stacey Frier
Walgrave, Stefaan and Yves Dejaeghere
White, Alison J.
2018 APPG Letter, Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists. http://registrarofconsultantlobbyists.org.uk/guidance/specialist-guidance/all-party-parliamentary-groups/