Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp. 197–225

The Twittering Presidents

An analysis of tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump

| Curtin University
| Curtin University
| University of Liverpool
| Curtin University
This paper uses a Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA) approach to analyse tweets from the Twitter accounts of Presidents Barack Obama (@Barack Obama) and Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump). The tweets were posted during the last nine months of President Obama’s effective presidency and the first nine months of President Trump’s presidency. The tweets are analysed using automated text analysis which is interpreted through an SF-MDA lens, supplemented by manual analysis. The analysis examines ideational and interpersonal emphasis in the tweets with the aim of showing how the composition and content construct a view of how each president and his presidency are presented to the public. The findings suggest marked contrasts in presidential style with President Trump foregrounding the interpersonal while President Obama foregrounds the ideational. Where President Trump presents as self-promoting, autocratic, opinionated and igniting discord in his tweets, President Obama presents as democratic, moderate, restrained and seeking social harmony.
Keywords: multimodal discourse analysis, social media, US politics, Twitter, systemic functional linguistics
Published online: 18 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19046.wig
References

References

Auxier, Brooke, and Jennifer Golbeck
2017 “The President on Twitter: A Characterization Study of at realDonaldTrump.” In International Conference on Social Informatics, 377–390. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barberá, Pablo, and Thomas Zeitzoff
2018 “The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?” International Studies Quarterly 62(1): 121–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A.
2014a “Looking for What Counts in Film Analysis: A Programme of Empirical Research.” In Visual Communication, ed. by David Machin, 301–329. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve
2019 “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PloS ONE 14(9): e0222062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Bethany A., Kate Kenski, and Di Wang
2015 “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20(4): 363–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn
2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32(1): 50–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn, and Anja Aaheim Naper
2016 “Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 US Presidential Election Campaign.” In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 364–378. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, Justin H., and Kaylee T. Johnson
2016 “Twitter Taunts and Tirades: Negative Campaigning in the Age of Trump.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 748–754. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1978 Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2008 Complementarities in Language. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
ed. 2014 The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Josephus Johannes Bezemer, and Kay L. O’Halloran
2016 Introducing Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas
2016 “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 72–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona
2017 “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker
2018 “Re/constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourses, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
2001 Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim
2016 “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review 42 (5): 849–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu
2018 “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review 44(2): 201–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992 English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2007 Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L.
ed. 2004 Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 “Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis SF-MDA: Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery.” Visual Communication 7: 443–475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., and Victor Lim Fei
2014 “Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In Texts, Images and Interactions: A Reader in Multimodality, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Carmen D. Maier, 137–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, and Peter Wignell
2019 “SFL and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. by Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine, and David Schönthal. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, Michael
2011 The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd edition. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L.
2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Sarah
2017 “Twitter Officially Expands its Character Count to 280 Starting Today. Accessed January 22, 2019. https://​techcrunch​.com​/2017​/11​/07​/twitter​-officially​-expands​-its​-character​-count​-to​-280​-starting​-today/
Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell
2020 “ ‘Going Negative’: An Appraisal Analysis of the Rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication 70: 13–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society 4 (2): 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D.
2007 Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. by Terry D. Royce, and Wendy Bowcher, 63–110. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron
2009 The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
Sorato, Danielly, and Renato Fileto
2019 “Linguistic Pattern Mining for Data Analysis in Microblog Texts Using Word Embeddings.” In Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier
2018 “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35: 50–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolee, Galen, and Steve Caton
2018 “Twitter, Trump, and The Base: A Shift to a New Form of Presidential Talk?.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tasente, Tanase
2020 “Twitter Discourse Analysis of US President Donald Trump.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 2 (1): 67–75. https://​techniumscience​.com​/index​.php​/socialsciences​/article​/view​/49
Trevisan, Piergiorgio
2018 “ ‘Tweeting Engagement’. Strategies of Identity Construction and ‘Alignment-Disalignment’ in Donald Trump’s Use of Social Media.” Lingue e Linguaggi 28: 337–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trump Twitter Archive
Accessed January 22, 2019. http://​www​.trumptwitterarchive​.com​/archive
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2005 Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012 “The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 9: 319–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice
2015 “Twitter and Political Campaigning.” Sociology Compass 9 (9): 745–760. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Anneliese, Caroline Carvill, Richard House, Jessica Livingston, and Julia M. Williams
2017 “Trump Typhoon: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Donald’s Twitter Feed.” In 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 1–7. IEEE. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kevin Chai, Sabine Tan, Kay O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange
2018 “Natural Language Understanding and Multimodal Discourse Analysis for Interpreting Extremist Communications and the Re-Use of these Materials Online.” Terrorism and Political Violence. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kay O’Halloran, and Sabine Tan
2019 “Semiotic Space Invasion: The Case of Donald Trump’s US Presidential Campaign.” Semiotica 226: 185–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yini, Chris Wells, Song Wang, and Karl Rohe
2018 “Attention and Amplification in the Hybrid Media System: The Composition and Activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter Following during the 2016 Presidential Election.” New Media & Society 20(9): 3161–3182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar