Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp.197–225

The Twittering Presidents

An analysis of tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump

 | Curtin University
 | Curtin University
 | University of Liverpool
 | Curtin University
This paper uses a Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA) approach to analyse tweets from the Twitter accounts of Presidents Barack Obama (@Barack Obama) and Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump). The tweets were posted during the last nine months of President Obama’s effective presidency and the first nine months of President Trump’s presidency. The tweets are analysed using automated text analysis which is interpreted through an SF-MDA lens, supplemented by manual analysis. The analysis examines ideational and interpersonal emphasis in the tweets with the aim of showing how the composition and content construct a view of how each president and his presidency are presented to the public. The findings suggest marked contrasts in presidential style with President Trump foregrounding the interpersonal while President Obama foregrounds the ideational. Where President Trump presents as self-promoting, autocratic, opinionated and igniting discord in his tweets, President Obama presents as democratic, moderate, restrained and seeking social harmony.
Keywords: multimodal discourse analysis, social media, US politics, Twitter, systemic functional linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature Review
  • 3.Analysis of tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump: A multimodal perspective
  • 4.Theoretical model, data and method
    • 4.1Theoretical model
    • 4.2Data
    • 4.3Method
  • 5.Findings and Discussion
    • 5.1Automated analyses
      • Categories
      • Keywords
      • Sentiment
      • Emotion
    • 5.2Manual Analyses
      • First person pronouns
      • Attitude
    • 5.3Multimodal tweets
  • 6.Summary and findings
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19046.wig
References (50)
References
Auxier, Brooke, and Jennifer Golbeck. 2017. “The President on Twitter: A Characterization Study of@ realDonaldTrump.” In International Conference on Social Informatics, 377–390. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberá, Pablo, and Thomas Zeitzoff. 2018. “The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?” International Studies Quarterly 62(1): 121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A. 2014a. “Looking for What Counts in Film Analysis: A Programme of Empirical Research.” In Visual Communication, ed. by David Machin, 301–329. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve. 2019. “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PloS ONE 14(9): e0222062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway, Bethany A., Kate Kenski, and Di Wang. 2015. “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20(4): 363–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn. 2017. “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 32(1): 50–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enli, Gunn, and Anja Aaheim Naper. 2016. “Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 US Presidential Election Campaign.” In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 364–378. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, Justin H., and Kaylee T. Johnson. 2016. “Twitter Taunts and Tirades: Negative Campaigning in the Age of Trump.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (4): 748–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2008. Complementarities in Language. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, ed. 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Josephus Johannes Bezemer, and Kay L. O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 72–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona. 2017. “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2018. “Re/constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourses, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim. 2016. “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review 42 (5): 849–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu. 2018. “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review 44(2): 201–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., ed. 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008. “Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis SF-MDA: Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery.” Visual Communication 71: 443–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., and Victor Lim Fei. 2014. “Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In Texts, Images and Interactions: A Reader in Multimodality, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Carmen D. Maier, 137–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, and Peter Wignell. 2019. “SFL and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. by Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine, and David Schönthal. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, Michael. 2011. The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd edition. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ott, Brian L. 2017. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perez, Sarah. 2017. “Twitter Officially Expands its Character Count to 280 Starting Today. Accessed January 22, 2019. [URL]
Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell. 2020. “‘Going Negative’: An Appraisal Analysis of the Rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication 701: 13–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers. 2018. “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society 4 (2): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D. 2007. Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. by Terry D. Royce, and Wendy Bowcher, 63–110. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, Aaron. 2009. The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
Sorato, Danielly, and Renato Fileto. 2019. “Linguistic Pattern Mining for Data Analysis in Microblog Texts Using Word Embeddings.” In Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 351: 50–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolee, Galen, and Steve Caton. 2018. “Twitter, Trump, and The Base: A Shift to a New Form of Presidential Talk?.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tasente, Tanase. 2020. “Twitter Discourse Analysis of US President Donald Trump.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 2 (1): 67–75. [URL]
Trevisan, Piergiorgio. 2018. “‘Tweeting Engagement’. Strategies of Identity Construction and ‘Alignment-Disalignment’ in Donald Trump’s Use of Social Media.” Lingue e Linguaggi 281: 337–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trump Twitter Archive. Accessed January 22, 2019. [URL]
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2012. “The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 91: 319–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice. 2015. “Twitter and Political Campaigning.” Sociology Compass 9 (9): 745–760. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Anneliese, Caroline Carvill, Richard House, Jessica Livingston, and Julia M. Williams. 2017. “Trump Typhoon: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Donald’s Twitter Feed.” In 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 1–7. IEEE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kevin Chai, Sabine Tan, Kay O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange. 2018. “Natural Language Understanding and Multimodal Discourse Analysis for Interpreting Extremist Communications and the Re-Use of these Materials Online.” Terrorism and Political Violence. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter, Kay O’Halloran, and Sabine Tan. 2019. “Semiotic Space Invasion: The Case of Donald Trump’s US Presidential Campaign.” Semiotica 2261: 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yini, Chris Wells, Song Wang, and Karl Rohe. 2018. “Attention and Amplification in the Hybrid Media System: The Composition and Activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter Following during the 2016 Presidential Election.” New Media & Society 20(9): 3161–3182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Karjus, Andres & Christine Cuskley
2024. Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Baranowski, Paweł & Paulina Matera
2023. Words that Matter: Donald Trump’s Twitter Communication in the Pre-COVID-19 Period. Polish Political Science Review 11:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Bugs, Geisa Tamara, Agnes Silva de Araujo, Diego Saez-Trumper & Rodrigo Firmino
2023. Mapping Political Extremism on Twitter in Brazil. In Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14107], ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Hansson, Sten & Ruth Page
2023. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies 20:4 ► pp. 361 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Haeder, Simon F. & Jacqueline Chattopadhyay
2022. The Power of a Tweet? Social Media, Presidential Communication, and the Politics of Health. Presidential Studies Quarterly 52:2 ► pp. 436 ff. DOI logo
Jaber, Fadi
2022. Social media framing of the 2022 ‘War in Ukraine’: A content analysis study of the Canadian prime minister’s tweets. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.