Why do politicians cite others in political debates?
A functional analysis of reported speech in a Japanese political debate
Politicians often quote opponents in political debates so as to highlight contradictions between the opponents’ prior statements and their current political actions, thus construing their political character negatively. From a dialogic perspective, reported speech, alternatively termed “extra-vocalisation”, can be defined as a tool used by speakers to deny alternative points of view and justify their own positions, while simultaneously positioning the audience in agreement with the speaker’s own views. Drawing on this notion of extra-vocalisation, the current study analyses a Japanese political debate to show how politicians use different types of voice to validate their own political ideologies and devalue opposing views. In doing so, the study also identifies the relevant linguistic resources of Japanese in order to show how dialogic positioning via extra-vocalisation is manifested in Japanese, and highlight the fact each language provides its own resources to convey such meanings.
Keywords: political discourse, extra-vocalisation, reported speech, dialogic positioning, Japanese language
Published online: 15 January 2020
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar
Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser
Benoit, William Lyon
Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita, and Peter Bull
2015 “ Affiliating in crisis: a linguistic perspective on community formation on Twitter after the nuclear accident in Japan in 2011 .” PhD diss., The University of Technology, Sydney.
Leech, Geoffrey Neil, and Mick Short
Maynard, Senko K.
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
Suto, Kinuko and Christopher Barnard
Van Dijk, Teun A.
White, Peter Robert
1998 “ Telling Media Tales .” PhD diss., The University of Sydney.
2016 “ Nexus of Language and Culture: A Study of Second Person Reference Terms in Japanese with Special Focus on Anata ‘You’ .” PhD diss., Australian National University.