Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp.604–623

Why do politicians cite others in political debates?

A functional analysis of reported speech in a Japanese political debate

ORCID logo | The University of Sydney

Politicians often quote opponents in political debates so as to highlight contradictions between the opponents’ prior statements and their current political actions, thus construing their political character negatively. From a dialogic perspective, reported speech, alternatively termed “extra-vocalisation”, can be defined as a tool used by speakers to deny alternative points of view and justify their own positions, while simultaneously positioning the audience in agreement with the speaker’s own views. Drawing on this notion of extra-vocalisation, the current study analyses a Japanese political debate to show how politicians use different types of voice to validate their own political ideologies and devalue opposing views. In doing so, the study also identifies the relevant linguistic resources of Japanese in order to show how dialogic positioning via extra-vocalisation is manifested in Japanese, and highlight the fact each language provides its own resources to convey such meanings.

Keywords: political discourse, extra-vocalisation, reported speech, dialogic positioning, Japanese language
Article outline
  • 1.Political discourse analysis
  • 2.Dialogic positioning via extra-vocalisation
  • 3.Data and background of the debate
  • 4.Justifying one’s own political stance via extra-vocalisation
    • 4.1The citizens’ voice
    • 4.2The aligned parties’ voice
    • 4.3The professionals’ voice
  • 5.Rejecting opposing points of view via extra-vocalisation
    • 5.1The opponents’ voice
    • 5.2The heavyweight speaker voice: The Prime Minister
      • 5.2.1Prime Minister’s voice: Criticism via adversative structure
      • 5.2.2Prime Minister’s voice: Criticism via attitudinal grammatical resources
    • 5.3Citizens’ voice: Criticism of Japanese view
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 15 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19061.shi
References
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar
2001 “Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.” Text 21 (4): 467–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser
2003 “A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates.” Communication Monographs 701: 335–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William Lyon
2014 Political Election Debates: Informing Voters about Policy and Character. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard Gerrig
1990 “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language 661: 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
2015a “Policy-Oriented Argumentation or Ironic Evaluation: A Study of Verbal Quoting and Positioning in Austrian Politicians’ Parliamentary Debate Contributions.” Discourse Studies 17 (6): 682–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Establishing Intertextual References in Austrian Parliamentary Debates. A Pilot Study”. In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains, edited by Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer, 15–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan
2007 “From beliefs to arguments: interpretative methodology and rhetorical political analysis.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (4): 545–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita, and Peter Bull
2015 “Culture or communicative conflict? The analysis of equivocation in broadcast Japanese political interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 341: 65–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1999 “Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge.” Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inako, Ayumi
2015 “ Affiliating in crisis: a linguistic perspective on community formation on Twitter after the nuclear accident in Japan in 2011 .” PhD diss., The University of Technology, Sydney.
Isshiki, Maiko
2011 “nihongo no hojodooshi ‘-te shimau’ no bunpooka: shukanka, kanshukanka o chuushin ni [Japanese grammaticalisation of an auxiliary verb, te shimaui: Focusing on subjectivity and intersubjectivity].” Nihonkenkyuu 151: 201–221.Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua
2001 “Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey Neil, and Mick Short
1981 Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo
1975 A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Tokyo: Tuttle Language Library.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
1994 “Images of involvement and integrity: Rhetorical style of a Japanese politician.” Discourse and Society 5(2): 233–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Danwa bunseki no kanoosee – riron, hoohoo, nihongo no hyoogensee [Discourse analysis: theory, method and Japanese expressivity]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publisher.Google Scholar
1999 ‘‘Grammar, with attitude: On the expressivity of certain da sentences in Japanese.’’ Linguistics 37 (2): 215–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibata, Masaki
2018 “Why is Toru Hashimoto called “a Japanese version of Trump” or “Hitler”?: Linguistic examination of the Hashimoto’s attack on his opponents.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 19 (1): 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto-Smith, Janet S.
(2011) “Honorifics, ‘politeness’ and power in Japanese political debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3707–3791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunagawa, Yuriko
1988 “Inyoobun ni okeru ba no nijuusee nit suite [the duality of place in citation].” Nihongogaku 7 (9): 14–29.Google Scholar
Suto, Kinuko and Christopher Barnard
2013 “Nominalisation and nouniness as meaning strategies in Japanese political manifestos.” In Systemic Functional Perspectives of Japanese: Descriptions and Applications, edited. by Elizabeth A. Thomson, and William S. Armour, 173–209. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
1996 “Voices in the Text: discourse perspectives on language Reports”. Applied Linguistics 171: 501–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998 “What is political discourse analysis?” In Political linguistics, edited by Blommaert, Jan and Chris Bulcaen, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
White, Peter Robert
1998 “ Telling Media Tales .” PhD diss., The University of Sydney.
Wodak, Ruth
2009a The discourse of politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2009b “Language and politics” In English language: Description, variation and context, edited by Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, Anthony McEnery, and Francis Katamba, 576–593. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yonezawa, Yoko
2016 “ Nexus of Language and Culture: A Study of Second Person Reference Terms in Japanese with Special Focus on Anata ‘You’ .” PhD diss., Australian National University.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Rubio-Carbonero, Gema & Núria Franco-Guillén
2021. When in parliamentary debate there is no debate. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo
Shibata, Masaki
2021. Reported Speech as Persuasion: A Discourse Analysis of Japanese Journalism. Japanese Studies 41:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.