Review published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp. 256362
Berens, Sam C., Jessica S. Horst, and Chris M. Bird
2018 ‘Cross-Situational Learning Is Supported by Propose-but-Verify Hypothesis Testing’. Current Biology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin, and Nancy Chang
2005 ‘Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding’. In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 147–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Frank
2013 ‘Cognitive Construction Grammar’. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited by Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, 176–88. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London; New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H., and Nick Chater
2016 ‘The Now-or-Never Bottleneck: A Fundamental Constraint on Language’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 ‘Towards an Integrated Science of Language’. Nature Human Behaviour 1 (8): 1–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Constantinescu, A. O., J. X. OReilly, and T. E. J. Behrens
2016 ‘Organizing Conceptual Knowledge in Humans with a Gridlike Code’. Science 352 (6292): 1464–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2016 ‘Cognitive Linguistics’ Seven Deadly Sins’. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feldman, Jerome, Ellen Dodge, and John Bryant
2015 ‘Embodied Construction Grammar’. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, edited by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 2nd ed., 111–38. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
2009 ‘Frames and Constructions: Putting Them Together’. presented at the Frames and Constructions, Berkeley, CA. http://​www​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/icsi​/node​/4388
2014 ‘Frames, Constructions, and FrameNet’. In Constructions Collocations Patterns, edited by Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 121–66. Berlin; Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2010 ‘Beyond the Sentence: Constructions, Frames and Spoken Interaction’. Constructions and Frames 2 (2): 185–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
1986 ‘Book Review: Paul Werth: Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis’. Journal of Semantics, no. 51: 79–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna
2007Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2019Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
ed. 2011Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 2014Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London; New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hasson, Uri, Giovanna Egidi, Marco Marelli, and Roel M. Willems
2018 ‘Grounding the Neurobiology of Language in First Principles: The Necessity of Non-Language-Centric Explanations for Language Comprehension’. Cognition 1801: 135–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, Gregory, and Steven Lawrence Small
eds. 2016Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul
2004 ‘Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions’. In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence R. Horn and Gergory Ward, 675–700. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, David
2014Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. New York, NY: Psychology Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Sydney M.
1999Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Matthew D., D. Schreiber, and K. N. Ochsner
2003 ‘Is Political Cognition like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking’. Political Psychology 24 (4): 681–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lilleker, Darren G.
2014Political Communication and Cognition. London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran
2003Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, Friedemann
2013 ‘How Neurons Make Meaning: Brain Mechanisms for Embodied and Abstract-Symbolic Semantics’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (9): 458–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle, and Yury Shtyrov
2013 ‘Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar’. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited by Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., and Patrick Sturt
2002 ‘Depth of Processing in Language Comprehension: Not Noticing the Evidence’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (9): 382–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staresina, Bernhard
2018, Thomas 2018, Reber, Johannes Niediek, Jan Boström, Christian E. Elger, and Florian Mormann 2019 ‘Recollection in the Human Hippocampal-Entorhinal Cell Circuitry’. Nature Communications 10 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steels, Luc
2012Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 ‘Fluid Construction Grammar’. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited by Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017 ‘Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar’. Constructions and Frames 9 (2): 178–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Peter
2002Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014 ‘Atmosphere and Tone’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Peter Stockwell and Sarah Whitely, 360–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trijp, Remi van
2017 ‘A Computational Construction Grammar for English’. Technical SS-17-02. The AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding.
Van Eecke, Paul, and Katrien Beuls
2018 ‘Exploring the Creative Potential of Computational Construction Grammar’. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik 66 (3): 341–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werth, Paul
1984Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Westen, Drew
2008The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar