Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 20:2 (2021) ► pp. 304–324

Balancing the ideals of public participation

Discursive legitimation strategies of a disputed practice

| University of Gothenburg
Local authorities in western societies increasingly initiate public participation processes despite criticism of these methods. To understand this development calls for in-depth studies of how the goals and values of public participation are articulated in practice. This paper analyzes the discursive legitimation strategies deployed by civil servants in twelve planning meetings for a participatory process aimed at mitigating violence in a Swedish suburb. The study draws on previous research on discursive legitimation, and presents the context-specific strategies of authorization, de-legitimation, cosmology and addressing of values. The analysis highlights that a core discursive tension in this practice arises from its need to seek mandate in the municipal structure, while the value discourses used to legitimize public participation build on a break from traditional bureaucracy. The study contributes to the broader literature on discursive legitimation in contemporary political contexts, with detailed empirical accounts of how a disputed practice is legitimized in interaction.
Keywords: public participation, citizen participation, critical discourse studies, legitimation, social practice, local governance, planning meetings
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Participation as a disputed practice
  • 2.Discourse and legitimation
    • 2.1Analytical framework
    • 2.2Previous research on discursive legitimation
  • 3.Material and method
    • 3.1The case study
    • 3.2Data
    • 3.3Method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Authorization
    • 4.2De-legitimation (distancing to previous processes)
    • 4.3Cosmology
    • 4.4Addressing of values
  • 5.Summary and discussion
    • 5.1Balancing participatory ideals at the local level
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19098.sjo
References
Aggerholm, Helle Kryger, and Birte Asmuß
2016 “A Practice Perspective on Strategic Communication: The Discursive Legitimization of Managerial Decisions.” Journal of Communication Management 20 (3): 195–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg
2018 Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Los Angeles (CA): Sage.Google Scholar
Amnå, Erik
2006 “Playing with Fire? Swedish Mobilization for Participatory Democracy.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (4): 587–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Rob, Leslie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna
2004 Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
2014 “ ‘They Became Big in the Shadow of the Crisis’. The Greek Success Story and the Rise of the Far Right.” Discourse & Society 25 (4): 540–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbalet, Jack M.
2001 Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeler, Carmen
2010 “Organizational Regimes of Emotional Conduct.” In Emotionalizing Organizations and Organizing Emotions ed by. Barbara Sieben, Åsa Wettergren. 272–292. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L., Thomas Luckmann, Thomas
1967 The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
Black, Laura W.
2015 “Dialogue”. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy. 264–371. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bornemark, Jonna
2016 Medborgardialog – om det svåra i att mötas: Praktikers reflektioner om ett av demokratins viktigaste verktyg. Stockholm: Arkus.Google Scholar
Breit, Eric
2014 “Remedy through Paradox? Constructions of Internal Legitimacy in a Publicly Discredited Organization.” Management Communication Quarterly 28 (4): 585–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruning, Stephen D., Melissa Dials, and Amanda Shirka
2008 “Using Dialogue to Build Organization–Public Relationships, Engage Publics, and Positively Affect Organizational Outcomes.” Public Relations Review 34 (1): 25–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren
2018 “Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. by André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. 1–31: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, Nico
2014 “Participation as a Fantasy: A Psychoanalytical Approach to Power-Sharing Fantasies.” In Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe, ed. by Leif Kramp, Nico Carpentier, Andreas Hepp. 319–330, Bremen: Edition lumière.Google Scholar
Codó, Eva
2011 “Regimenting discourse, controlling bodies: Disinformation, evaluation and moral categorization in a state bureaucratic agency.” Discourse & society 22 (6):723–742. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, Andrea
2004 “Introduction: New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation.” iDS Bulletin 35 (2): 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dybel, Pawel
2015 “Rational Dialogue or Emotional Agon? Habermas’s Concept of the Public Sphere and Mouffe’s Project of Radical Democracy.” In Democracy in Dialogue, Dialogue in Democracy: The Politics of Dialogue in Theory and Practice, ed. by Katarzyna Jezierska and Leszek Koczanowicz, 95–112, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Erkama, Niina, and Eero Vaara
2010 “Struggles over Legitimacy in Global Organizational Restructuring: A Rhetorical Perspective on Legitimation Strategies and Dynamics in a Shutdown Case.” Organization Studies 31 (7): 813–839. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and social change. Vol. 101. Cambridge: Polity pressGoogle Scholar
2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Kerrie R. H.
2013 “Citizen (in) Action: The Limits of Civic Discourse in City Council Meetings.” Critical Discourse Studies 10 (1): 81–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro, and Maria João Ferreira
2015 “Through ‘Seas Never Before Sailed’: Portuguese Government Discursive Legitimation Strategies in a Context of Financial Crisis.” Discourse & Society 26 (6): 682–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon
2015 “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., and John S. Dryzek
2006 “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics.” Politics & Society 34 (2): 219–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hellquist, Alexander, and Martin Westin
2019 Medborgardialog om konfliktfyllda samhällsfrågor: konsensus, agonism eller mobilisering? Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.Google Scholar
Irvin, Renee A., and John Stansbury
2004 “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen
2005 Max Weber: Readings and Commentary on Modernity. Malden: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Tom
2019 “Public Administration in Transition: Studying Understandings and Legitimations amongst Middle Managers within a Government Agency.” Journal of Language and Politics 18 (1): 107–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karppinen, Kari, Hallvard Moe, and Jakob Svensson
2008 “Habermas, Mouffe and Political Communication: A Case for Theoretical Eclecticism.” Javnost – The Public 15 (3): 5–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranert, Michael
2018 “Political Myth as a Legitimation Strategy.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 882–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: LangGoogle Scholar
Michels, Ank, and Laurens De Graaf
2017 “Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited.” Local Government Studies 43(6):875–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
2017 “Discursive Double-Legitimation of (Avoiding) Another War in Obama’s 2013 Address on Syria.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5): 706–730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moisander, Johanna K., Heidi Hirsto, and Kathryn M. Fahy
2016 “Emotions in Institutional Work: A Discursive Perspective.” Organization Studies 37 (7): 963–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole
2012 “Participatory Democracy Revisited.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (01): 7–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Luisa Martin, and Teun A. Van Dijk
1997 “ ‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8 (4): 523–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Stefan Slembrouck
1996 Language, bureaucracy and social control. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Silverman, David
2015 Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
SOU 2000:1
2000 En uthållig demokrati!: Politik för folkstyrelse på 2000-talet: Demokratiutredningens betänkande. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
SOU 2016:5
2016 Låt fler forma framtiden!: Betänkande. Stockholm: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Suddaby, Roy, and Royston Greenwood
2005 “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 35–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, Jakob
2008 ”Kommunikation, medborgarskap och deltagardemokrati : en studie av medborgarutskotten i Helsingborg”. PhD. Diss. Lund: Sociologiska institutionenGoogle Scholar
Tahvilzadeh, Nazem
2015 “Understanding Participatory Governance Arrangements in Urban Politics: Idealist and Cynical Perspectives on the Politics of Citizen Dialogues in Göteborg, Sweden.” Urban Research & Practice 8 (2): 238–254.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2010 Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent. Vol. 11. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
2006 “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies 27 (6): 789–813. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero
2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society 25 (4): 500–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Discourse as the Recontextualization of Social Practice: A Guide.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 137–153. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiberg, Sofia
2018 ”Lyssnandets praktik: Medborgardialog, icke-vetande och förskjutningar”. PhD diss. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael, Meyer
2016 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE.Google Scholar