Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:5 (2020) ► pp.831856
References (60)
Anthony, Laurence
2016AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL]
Anthony, Laurence, and Hardaker, Claire
2019FireAnt (Version 1.1.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Wasada University. [URL]
Asch, Solomon E.
1956 “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70 (9): 1–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1951 “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment.” In Groups, Leadership and Men, edited by Harold Guetzkow, 177–190. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
Baronett, Stan
2008Logic. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi and Ross, Andrew S.
2020 “Trumpian Tweets and Populist Politics: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analytical Study.” In Populist Discourse across Modes and Media, edited by Ruth Breeze and Ana M. Fernández-Vallejo, 21–38. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blake, Aaron
2017 “Kellyanne Conway says Donald Trump’s Team Has ‘Alternative Facts’. Which Pretty Much Says It All.”: The Washington Post, January 23 2017 [URL]
Blankenship, Christina M.
2019 “President, Wrestler, Spectacle: An Examination of Donald Trump’s Firing Tweets and the Celebrity Appresident as Response to Trump’s Media Landscape.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 44 (2): 117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, Elena, and Negrine, Ralph
(2017) “The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework.” International Journal of Communication 111: 178–197.Google Scholar
Burroughs, Benjamin
2013 “Obama Trolling: Memes, Salutes and an Agonistic Politics in the 2012 Presidential Election.” The Fibreculture Journal 221: 257–276.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2008 “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choma, Becky L., and Hanoch, Yaniv
2016Cognitive Ability and Authoritarianism: Understanding Support for Trump and Clinton.” Personality and Individual Differences 1061: 287–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William E.
2017 “Trump, the Working Class, and Fascist Rhetoric.” Theory & Event 20 (1): 23–37.Google Scholar
Davies, Julie H., and Tackett, Michael
2019 “Trump and Democrats Dig in After Talks to Reopen Government Go Nowhere.” The New York Times, January 2 2019 [URL]
Degani, Marta
2016 “Endangered Intellect: A Case Study of Clinton vs. Trump Campaign Discourse.” Iperstoria – Testi Letterature Linguaggi 81: 131–145.Google Scholar
Dinan, Stephen
2018 “Support for Trump Border Wall Sets Record, Focus on Impeachment Plummets: Poll.” The Washington Times, January 18 2018 [URL]
Enli, Gunn
2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication 321: 50–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2002 “Critical and Descriptive Goals in Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Michael Toolan, 321–345. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Francesconi, Robert A.
1982 “James Hunt, the Wilmington 10, and Institutional Legitimacy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1): 47–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jean
2011Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts. Argumentation 25 (3): 285–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis F.
1996Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harsin, Jayson
2015 “Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics and Attention Economies.” Communication, Culture & Critique 8 (2): 327–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie R.
2016 “The Ecstatic Edge of Politics: Sociology and Donald Trump.” Contemporary Sociology 45 (6): 683–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iraq Survey Group
2004 “Iraq Survey Group Final Report.” [URL]
Jamieson, Kathleen H., and Taussig, Doron
2017 “Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump.” Political Science Quarterly 132 (4): 619–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahane, Howard, and Cavender, Nancy
2006Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kayam, Orly
2018 “The readability and simplicity of Donald Trump’s language.” Political Studies Review 16 (1): 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellner, Douglas
2018 “Swamp King: A Cultural Studies Parable.” In Handbook of Cultural Studies and Education, edited by Peter P. Trifonas and Susan Jagger, 277–294. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Ramona
2017 “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 607–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
2017 “A Taxonomy of Trump Tweets.” [URL]
2016Understanding Trump. [URL]
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy B.
2007 “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–1209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddalena, Giovanni
2016 “Political Communication in the (Iconic) Trump Epoch.” European View 15 (2): 245–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majdik, Zoltan P., and Keith, William M.
2011 “Expertise as Argument: Authority, Democracy, and Problem-Solving.” Argumentation 25 (3): 371–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín-Rojo, Luisa and Van Dijk, Teun A.
1997 “ ‘There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8 (4): 523–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGranahan, Carole
2017 “An Anthropology of Lying: Trump and the Political Sociality of Moral Outrage. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 243–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Andrew, Deane, Claudia, and McGeeney, Kyley
2016 “Why 2016 Election Polls Missed their Mark.” Pew Research Center, November 9 2016 [URL]
Milgram, Stanley
1974Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Morris, Jonathan S.
2007 “Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (3): 707–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nai, Alessandro, Coma, Ferran M., and Maier Jürgen
2019 “Donald Trump, Populism, and the Age of Extremes: Comparing the Personality Traits and Campaigning Styles of Trump and Other Leaders Worldwide.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 609–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, Brian L.
2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34 (1): 59–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfiffner, James P.
2018 “The Contemporary Presidency: Organizing the Trump Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 153–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ProPublica
2017 “About Us.” [URL]
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society 22 (6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S., and Rivers, Damian J.
2018a “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b “Political Twitter Discourse Corpus (PTDC).” [URL]
Rudolph, Thomas
2019 “Populist Anger, Donald Trump, and the 2016 Election.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinions and Parties. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanghani, Radhika
2020 “How I make the average UK salary from being an Instagram influencer.” The Telegraph, February 5 2020 [URL]
Santa Ana, Otto
2017 “The Rhetoric of Our Celebrity Demagogue.” Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies 42 (2): 267–283.Google Scholar
Schneiker, Andrea
2018 “Telling the Story of the Superhero and the Anti-Politician as President: Donald Trump’s Branding on Twitter.” Political Studies Review 17 (3): 210–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolee, Galen, and Caton, Steve
2018 “Twitter, Trump, and the Base: A Shift to a New Form of Presidential Talk?Signs and Society 6 (1): 147–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Time
2015 “Presidential Announcement Speech.” [URL]
Union of Concerned Scientists
2017 “Attacks on Science.” [URL]
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication”. Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero
2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings. Discourse & Society 25 (4): 500–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valverde, Miriam
2019 “Donald Trump Stalls on Promise to Build a Wall, Have Mexico Pay for It.” Politifact, January 14 2019 [URL]
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin
2018 “Media Coverage of Shifting Emotional Regimes: Donald Trump’s Angry Populism.” Media, Culture & Society 40 (5): 766–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldman, Katy
2016 “Trump’s Tower of Babble.” Slate, November 2 2016 [URL]
Wang, Yaqin, and Liu, Haitao
2018 “Is Trump Always Rambling Like a Fourth-Grade Student? An Analysis of Stylistic Features of Donald Trump’s Political Discourse During the 2016 Election.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 299–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winberg, Oscar
2017 “Insult Politics: Donald Trump, Right-Wing Populism, and Incendiary Language.” European Journal of American Studies 12 (2). [URL]. DOI logo
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Cabas-Mijares, Ayleen, Sara Shaban & Cristina Mislán
2024. Talking back to the wall: Problematizing trans/national media and counter-publics in border politics. Global Media and Communication DOI logo
del Saz-Rubio, Mª Milagros
2024. Delineating the discursive (de) legitimation strategies outlined by Spanish politicians in their no-confidence motion speeches. Discourse & Communication DOI logo
Kosman, Marcin
2024. Strategie (de)legitymizacyjne kandydatów w wyborach na prezydenta Rzeszowa w 2021 roku. Analiza korpusowa wpisów na Twitterze. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 20:1  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Fattore, Christina & Karsyn Wagner
2023. Exploring word choice and narrative framing in trump's trade tweets. Social Science Quarterly 104:5  pp. 971 ff. DOI logo
Nourani, Hossein, Mohammad Mohammadian, Reza Sarhaddi, Afsaneh Danesh & Farzaneh Latifi
2023. Discursive delegitimization of Rouhani's nuclear diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal by Iranian conservatives on Twitter. Digest of Middle East Studies 32:3  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Ramasubramanian, Srividya & Anthony Ramirez
2023. Community-Based Art Interventions, Migrant Health Inequalities, and COVID-19 Coping. In Migrants and the COVID-19 Pandemic,  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Bustinza, Monica A. & Kaila Witkowski
2022. Immigrants, deviants, and drug users: A rhetorical analysis of President Trump's fear‐driven tweets during the 2019 government shutdown. Policy & Internet 14:4  pp. 788 ff. DOI logo
Dhaher, Cjyar Nazar Dhaher & Agah Gümüş
2022. Lessons from Media-Centered Climate Change Literature. Sustainability 14:3  pp. 1404 ff. DOI logo
Díaz McConnell, Eileen
2022. “It could be 3 million, it could be 30 million”: Quantitative misperceptions about undocumented immigration and immigration attitudes in the Trump era. Latino Studies 20:2  pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Forchtner, Bernhard & Özgür Özvatan
2022. De/legitimising EUrope through the performance of crises. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Jaber, Fadi
2022. Social media framing of the 2022 ‘War in Ukraine’: A content analysis study of the Canadian prime minister’s tweets. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies DOI logo
Norfarah, Nordin, A. K. Siti-Nabiha & Mohd Ali Samsudin
2022. Social Network Analysis to Identify Influencer in Twitter Conversation on SMEs in Times of Covid-19 Pandemic. In Financial Technology (FinTech), Entrepreneurship, and Business Development [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 486],  pp. 439 ff. DOI logo
Rodriguez, Nathian Shae & Mariana De Maio
2021. Straddling the Wall: Comparative Framing of Trump’s Border Wall in U.S. & Mexican Newspapers. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 8:4  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.