Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:6 (2020) ► pp.916–937

A corpus-driven exploration of U.S. language planning and language ideology from 2013 to 2018

ORCID logo | The Pennsylvania State University
| The Pennsylvania State University

Language planning is influenced by ideological stances, and exports those ideologies through the policy making process. Residing beneath policy documents lies a language policy of the texts themselves, policing their structure and linguistic forms by which ideologies are managed. Thus, a careful collection of such documents should offer rich grounds for analysis, to leverage claims of ideology against empirically founded patterns, and offer rigorous comparison across actors, genres, and policy areas.

We conducted a corpus-driven exploration of all bills from Congressional sessions 113 to 115 (33,968 documents, 85,612,752 words), and describe the collocational character of U.S. language policy, the semantic preferences of those collocations, and discuss the exposed ideological structure of these bills. By utilizing such a large corpus, this study responds to two issues in corpus-aided language policy analysis: (1) a paucity of very large corpora analyses; (2) further utilizes corpus-driven methods to naively investigate ideologies in status planning.

Keywords: language policy and planning, corpus linguistics, language ideology, legal text
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and literature review
    • 2.1Language policy and planning and legal text
    • 2.2Language and ideology
    • 2.3Language policy and planning in the United States
    • 2.4Locating ideology in discourse
    • 2.5Large-scale corpora and critical perspectives
    • 2.6Synthesis of corpus linguistics and language policy and planning
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Pilot
    • 4.2Main study results
      • 4.2.1Absolute frequency
      • 4.2.2Left-slot frequency
      • 4.2.3Right-slot frequency
      • 4.2.4Main results discussion
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 16 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19108.dia
References
Ackermann, Kirsten, and Yu-Hua Chen
2013 “Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A Corpus-Driven and Expert-Judged Approach.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121: 235–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif
2005 “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L.
2018 AntConc (version 3.5.3). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL]
Baker, Paul
2012 “Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 247–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, Richard B.
2006 “Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context.” Current Issues in Language Planning, 7 (2&3): 147–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple
2014 “Why Do News Values Matter? Towards a New Methodological Framework for Analysing News Discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and Beyond.” Discourse & Society 25 (2): 135–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes
2004 “If You Look at...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25 (3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen
1994 “Corpus-Based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics.” Applied Linguistics 15 (2): 169–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braley, Bruce L. H.R.946 – 111th Congress (2009–2010): Plain Writing Act of 2010
2010.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John M. Sinclair, and Martin Warren
2009 “Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams.” Applied Linguistics 30 (2): 236–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, Moshe, and Iddo Porat
2011 “Proportionality and the Culture of Justification. The American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (2): 463–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, Xiao Lan
2016 “Conflicting Language Ideologies and Contradictory Language Practices in Singaporean Multilingual Families.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37 (7): 694–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2001 Language and Power. Longman.Google Scholar
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, Shannon
2014 “Using Lexical Variables to Identify Language Ideologies in a Policy Corpus.” Corpora 9 (1): 57–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery
2017 “Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence.” Language Learning 67 (S1): 155–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holborow, Marnie
2007 “Language, Ideology and Neoliberalism.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (1): 51–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H.
2006 “Frameworks and Models in Language Policy and Planning.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 24–41. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publications.Google Scholar
Hutton, Chris
2009 Language, Meaning and the Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith
2012 “Language Ideology.” Anthropology. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David Cassels
2009 “Ethnography of Language Policy.” Language Policy 8 (2): 139–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Language Policy. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Peter E.
2007 “Why There Is No Such Thing as ‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’” Language & Communication 271: 337–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B., and Richard B. Baldauf
1997 Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kheirkhah, Mina, and Asta Cekaite
2015 “Language Maintenance in a Multilingual Family: Informal Heritage Language Lessons in Parent–Child Interactions.” Multilingua 34 (3): 319–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid
2010 “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitry, and Fernand de Varennes
2015 “Language and Law.” In Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide, ed. by Francis M. Hult and David Cassels Johnson, 56–66. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina
2012 English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde
2007 “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 154–79. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
McKay, Sandra Lee
1996 Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Menken, Kate
2013 “Restrictive Language Education Policies and Emergent Bilingual Youth: A Perfect Storm with Imperfect Outcomes.” Theory Into Practice 52 (3): 160–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millar, Jeff
2013 “An Interdiscursive Analysis of Language and Immigrant Integration Policy Discourse in Canada.” Critical Discourse Studies 10 (1): 18–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna, Päivi Honkatukia, and Minna Ruuskanen
2007 “Legal Texts as Discourses.” In Exploiting the Limits of Law: Swedish Feminism and the Challenge to Pessimism, ed. by Åsa Gunnarsson, Eva-Maria Svensson, and Margaret Davies, 69–87. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan
2004 “Utterly Content in Each Other’s Company.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 131–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricento, Thomas
2000 “Historical and Theoretical Perspectives in Language Policy and Planning.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (2): 196–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ricento, Thomas, and Nancy Hornberger
1996 “Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional.” TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 401–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricento, Thomas, and Wayne E. Wright
2008 “Language Policy and Education in the United States.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. by Nancy H. Hornberger. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, Elana G.
2006 Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Language Policy and Language Assessment: The Relationship.” Current Issues in Language Planning 9 (3): 363–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Cases of Language Policy Resistance in Israel’s Centralized Educational System.” In Negotiating Language Policies in Schools: Educators as Policymakers, ed. by Kate Menken, and Ofelia García, 182–97. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard
2004 Language Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard, and Elana G. Shohamy
2000 “Language Practice, Language Ideology, and Language Policy.” Language Policy and Pedagogy: Essays in Honour of A. Ronald Walton, 1–41.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1995 “Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Studies.” Functions of Language 2 (1): 23–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas Close
2013 “ ‘English... It’s Part of Our Blood’: Ideologies of Language and Nation in United States Congressional Discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (1): 37–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Wayne, and Virginia Collier
2002 A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long Term Academic Achievement: Final Report: Project 1.1 Berkeley, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence (CREDE).Google Scholar
Tollefson, James
2006 “Critical Theory in Language Policy.” In An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 42–59. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
van Splunder, Frank
2016 “Language Ideologies Regarding English-Medium Instruction in European Higher Education: Insights from Flanders and Finland.” In Discursive Approaches to Language Policy, ed. by Elisabeth Barakos, and Johann W. Unger, 205–230. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G.
1998 “The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 136–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiley, Terrence G., and Ofelia Garcia
2016 “Language Policy and Planning in Language Education: Legacies, Consequences, and Possibilities.” The Modern Language Journal 100 (S1): 48–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2011 “Complex Texts: Analysing Understanding, Explaining and Interpreting Meanings.” Discourse Studies 13 (5): 623–33. [URL]
2017 “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Elites’, and the ‘People’: Who’s Who?” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala
2015 “(Supra)National Identity and Language: Rethinking National and European Migration Policies and the Linguistic Integration of Migrants.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 351: 253–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Katheryn A., and Bambi B. Schieffelin
1994 “Language Ideology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23 (1): 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard, and Tony McEnery
2006 “Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” Applied Linguistics 27 (1): 103–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa & Rachelle Vessey
2021. Using corpus linguistics to investigate agency and benign neglect in organisational language policy and planning: the United Nations as a case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.