Article published in:Studying Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:2] 2003
► pp. 289–309
Methodology versus scholarship?
Overcoming the divide in analysing identity narratives of people with cancer
Distinctions between traditional scholarship and methodologically informed procedures can support unhelpful stereotypes which parallel that between qualitative and quantitative research. These can have a negative effect on the practice of social research in general, and textual analysis in particular. Drawing on a study of morally charged narratives of collective and personal identity in newspaper texts reporting cancer experiences, where gender politics are negotiated, I show how this distinction can be overcome in research practice. Quantitative analysis is shown to be useful in exploring text and generating insights, as well as strengthening generalisations from qualitative anecdotes. Automated text analysis using NVIVO and Concordance software can produce new “readings” otherwise hidden from view that can be followed up in close qualitative analysis. Thus traditional views of qualitative research as exploratory and quantitative as confirmatory can be overturned. Analysts of discourse can use automation and counting without compromising their capacity to think creatively about meaning.
Keywords: discourse analysis, quantitative and qualitative, narrative analysis, content analysis, computer software, collective identity
Published online: 18 November 2003
Becker, H. S.
Becker, H. S. and Geer, B.
Becker, H. S. Geer, B., Hughes, E. and Strauss, A.
Bryman, A. and Cramer, D.
Clarke, J. N.
Clarke, J. N. and Robinson, J.
Coffey, A., Holbrook, B. and Atkinson, P.
1996 Qualitative data analysis: technologies and representations. Sociological Research On-line 1(1) www.socresonline.org.uk/socres-online/1/1/4.html
Galtung, J. and Ruge, M.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L.
1997 Theory building in qualitative research and computer programs for the management of textual data. Sociological Research Online 2 (2) http://www.socres-online.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/1.html
Lantz, P. M. and Booth, K. M.
Saywell, C., Henderson, L. and Beattie, L.
2001 Collective identity and expressive forms. Center for the Study of Democracy. Working Paper 01–07. http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/01–07
Cited by 6 other publications
Chidlow, Agnieszka, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki & Catherine Welch
Freake, Rachelle, Guillaume Gentil & Jaffer Sheyholislami
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.