Article published In:
Studying Identity: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges[Journal of Language and Politics 2:2] 2003
► pp. 289–309
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:2] 2003
► pp. 289–309
Methodology versus scholarship?
Overcoming the divide in analysing identity narratives of people with cancer
Distinctions between traditional scholarship and methodologically informed procedures can support unhelpful stereotypes which parallel that between qualitative and quantitative research. These can have a negative effect on the practice of social research in general, and textual analysis in particular. Drawing on a study of morally charged narratives of collective and personal identity in newspaper texts reporting cancer experiences, where gender politics are negotiated, I show how this distinction can be overcome in research practice. Quantitative analysis is shown to be useful in exploring text and generating insights, as well as strengthening generalisations from qualitative anecdotes. Automated text analysis using NVIVO and Concordance software can produce new “readings” otherwise hidden from view that can be followed up in close qualitative analysis. Thus traditional views of qualitative research as exploratory and quantitative as confirmatory can be overturned. Analysts of discourse can use automation and counting without compromising their capacity to think creatively about meaning.
References
Anderson, B.
1991 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso (Second edition).
Becker, H. S.
1998 Tricks of the Trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
Becker, H. S. and Geer, B.
1960 Participant observation: the analysis of qualitative field data. In: R. N. Adams and J. J. Preiss (eds). Human Organization Research: Field Relations and Techniques. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press, 267–289.
Becker, H. S. Geer, B., Hughes, E. and Strauss, A.
1961 Boys in White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Billig, M.
1988 Methodology and scholarship in understanding ideological explanation. In: C. Antaki (ed.). Analysing Everyday Explanation. London: Sage, 199–215.
Bryman, A.
1988 Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
1992 Quantitative and qualitative research: further thoughts on their integration. In: J. Brannen (ed.). Mixing Methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Aldershot: Avebury, 57–78.
Bryman, A. and Cramer, D.
2001 Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows. London Routledge.
Clarke, J. N.
1986 Cancer meanings in the media: implications for physicians. Studies in Communications 31, 175–215.
1999 Prostate cancer’s hegemonic masculinity in select print mass media depictions (1974–1995). Health Communication 11(1): 59–74.
Clarke, J. N. and Robinson, J.
1999 Testicular cancer: medicine and machismo in the media 1980–94. Health 3(3), 263–282.
Coffey, A., Holbrook, B. and Atkinson, P.
1996 Qualitative data analysis: technologies and representations. Sociological Research On-line 1(1)
[URL]
Corner, J.
1997 Nursing and the counter culture for cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care 61, 174–181.
Craib, I.
1994 The Importance of Disappointment. London: Routledge.
Galtung, J. and Ruge, M.
1973 Structuring and selecting news. In: S. Cohen and J. Young (eds). The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media. London: Constable, 62–72.
Giddens, A.
1992 The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L.
1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hesse-Biber, S.
1995 Unleashing Frankenstein’s monster? The use of computers in qualitative research. In: R. G. Burgess (ed.). Studies in Qualitative Methodology Volume 5: Computing and Qualitative Research, Hampton Hill: JAI Press. 25–42.
Kelle, U.
1997 Theory building in qualitative research and computer programs for the management of textual data. Sociological Research Online 2 (2)
[URL]
2004 Computer assisted qualitative data analysis. In C. Seale, D. Silverman, J. Gubrium, and G. Gobo. (eds). Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage
Lantz, P. M. and Booth, K. M.
1998 The social construction of the breast cancer epidemic. Social Science and Medicine 46(7): 907–918.
Lofland, J.
1971 Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Lupton, D.
1994 Femininity, responsibility, and the technological imperative: discourses on breast cancer in the Australian press. International Journal of Health Services 24(1), 73–89.
Potts L. K.
(ed.) 2000 Ideologies of breast cancer: feminist perspectives. London: MacMillan.
Richards, L.
1999 Using NVIVO in qualitative research. Melbourne: Qualitative Solutions and Research.
Sarna, L.
1995 Lung cancer: the overlooked womens’ health priority. Cancer Practice 3(1):13–19.
Saywell, C., Henderson, L. and Beattie, L.
2000 Sexualised illness: the newsworthy body in media representations of breast cancer. In: L. K. Potts (ed.). Ideologies of Breast Cancer: Feminist Perspectives. London: MacMillan.
Seale, C.
1999 The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Seale C.
2001a Sporting cancer: struggle language in news reports of people with cancer. Sociology of Health and Illness 23(3), 308–329
2001b Cancer in the news: religion, fate and justice in news stories about people with cancer. Health 5(4), 445–460.
2002a Cancer heroics: a study of news reports with particular reference to gender. Sociology 36(1), 107–126.
2002b Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative interview data. In J. Gubrium and J. Holstein (eds). Handbook of Interview Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Silverman, D.
2001 Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage
Snow, D.
2001 Collective identity and expressive forms. Center for the Study of Democracy. Working Paper 01–07. [URL]
Sontag, S.
1991 Illness as Metaphor. London: Penguin. (First published in 1978)
Taylor, V. and Whittier, N. E.
1992 Collective identity in social movement communities: lesbian feminist mobilization. In: A. D. Morris and C. M. Mueller (eds). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Arduser, Lora
Chidlow, Agnieszka, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki & Catherine Welch
2014. Translation in cross-language international business research: Beyond equivalence. Journal of International Business Studies 45:5 ► pp. 562 ff. 
Freake, Rachelle, Guillaume Gentil & Jaffer Sheyholislami
2011. A bilingual corpus-assisted discourse study of the construction of nationhood and belonging in Quebec. Discourse & Society 22:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Kahn‐Nisser, Sara
2013. Conditionality, Communication and Compliance: The Effect of Monitoring on Collective Labour Rights in Candidate Countries. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51:6 ► pp. 1040 ff.
Plage, Stefanie
2020. Cancer survivorship reimagined: A qualitative study on evolving interpretative repertoires of cancer and survivorship using participant‐produced photography. European Journal of Cancer Care 29:6
Seale, Clive
2005. New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web. Sociology of Health and Illness 27:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.