Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 20:4 (2021) ► pp.563–584
Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse
Constructing the ethos of the receptive politician
This paper puts forward an argument about the relation between narratives and constructed dialogue in political discourse. Narratives of dialogue are special cases of constructed dialogue that emphasize the embeddedness of the speaker, displayed as a discourse participant engaging in a conversation with an ordinary citizen or a public figure. Close analysis of British, German, and French parliamentary debates reveals how narratives of dialogue shape an image of the speaker involved in a dialogue. While being engaged in the activity of debating, parliamentarians simultaneously perform the act of debating. I argue that the main point of narratives of dialogue is not so much to report on a prior or hypothetical situation, but to create the ethos of a Member of Parliament receptive to their interlocutors.
Keywords: constructed dialogue, narrative, identity construction, parliamentary discourse, public image, ethos
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Bringing constructed dialogue and narratives together
- 3.Collecting and annotating quotes from a corpus of parliamentary debates
- 4.Indeterminate voices: Establishing a dialogue with the opponents
- 5.Well-known voices: Displaying the professional politician
- 6.Singular anonymous voices: Talking to the ordinary voter
- 7.Conclusion: Narratives of dialogue in the service of ethos of familiarity and authenticity
- Notes
-
References
References
Amossy, Ruth
2001 “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22 (1): 1–23. 
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2008 “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk 28 (3): 377–96.
Baynam, Mike, and Stef Slembrouck
2009 “Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 19 (4): 439–58.
Bayley, Paul
ed. 2004 Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie
2018 “Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 585–93.
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2010 “Face, Facework and Political Discourse.” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 23 (2): 155–85.
Bublitz, Wolfram
2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Burkhardt, Armin, and Kornelia Pape
eds. 2000 Sprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2005 “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16 (4): 481–513.
Fetzer, Anita
2012 “Quotations in monologic and dialogic political discourse.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: a Cross-Cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, 72–86. Universität Würzburg.
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2012 “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23 (2): 127–44.
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2018 “ ‘What I Would Say to John and Everyone like John Is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29 (5): 495–513.
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heiden, Serge
2010 “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” In 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, edited by Ryo Otoguro, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Umemoto, Kei Yoshimoto, and Yasunari Harada, 389–98. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University. [URL]
Holt, Elizabeth
2009 “Reported Speech.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen
2016 “Parliament as a Conceptual Nexus.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept, 1–16. New York/Oxford: Berghahn.
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92.
2006 “Parliamentary Discourses.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, edited by Keith Brown, 2nd ed., 188–97. Oxford: Elsevier.
ed. 2010 European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kranert, Michael
2017 “ ‘Today I Offer You, and We Offer the Country a New Vision’: The Strategic Use of First Person Pronouns in Party Conference Speeches of the Third Way.” Discourse & Society 28 (2): 182–203.
Kuo, Sai-Hua
2001 “Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202.
Labov, William
1972 Language in the Inner City. Studies in Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Marnette, Sophie
2005 Speech and Thought Presentation in French. Concepts and Strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ryfe, David M.
2006 “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (1): 72–93.
Semino, Elena, and Mick Short
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London/New York: Routledge.
Tannen, Deborah
1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, edited by Florian Coulmas, 311–32. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
2007 Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Truan, Naomi
2016a “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée Nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and Tools for LANGuage). [URL]
2016b “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL]
2016c “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). [URL]
2016d “« Les citations doivent être exactes ! ». Pratiques polémiques de la citation au parlement.” Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 32. [URL]
2019a “Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67 (3): 307–37.
2019b “The Discursive Construction of the People in European Political Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics of a Contested Concept in German, French, and British Parliamentary Debates.” In Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze, 831: 201–28. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
forthcoming. The Politics of Person Reference. Third-person forms in English, German, and French. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
2016 “I hope you don’t mind me quoting you”: Narrative reports in the service of (de)legitimisation. In Janusz Badio (ed.), Events and Narratives in Language (Lodz Studies in Language)
, vol. 521, 205–221. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.