Article in:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles

Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse

Constructing the ethos of the receptive politician

| University of Leipzig
This paper puts forward an argument about the relation between narratives and constructed dialogue in political discourse. Narratives of dialogue are special cases of constructed dialogue that emphasize the embeddedness of the speaker, displayed as a discourse participant engaging in a conversation with an ordinary citizen or a public figure. Close analysis of British, German, and French parliamentary debates reveals how narratives of dialogue shape an image of the speaker involved in a dialogue. While being engaged in the activity of debating, parliamentarians simultaneously perform the act of debating. I argue that the main point of narratives of dialogue is not so much to report on a prior or hypothetical situation, but to create the ethos of a Member of Parliament receptive to their interlocutors.
Keywords: constructed dialogue, narrative, identity construction, parliamentary discourse, public image, ethos
Published online: 01 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20018.tru
References

References

Amossy, Ruth
2001 “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22 (1): 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2008 “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk 28 (3): 377–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baynam, Mike, and Stef Slembrouck
2009 “Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 19 (4): 439–58.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul
ed. 2004 Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie
2018 “Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 585–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2010 “Face, Facework and Political Discourse.” Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 23 (2): 155–85.Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, edited by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin, and Kornelia Pape
eds. 2000 Sprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2005 “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16 (4): 481–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2012 “Quotations in monologic and dialogic political discourse.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-Ups Across Discourse Domains: a Cross-Cultural Exploration of their Forms and Functions, 72–86. Universität Würzburg.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2012 “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23 (2): 127–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2018 “ ‘What I Would Say to John and Everyone like John Is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29 (5): 495–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Heiden, Serge
2010 “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” In 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, edited by Ryo Otoguro, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Umemoto, Kei Yoshimoto, and Yasunari Harada, 389–98. Institute for Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Development, Waseda University. https://​halshs​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/halshs​-00549764​/document
Holt, Elizabeth
2009 “Reported Speech.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen
2016 “Parliament as a Conceptual Nexus.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept, 1–16. New York/Oxford: Berghahn. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Parliamentary Discourses.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, edited by Keith Brown, 2nd ed., 188–97. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 2010 European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranert, Michael
2017 “ ‘Today I Offer You, and We Offer the Country a New Vision’: The Strategic Use of First Person Pronouns in Party Conference Speeches of the Third Way.” Discourse & Society 28 (2): 182–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua
2001 “Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Language in the Inner City. Studies in Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marnette, Sophie
2005 Speech and Thought Presentation in French. Concepts and Strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryfe, David M.
2006 “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (1): 72–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena, and Mick Short
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, edited by Florian Coulmas, 311–32. Berlin/New York/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truan, Naomi
2016a “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Assemblée Nationale (2002–2012) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and Tools for LANGuage). hdl​.handle​.net​/11403​/fr​-parl
2016b “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the Deutscher Bundestag (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). hdl​.handle​.net​/11403​/de​-parl
2016c “Parliamentary Debates on Europe at the House of Commons (1998–2015) [Corpus].” ORTOLANG (Open Resources and TOols for LANGuage). hdl​.handle​.net​/11403​/uk​-parl
2016d “« Les citations doivent être exactes ! ». Pratiques polémiques de la citation au parlement.” Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, 32. https://​tipa​.revues​.org​/1689
2019a “Talking about, for, and to the People: Populism and Representation in Parliamentary Debates on Europe.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67 (3): 307–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019b “The Discursive Construction of the People in European Political Discourse: Semantics and Pragmatics of a Contested Concept in German, French, and British Parliamentary Debates.” In Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist Discourses across the Political Spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze, 83: 201–28. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. The Politics of Person Reference. Third-person forms in English, German, and French. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa
2016 “I hope you don’t mind me quoting you”: Narrative reports in the service of (de)legitimisation. In Janusz Badio (ed.), Events and Narratives in Language (Lodz Studies in Language) , vol. 52, 205–221. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar