Article published in:
Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 62–78

Logics, discourse theory and methods

Advances, challenges and ways forward

| University of Essex
| University of Essex
| University of Essex
| University of Essex
| University of Essex
| University of Essex
Logics of Critical Explanation proposed a methodological approach that could render the insights of Poststructuralist Discourse Theory (PDT) and post-Marxist political theory more conducive to critical empirical research. It also offered a language with which to counter positivist tendencies to colonize the space of methods and research strategies, showing how PDT could facilitate both explanatory and critical endeavours. Since its publication in 2007, a number of studies have applied the logics framework to empirical cases, while critically engaging with its methodological and theoretical arguments. The main purpose of this article is to evaluate some of these developments, and to set out some future challenges faced by this research programme.
Keywords: logics, post-Marxist political theory, discourse theory, poststructuralist discourse analysis, methodology, fantasmatic logics, political logics, social logics, articulation, retroduction
Published online: 14 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20048.gly
References

References

Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek
2000 Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico
2017 The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community media participation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Group. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, Simon
ed. 1996 Deconstruction and Pragmatism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon, and Oliver Marchart
eds. 2004 Laclau: A Critical Reader, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1981 Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geras, Norman
1990 Discourses of Extremity: Radical Ethics and Post-Marxist Extravagances. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason
2012 “Body, discourse, and the turn to matter.” In Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited by Sanja Bahun and Dušan Radunovic, 173–174. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2014 “Hating government and voting against one’s interests: Self-Transgression, enjoyment, critique.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 19 (2): 179–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political theory, Routledge innovations in political theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2019 “The Retroductive Cycle: The Research Process iin Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse, Culture and Organization, edited by Tomas Marttila, 105–125. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, Robin Klimecki, and Hugh Willmott
2012 “Cooling out the marks: The ideology and politics of the financial crisis.” Journal of cultural economy 5 (3): 297–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Logics in policy and practice: a critical nodal analysis of the UK banking reform process.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (4): 393–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and Ewen Speed
2012 “Varieties of co-production in public services: time banks in a UK health policy context.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 402–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, Ewen Speed, and Karen West
2015 “Logics of marginalisation in health and social care reform: Integration, choice, and provider-blind provision.” Critical Social Policy 35 (1): 45–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, Steven, Stephen Hall, David Howarth, and Natacha Seigenuret
2017 “Prospects for the “Sustainable City”: Characterizing and Evaluating Rival Discourses of Radical Change in Bristol and Grenoble” Political Geography 59: 36–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth
2019 “Discourse, policy and the environment: hegemony, statements and the analysis of U.K. airport expansion.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5): 464–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The politics of airport expansion in the United Kingdom: hegemony, policy and the rhetoric of ‘sustainable aviation’. Manchester: Manchester University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Benjamin
2015 “Fantasies of subjugation: a discourse theoretical account of British policy on the European Union.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (2): 139–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David
2005 “Applying Discourse Theory: The Method of Articulation.” In Discourse theory in European politics, edited by David Howarth and Torfing Jacob, 316–349. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Poststructuralism and After: Structure, Subjectivity and Power, London: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas
2020 “The Post-Marxist political economy of EU Trade: A discourse-theoretical analysis of the construction of political agency in the European Parliament.” Accessed June 5, 2020. Available at SSRN: https://​ssrn​.com​/abstract​=3620061 or Crossref
Jacobs, Thomas and Robin Tschötschel
2019 “Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (5): 469–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
2004 “Glimpsing the Future.” In Laclau: a critical reader, edited by Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 279–328. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Marttila, Tomas
2015 Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos
1990 Post-Marxist Alternatives: The Construction of Social Orders. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Remling, Elise
2018 “Logics, assumptions and genre chains: a framework for poststructuralist policy analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (1): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skelcher, Chris, Helen Sullivan, and Steven Jeffares
2013 Hybrid Governance in European Cities. London: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tønder, Lars, and Lasse Thomassen
eds. 2005 Radical Democracy: Politics Between Abundance and Lack. Manchester: MUP.Google Scholar
West, Karen
2011 “Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 414–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan
2012 “Overcoming the post-structuralist methodolocial deficit – metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process.” Pragmatics 22 (3): 501–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 “Politics and the political in critical discourse studies: state of the art and a call for an intensified focus on the metapolitical dimension of discursive practice.” Critical Discourse Studies 16(2): 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan, and Benjamin De Cleen
2020 “The polyphonic critique of trade unions: unpacking the logics of union critical discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies, online first. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj
1989 The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1990 “Beyond discourse-analysis.” In New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time, edited by Ernesto Laclau, 249–260. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.